MR and Unleaded Gas
Originally Posted by avengerhed
+1 higher octane than your car is designed for will not make your engine run more efficiently.
I dont normally post in the evo section, but I have a buddy with a 2005 corvette and it says the "recommended" fuel is 91, but he still puts in 87 and it runs fine. For instance my rrm piggyback recommends 91 octane as well, I started running 93 for a month or so, then switched over to 89 and I didnt recognize a bit of difference. My car still runs excellent. Just my two cents.
I don't think everyone reading this really understands how much of a difference octane makes with forced induction, especially with boost pressure like on the Evo. All of that extra air mass has to be mixed with a proportionate amount of fuel. So a forced induction motor uses ***multiple*** times the fuel of a naturally aspirated motor. What that boils down to is that the fuel mixture has to burn well without knock, thats why corvette^^^ and the ralliart^^^ are less suceptable to knock. NA simply burns less fuel at once. And it is a fact that lower grade octane IS more prone to knock, which in turn will retard the timing, which in turn will decrease performance. That is much more noticeable with forced induction.
Originally Posted by shiftdsm E
I don't think everyone reading this really understands how much of a difference octane makes with forced induction, especially with boost pressure like on the Evo. All of that extra air mass has to be mixed with a proportionate amount of fuel. So a forced induction motor uses ***multiple*** times the fuel of a naturally aspirated motor. What that boils down to is that the fuel mixture has to burn well without knock, thats why corvette^^^ and the ralliart^^^ are less suceptable to knock. NA simply burns less fuel at once. And it is a fact that lower grade octane IS more prone to knock, which in turn will retard the timing, which in turn will decrease performance. That is much more noticeable with forced induction.
Originally Posted by gkania
What color was the MR? What Shell? East or West Orl?
.
Originally Posted by concordmitsunet
Actually, Higher octane gas burns slower as there is a higher ratio of "fuel to filler" and thus it should make a car designed for 87 or a car designed for 91/93 get better gas mileage and perhaps show slightly better performance... the question is whether or not that out weighs the price difference at the pump 
higher "fuel to filler" ratio??? the octane rating is based on the chemistry of the gasoline...93 octane gas has the burn characteristics of a fuel made with 93% Isooctane and 7% Heptane. Straight gasoline is 70/30 and different strategies are employed to increase the octane rating but there is no "filler" in 87 octane gas...its an improvement over straight gas and 93 is a further improvement.
again, there is NO cleaning, performance, or efficiency benefit from running higher-than-recommended octane fuels in a fuel-injected car.
again, there is NO cleaning, performance, or efficiency benefit from running higher-than-recommended octane fuels in a fuel-injected car.


