Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

MR and Unleaded Gas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 12:50 PM
  #16  
walkedu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
From: space
and then kick him straight in the wiener!
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 01:20 PM
  #17  
kmxxbadboy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
From: Northern New Jersey
Whatever. Just look for the spare parts MR from Florida in a couple of months.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 01:43 PM
  #18  
concordmitsunet's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Originally Posted by avengerhed
+1 higher octane than your car is designed for will not make your engine run more efficiently.
Actually, Higher octane gas burns slower as there is a higher ratio of "fuel to filler" and thus it should make a car designed for 87 or a car designed for 91/93 get better gas mileage and perhaps show slightly better performance... the question is whether or not that out weighs the price difference at the pump
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 02:01 PM
  #19  
BLKRalliArt04's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 0
From: .
I dont normally post in the evo section, but I have a buddy with a 2005 corvette and it says the "recommended" fuel is 91, but he still puts in 87 and it runs fine. For instance my rrm piggyback recommends 91 octane as well, I started running 93 for a month or so, then switched over to 89 and I didnt recognize a bit of difference. My car still runs excellent. Just my two cents.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 02:15 PM
  #20  
shiftdsm E's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: Boston, Ma
I don't think everyone reading this really understands how much of a difference octane makes with forced induction, especially with boost pressure like on the Evo. All of that extra air mass has to be mixed with a proportionate amount of fuel. So a forced induction motor uses ***multiple*** times the fuel of a naturally aspirated motor. What that boils down to is that the fuel mixture has to burn well without knock, thats why corvette^^^ and the ralliart^^^ are less suceptable to knock. NA simply burns less fuel at once. And it is a fact that lower grade octane IS more prone to knock, which in turn will retard the timing, which in turn will decrease performance. That is much more noticeable with forced induction.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 02:27 PM
  #21  
gkania's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Deltona
What color was the MR? What Shell? East or West Orl?
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 02:29 PM
  #22  
concordmitsunet's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Originally Posted by shiftdsm E
I don't think everyone reading this really understands how much of a difference octane makes with forced induction, especially with boost pressure like on the Evo. All of that extra air mass has to be mixed with a proportionate amount of fuel. So a forced induction motor uses ***multiple*** times the fuel of a naturally aspirated motor. What that boils down to is that the fuel mixture has to burn well without knock, thats why corvette^^^ and the ralliart^^^ are less suceptable to knock. NA simply burns less fuel at once. And it is a fact that lower grade octane IS more prone to knock, which in turn will retard the timing, which in turn will decrease performance. That is much more noticeable with forced induction.
well a corvette burns more fuel than an evo- stock hence 350hp vs 271(or whatever mitsu wants us to beleive) its just that it burns it over 5.7 liters of displacement so there is less power per liter and it will have a lower octane requirement to run well... Fact is yes, if you drive your evo on 87 you will say to yourself "this sucks" and lose to cars you wouldnt have otherwise...
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 02:39 PM
  #23  
dsm95hybrid's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by gkania
What color was the MR? What Shell? East or West Orl?
I thought I knew and have done work on every MR in Orlando. I know none of my clients would ever do something like this. I called all of them. No dice. What did they look like? BTW, one is a salesperson for .
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 06:05 PM
  #24  
DragNRacing's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 1
From: WI
I probably would have gotten the plates and posted them so hopefully no one on the boards would ever end up buying it used!
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 06:11 PM
  #25  
avengerhed's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Marlboro, MA
Originally Posted by concordmitsunet
Actually, Higher octane gas burns slower as there is a higher ratio of "fuel to filler" and thus it should make a car designed for 87 or a car designed for 91/93 get better gas mileage and perhaps show slightly better performance... the question is whether or not that out weighs the price difference at the pump
burning slower means you can send unburnt fuel through the emissions system (fouling your cat). there is NO benefit to using higher-octane-than-prescribed fuel in a fuel injected car.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 06:15 PM
  #26  
avengerhed's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Marlboro, MA
higher "fuel to filler" ratio??? the octane rating is based on the chemistry of the gasoline...93 octane gas has the burn characteristics of a fuel made with 93% Isooctane and 7% Heptane. Straight gasoline is 70/30 and different strategies are employed to increase the octane rating but there is no "filler" in 87 octane gas...its an improvement over straight gas and 93 is a further improvement.

again, there is NO cleaning, performance, or efficiency benefit from running higher-than-recommended octane fuels in a fuel-injected car.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 07:05 PM
  #27  
mattsgto's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
93 or 91

There is a reason why has a sticker on the inside of the fuel cover that says "premium fuel only"
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 07:56 PM
  #28  
fromWRXtoEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,087
Likes: 5
From: Tucson
Let the guy run 87oct, he will find out the hard way. I is not going to be able to run much boost at all and he is in danger of really detonation. Ingorance can be expensive..
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 04:23 AM
  #29  
Ph3n1x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 0
From: ¯\(º_o)/¯
Originally Posted by kmxxbadboy
Whatever. Just look for the spare parts MR from Florida in a couple of months.
ROFL!!!
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 04:33 AM
  #30  
Ph3n1x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 0
From: ¯\(º_o)/¯
Originally Posted by gkania
What color was the MR? What Shell? East or West Orl?
Grey MR

South Orlando, Near the Airport
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:58 AM.