wow I knew I should have waited

 

For 93 Octane, stock cams, and a tune designed to be 100% consistent and trackable I can say im more then satifised with the results. My approach going in was not to simply make one non repeatable glory run and Nick wouldn't of been open to that idea even it was my goal. For numbers sake, I may get some dynojet numbers to prove a point however I'm confident my trap speeds will tell the story.

From overlays that we viewed in the process of tuning this car the differences in the overall shape of the curve over similarly equiped 03/05s on the stock turbo made the differences quite apparent.

As for the IX, its unfortunate that my results were ill timed to coincide with its release. I think comparisions should remain limited to similar 03/05 setups.

 

The increases on your car are good, no doubt about that. I guess I'm a bit jealous of the IX putting out considerably more power with much fewer mods.

Life is not fair It's supposed to be an evolution, not revolution.

 

Totally understandable, eventually I plan on pushing this setup further with alcohol injection however I was curious to see whether or not I could in a sense approach the numbers that Switzer had initially. Not to speculate, but depending upon what you believe as far as a percentage difference between a Dynojet and a Mustang dyno (i've been told around 15-18%) I think my results lend further credence to Tym Switzer's intial results with this turbo, albeit on a reflash over an AEM, and with a cat on 93 rather than 94.

 

Nice job. I wish dyno numbers were consistant across all dyno. I think they only way to truely tell what your HP was on any particular day is to run one at the strip and post your MPH.

 

Hopefully next week I'll be in a position to get to the track and bring back some numbers. Time is running out on this season but hopefully with the cool air and the Ecutek's launch control feature I can bring back some solid results.