Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

geddy 25g on a mustang dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 03:16 PM
  #16  
blowoffsilver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: NC
445hp on a mustang dyno is close to 500awhp on a dyonjet
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 03:52 PM
  #17  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by blowoffsilver
445hp on a mustang dyno is close to 500awhp on a dyonjet
Not always. Your trap speed is the true indicator of power. You can make a Mustang Dyno say anything. I trap 113 with about 330whp on a Dynojet, and you trapped 121. That's an 8mph difference, which is about an 80-90whp difference on a Dynojet generally speaking.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 03:57 PM
  #18  
marks03evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 585
Likes: 1
From: palm beach, florida
121 mph on a trap I would say is more then ~ 415 whp on a dynojet...

simply comparing to your numbers maybe so but on average it would be more in the 450 whp range
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 04:01 PM
  #19  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by marks03evo
121 mph on a trap I would say is more then ~ 415 whp on a dynojet...

simply comparing to your numbers maybe so but on average it would be more in the 450 whp range
What makes you think that? I wasn't just using my numbers, but those of many others. Mine is just the most direct example. Here are a few others that I know of firsthand:

03 w/alky dyno'd 350/350, then trapped 114.8mph
03 w/alky, cams, and AEM EMS dyno'd 400 and trapped 119.5mph
Jose Rivera (down your way) dyno'd 373 and trapped 116.7mph

Here are my combinations:
248whp = 104mph
282whp = 107.5mph
294whp = 108.5mph

All figures are on Dynojets.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 04:05 PM
  #20  
marks03evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 585
Likes: 1
From: palm beach, florida
ok well Scott from TTP-Engineering trapped I believe 115.5 or so and he dyno'd at ~ 410whp..

also ct9a gsr who dynod at 390 whp trapped 118 and I believe this was a mustang dyno.

so if this guy is trapping 121 id imagine he is 450 whp+ on a dynojet.

I mean we can argue forever on guesstimting what he could make using several different examples, but in the end lets just agree that 121 is a nice trap lol

Last edited by marks03evo; Nov 16, 2005 at 04:10 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 04:09 PM
  #21  
travelsize420's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
From: morristown nj
sounds like this turbo is pretty comparable to a gt35r?
121 is a pretty sick trap. congrats!
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 04:20 PM
  #22  
TURBODAWG's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
From: NC
He has the stock clutch also which makes him take it easy out of the hole. This makes for less "useable" power when you cant go WOT until after the clutch is engaged. The average HP on the run is lower because the RPM's are lower when you baby the launch.

Also Wartalon, you are comparing a 5 speed car with different gearing to your 6 speed car. That adds a little bit to the equation as well. Shifing speed also plays a part in the trap speed as well. I know his car is not shifting very well right now either.

One other thing, he is running out of gear in 4th gear at his 7850 redline, because he is using 225/45/17 tires. They are slightly smalled diameter than the stock size.

I am 90% sure that this dyno is roughly 9 to 10% lower than the dynojet at Topspeed. Reason being there was a car tuned at topspeed that made 42x whp there. It only made 381 whp on this Mustang dyno. Same exact tune, same boost, etc. etc. There is also another car that dynoed at both and it showed similiarly as well.

This mustang definitely doesnt read like Buschurs however.

I am fairly certain his car would be in the 480 to 490 whp range on a dynojet.

My $.02.

Brian
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 04:22 PM
  #23  
nutrulz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: Reno
Where did you get this kit?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 04:22 PM
  #24  
VTECH8TR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: La Isla Del Encanto
Originally Posted by marks03evo
ok well ct9a gsr who dynod at 390 whp trapped 118 and I believe this was a mustang dyno.

This was the Dynojet at Topseed like me : ), not a mustang
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #25  
Jadiem's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
so you got the Greddy kit less the Emanage? that sounds great!! if so, how much money did you save?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 04:34 PM
  #26  
Kuba23's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
From: Central NJ
Originally Posted by nutrulz
Where did you get this kit?
I sold it to him
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 04:39 PM
  #27  
nutrulz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: Reno
Originally Posted by Kuba23
I sold it to him
and where did you get it.? I'm looking for specs and info.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 04:50 PM
  #28  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by marks03evo
ok well Scott from TTP-Engineering trapped I believe 115.5 or so and he dyno'd at ~ 410whp..

also ct9a gsr who dynod at 390 whp trapped 118 and I believe this was a mustang dyno.

so if this guy is trapping 121 id imagine he is 450 whp+ on a dynojet.

I mean we can argue forever on guesstimting what he could make using several different examples, but in the end lets just agree that 121 is a nice trap lol
Yes, that is why I have never believed Scott's claims. He may make 400whp, but people trap 115-116 all the time with ~360whp, so if he really has 400+, then it's the 6spd gearing that is holding him...4th gear hits 111mph at 7600, and he's having to rev it to 8200 just to get his 115, so that may be what's holding back his mph. I'm not so sure, though, because his 1/8th-mile mph is only 1-2 higher than mine, and I'm not even at 350whp. You used Charles as an example when it supports my argument. He did 390whp on the TopSpeed Dynojet and trapped 118, which is exactly in line with what I'm saying. From what you were saying, he'd have to add 60whp to gain 3 more mph, but he would only need 30whp more, which would be 420 as I surmised earlier.

Anyway, as Brian said, there are previously unknown limitations here that are affecting the trap speed by 7-8mph: improper clutch and improper rev limit for such a huge setup. When he gets a proper clutch and raises the rev limit to 8200, then we'll see even more MPH probably...
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 04:54 PM
  #29  
TopSpeed's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by marks03evo
ok well Scott from TTP-Engineering trapped I believe 115.5 or so and he dyno'd at ~ 410whp..

also ct9a gsr who dynod at 390 whp trapped 118 and I believe this was a mustang dyno.

so if this guy is trapping 121 id imagine he is 450 whp+ on a dynojet.

I mean we can argue forever on guesstimting what he could make using several different examples, but in the end lets just agree that 121 is a nice trap lol
The 390hp was on our 424x Dynojet here at the shop which nets cars that trap around 118mph. 330hp nets about 114mph and to run 121mph you would have to dyno around 450hp on our dyno.

Mustang dyno's are great tuning tools but are pretty useless when trying to compare hp number to track times as they never are correct, as the dyno shop can manipulate the numbers to read really high or low.


Edit: don't forget that we aren't just talking about peak hp numbers... anytime you install a larger turbo the peak numbers may remain the same but the hp curves don't drop down as far.. leaving more power in the upper rpms which helps run faster times.

Last edited by TopSpeed; Nov 16, 2005 at 05:00 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 05:05 PM
  #30  
evo8r's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Reno, NV
im around 430whp on a Dyno Jet and i my traps speeds are around 120+mph
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:55 AM.