Is the FQ EVO power to the wheels or crank?
After watching the Top Gear episode, I couldn't understand why someone would want the car other than the fact of the warranty.
The car requires high octane, needs serviced every 5k miles, needs tires every 4k miles and the clutch is either on or off. It appears that the IX with a reflash, exhaust and boost controler has more power than the FQ400.
The car requires high octane, needs serviced every 5k miles, needs tires every 4k miles and the clutch is either on or off. It appears that the IX with a reflash, exhaust and boost controler has more power than the FQ400.
Originally Posted by jayhawker
After watching the Top Gear episode, I couldn't understand why someone would want the car other than the fact of the warranty.
The car requires high octane, needs serviced every 5k miles, needs tires every 4k miles and the clutch is either on or off. It appears that the IX with a reflash, exhaust and boost controler has more power than the FQ400.
The car requires high octane, needs serviced every 5k miles, needs tires every 4k miles and the clutch is either on or off. It appears that the IX with a reflash, exhaust and boost controler has more power than the FQ400.
But the guys in the UK prefer the non FQ400's both for price and performance because that monsters turbo takes forever (relatively speaking) to boost. Daily driven the lower FQ's are easier to live with as they use the 'stock' turbo.
But the FQ400 is no longer for 2006 I believe.
Originally Posted by mathgeek
If the 400 HP is at the crank, that must translate into, oh, about 350 HP at the wheels? That's not that spectacular. People seem to be getting that with a modest investment here in the States. So why pay a gajillion dollars for an FQ400 (if it were available)?
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
From: Del Monte Beach, Monterey, CA
you can also turn up the boost and make major power with some additional tuning.. I made 100whp over stock which puts me close to 400bhp... im sure this car actually makes much more then that.. just like our evo is way underated.
A 2003 evo baselienes 186whp on the properly calibrated bull busting EIP racing dyno.. I managed 283/281 tq. This is why id rather speak in terms of bhp rather then whp, because the number vary greatly from dyno to dyno. A mustang dyno produces your actuall WHP while the dyno jet is more like your bhp.
dont forget the fq has a better suspeion, huge alcon brakes and rotors, and all kinds of HKS goodies.
A 2003 evo baselienes 186whp on the properly calibrated bull busting EIP racing dyno.. I managed 283/281 tq. This is why id rather speak in terms of bhp rather then whp, because the number vary greatly from dyno to dyno. A mustang dyno produces your actuall WHP while the dyno jet is more like your bhp.
dont forget the fq has a better suspeion, huge alcon brakes and rotors, and all kinds of HKS goodies.
Last edited by bdking57; Dec 29, 2005 at 08:24 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ak47po
Evo X Show / Shine
36
Jan 22, 2009 11:44 AM
pjork-master
Evo General
3
Sep 14, 2004 01:08 PM




