Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

EVO9MR vs SRT-8 and Evo9MR vs STI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 11:40 AM
  #61  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Son, huh? So, let's see if you can tell me the STARK difference between these two quotes...

Originally Posted by TForan
So, A VIII put out 168 hp on a Dynojet?

Relax son. 218 is what Buschur dynos the IX at. Minus 50 = 168.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 11:59 AM
  #62  
TForan's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Son, huh? So, let's see if you can tell me the STARK difference between these two quotes...
WTF? One more time. Buschur dynos IX at 218 whp.
You said the VIII has fifty less whp. So, that would be 168 whp,right?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 12:04 PM
  #63  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by TForan
WTF? One more time. Buschur dynos IX at 218 whp.
You said the VIII has fifty less whp. So, that would be 168 whp,right?
Let's try again...

You said:

"So, A VIII put out 168 hp on a Dynojet?"

You then said:

"Relax son. 218 is what Buschur dynos the IX at. Minus 50 = 168."

If you are so uninformed that you don't realize the problem here, then I really can't help you.

I also said this:

"IXs are dyno'ing 270-275whp on Dynojets with 93oct near sea level. 03-04s only did 225-235. You do the math...

If that doesn't make sense, then be advised that IX are consistently trapping 106-107mph on 93oct near sea level while 03/04s only do 102-103mph. Again, do the math."

Lastly, I also said this:

"03/04 Evos run 13.3 with as much as 40-50whp less than IXs"

Don't exaggerate by ONLY pointing out the 50. I gave a range of 40-50. Whether you want to believe it or not, it is true and has happened many times already. Just because you haven't been here to read all the dyno and drag racing threads regarding the 03s, 04s, 05s, and 06s, it doesn't mean you can act like the rest of us didn't see them.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 12:11 PM
  #64  
TForan's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Let's try again...

You said:

"So, A VIII put out 168 hp on a Dynojet?"

You then said:

"Relax son. 218 is what Buschur dynos the IX at. Minus 50 = 168."

If you are so uninformed that you don't realize the problem here, then I really can't help you.

I also said this:

"IXs are dyno'ing 270-275whp on Dynojets with 93oct near sea level. 03-04s only did 225-235. You do the math...

If that doesn't make sense, then be advised that IX are consistently trapping 106-107mph on 93oct near sea level while 03/04s only do 102-103mph. Again, do the math."

Lastly, I also said this:

"03/04 Evos run 13.3 with as much as 40-50whp less than IXs"

Don't exaggerate by ONLY pointing out the 50. I gave a range of 40-50. Whether you want to believe it or not, it is true and has happened many times already. Just because you haven't been here to read all the dyno and drag racing threads regarding the 03s, 04s, 05s, and 06s, it doesn't mean you can act like the rest of us didn't see them.
LOL!You need to relax. Ok I meant Mustang dynos. I'm only going by Buschurs results (218) and your statement about the the 50 whp difference.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 12:14 PM
  #65  
Nez136's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by TForan
LOL!You need to relax. Ok I meant Mustang dynos. I'm only going by Buschurs results (218) and your statement about the the 50 whp difference.
Its obvious the 50whp statement was about dynojets
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 12:20 PM
  #66  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by TForan
LOL!You need to relax. Ok I meant Mustang dynos. I'm only going by Buschurs results (218) and your statement about the the 50 whp difference.
I'm relaxed as can be. I'm responding to you as if you were a kindergartener...very relaxed but with really big letters to help you understand. Buschur has a Mustang Dyno...one that reads lower than any other dyno with much different percentages than Dynojets. Why would you continue to ignore my other statements about the actual Dynojet numbers and trap speed numbers only to continue mentioning Buschur's Mustang Dyno? It makes no sense...
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 12:29 PM
  #67  
TForan's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
I'm relaxed as can be. I'm responding to you as if you were a kindergartener...very relaxed but with really big letters to help you understand. Buschur has a Mustang Dyno...one that reads lower than any other dyno with much different percentages than Dynojets. Why would you continue to ignore my other statements about the actual Dynojet numbers and trap speed numbers only to continue mentioning Buschur's Mustang Dyno? It makes no sense...
I would simply like to know what the VIII dynos on a Mustang if the IX dynos 218. If you don't know that's OK. It's silly to get so worked up and start insulting people. I mean afterall,we're discussing Lancers!
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 12:36 PM
  #68  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by TForan
I would simply like to know what the VIII dynos on a Mustang if the IX dynos 218. If you don't know that's OK. It's silly to get so worked up and start insulting people. I mean afterall,we're discussing Lancers!
I didn't get worked up, nor did I insult you. I'm simply putting things in terms that you can understand (hopefully). You're the one trying to deny everything the rest of us already know. You never once said, "Hey, so what does an 03/04 get on a Mustang Dyno?" No, what you did was try to refute my claim by asking if an 03/04 runs 168 on a dynojet by using Buschur's low-reading MD as a baseline. That was when I had to stoop to a lower level of explanation, one that a child may understand. I apologize if you take that as an insult. I take your unfounded and baseless questioning/argumenting/commenting as an insult to the entire Evo community.

Yeah, we're discussing Lancers. Thanks for showing your true colors finally...
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 12:38 PM
  #69  
EvoIXMR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 0
Ok, Was this december or Novembers magazine? Hope the stands have some left, else I will have to order it
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 12:43 PM
  #70  
freddiet's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Longview tx
when did f-bodys 01 and 02 ever have 300-310 whp. Am i missing something. I never knew that that was possible they must have no drivetrain loss at all.... I guess
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 12:44 PM
  #71  
TForan's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
I didn't get worked up, nor did I insult you. I'm simply putting things in terms that you can understand (hopefully). You're the one trying to deny everything the rest of us already know. You never once said, "Hey, so what does an 03/04 get on a Mustang Dyno?" No, what you did was try to refute my claim by asking if an 03/04 runs 168 on a dynojet by using Buschur's low-reading MD as a baseline. That was when I had to stoop to a lower level of explanation, one that a child may understand. I apologize if you take that as an insult. I take your unfounded and baseless questioning/argumenting/commenting as an insult to the entire Evo community.

Yeah, we're discussing Lancers. Thanks for showing your true colors finally...
I said that I meant a Mustang dyno. A simple mistake. One more time. If a IX puts out 218 on a Mustang, what would a VIII do in your most educated opinion?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 12:45 PM
  #72  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
180-190 on an 03/04 or 200-205 on an 05. You do realize not all VIIIs have the same power, right?. Why are you asking me what I "think" instead of reading the tons of threads where it's already been documented anyway? Hardly any MDs read alike, so it's not even a useful question.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 12:56 PM
  #73  
TForan's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
180-190 on an 03/04 or 200-205 on an 05.
See, now wasn't that easy!
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 01:05 PM
  #74  
Boosted AWD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Damn, I can't believe how much power is added by that new compressor cover. They make power but they also hold more boost then the 03-05's and a little leaner.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 01:10 PM
  #75  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by TForan
See, now wasn't that easy!
Whatever. You didn't ask for that until the very last post. You spend 2 pages arguing with me and now are backtracking after being proven ignorant of the facts.

Also, the numbers I gave you are pretty arbitrary, because that's only on one dyno and don't help you understand anything of importance.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:45 PM.