Share same body/frame with...
Originally Posted by 4ced20v
Thank you captian obvious.. I was just seeing if it was as horrible saftey wise as the normal lancer
http://www.safercar.gov/
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by TheGVR4kid
Guess what....we're all going to die anyway.
If you're so scared of an accident that you'd choose a bucket of shlt mkV Jetta over an Evo, then you're not in the Evo demographic anyway.
I hear the new Camry's are nice, big squishy seats for your moist vagina and lots and lots of airbags.
If you're so scared of an accident that you'd choose a bucket of shlt mkV Jetta over an Evo, then you're not in the Evo demographic anyway.
I hear the new Camry's are nice, big squishy seats for your moist vagina and lots and lots of airbags.
You got them? good
It was a simple question, I do not own a mkv jetta, nor do I own a evo.. I just think its sad that a company would build a car that gets a 40% on a side impact rating and then try to sell it for 30k.. Or hell sell it at all... If you are that worried about the 15lbs that a decent b pillar would add, over the saftey of your friends and family I feel sorry for them.. cheers to those ignorant enough to defend a car that is obviously dangerous, let alone mock me for questioning it.
This alone would make me think twice before buying an evo, as it should all of you, maybe then mitsu would fix thier mistake even if it adds so much weight that it adds .005 seconds for its 0-60
Originally Posted by TheGVR4kid
Guess what....we're all going to die anyway.
If you're so scared of an accident that you'd choose a bucket of shlt mkV Jetta over an Evo, then you're not in the Evo demographic anyway.
I hear the new Camry's are nice, big squishy seats for your moist vagina and lots and lots of airbags.
If you're so scared of an accident that you'd choose a bucket of shlt mkV Jetta over an Evo, then you're not in the Evo demographic anyway.
I hear the new Camry's are nice, big squishy seats for your moist vagina and lots and lots of airbags.
Take it easy... I'm not saying that I agree with this guy or that I support Jetta's or even EVO's for that matter, but it was a simple question with a good intention. So let the guy ask his question and if you dont like the question then dont waste your time commenting in this thread.
Evolving Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: LA CA
Originally Posted by App420
Just because a car is totalled... doesn't mean that the airbags are going to come out. I got my mustang cut in half by a telephone pole w/ no airbag deployment.... in some situations if it is deployed it can make the damage worse, which is why there are certain trigger points.
Originally Posted by 4ced20v
This alone would make me think twice before buying an evo, as it should all of you, maybe then mitsu would fix thier mistake even if it adds so much weight that it adds .005 seconds for its 0-60
Evolving Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: where the 2005 World Series Champions play
i have heard or saw a few evos rolling and no one getting a scratch as well as several front and rear impacts. I few people have been killed in high speed evo accidents, but any car would have had the same outcome considering the speeds they were traveling and what they hit. side impact is the worst on an evo though. don't use that as the end all be all.
Evolving Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: Bay area, Ca
Originally Posted by 4ced20v
It was a simple question, I do not own a mkv jetta, nor do I own a evo.. I just think its sad that a company would build a car that gets a 40% on a side impact rating and then try to sell it for 30k.. Or hell sell it at all... If you are that worried about the 15lbs that a decent b pillar would add, over the saftey of your friends and family I feel sorry for them.. cheers to those ignorant enough to defend a car that is obviously dangerous, let alone mock me for questioning it.
It all boils down to how much you are willing to compromise. The evo is a performance car and that was it was built to do, perform. If the negative aspects of a performance car outweigh your desire to have one, then the Evo is not meant for you.
Newbie
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Santa Barbara(IV), CA/Stamford, CT
Originally Posted by 4ced20v
Wow killer, unknot your panties please, I'll wait.....
You got them? good
It was a simple question, I do not own a mkv jetta, nor do I own a evo.. I just think its sad that a company would build a car that gets a 40% on a side impact rating and then try to sell it for 30k.. Or hell sell it at all... If you are that worried about the 15lbs that a decent b pillar would add, over the saftey of your friends and family I feel sorry for them.. cheers to those ignorant enough to defend a car that is obviously dangerous, let alone mock me for questioning it.
This alone would make me think twice before buying an evo, as it should all of you, maybe then mitsu would fix thier mistake even if it adds so much weight that it adds .005 seconds for its 0-60
You got them? good
It was a simple question, I do not own a mkv jetta, nor do I own a evo.. I just think its sad that a company would build a car that gets a 40% on a side impact rating and then try to sell it for 30k.. Or hell sell it at all... If you are that worried about the 15lbs that a decent b pillar would add, over the saftey of your friends and family I feel sorry for them.. cheers to those ignorant enough to defend a car that is obviously dangerous, let alone mock me for questioning it.
This alone would make me think twice before buying an evo, as it should all of you, maybe then mitsu would fix thier mistake even if it adds so much weight that it adds .005 seconds for its 0-60
then don't get one or if you do get one buy a full autopower roll cage for $1000
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TWM Performance
Lancer How Tos / Installations
3
Nov 3, 2016 01:27 PM
