Low RPM 2 step
Low RPM 2 step
Do you guys think setting the stock "2 step" to 3-3.5k rpms is enough for an acceptable launch ~1.9 60' ?
Is that enought to pull a smooth launch no bogging, and minimal slippage to avoid glazing?
Is that enought to pull a smooth launch no bogging, and minimal slippage to avoid glazing?
Well, I was trying to launch the other day. I can successfully do a good street launch at 4.3k rpms. But at 3k rpms I was bogging and it was not a good launch at all.
Holding 3k rpms to launch w/out a 2 step your not really holding any boost at all. The way I see it is if I set 2 step at 3k wouldnt that build boost? If so as long as there is boost it should launch decently with out bogging right? (hope you guys see the logic in my opinion on this)
Holding 3k rpms to launch w/out a 2 step your not really holding any boost at all. The way I see it is if I set 2 step at 3k wouldnt that build boost? If so as long as there is boost it should launch decently with out bogging right? (hope you guys see the logic in my opinion on this)
Trending Topics
You are not launching well at 4.3k, and you can't even THINK about launching at 3-3.5k. It would require about 3 seconds of clutch slip, which would kill your clutch in record time. Why would you even want to do such a thing? The 2-step at 3k bounces extremely slow like the car is dying, so there is no load to build any boost. Also, it's not the stationary boost that gives you a good launch anyway. People have just become enamored with the whole "building boost" phenomenon now that we have launch control. Noobs either forget or never even knew that many of us were hitting 1.6s before we even could control the 2-step.
You are not launching well at 4.3k, and you can't even THINK about launching at 3-3.5k. It would require about 3 seconds of clutch slip, which would kill your clutch in record time. Why would you even want to do such a thing? The 2-step at 3k bounces extremely slow like the car is dying, so there is no load to build any boost. Also, it's not the stationary boost that gives you a good launch anyway. People have just become enamored with the whole "building boost" phenomenon now that we have launch control. Noobs either forget or never even knew that many of us were hitting 1.6s before we even could control the 2-step.
Oh and I was not doing 3 second slips, that would probably glaze the clutch or something. The only reason I mentioned the building boost is because at lower rpms you dont have power with out boost, and with boost it should give some power to move from the hole.
Thanks,
Very true but I want to last this clutch as long as possible and still have some fun before replacing it.
But very important I do not want to make or break any records. I'm happy with a 1.9 60' while performing a safer launch.
But very important I do not want to make or break any records. I'm happy with a 1.9 60' while performing a safer launch.
you will never see 1.9 60' launching @ 3k rpm's. just lern how to do it correctly @ higher rpm's and you wont break anything.Trying to make boost and slip the clutch @ 3k is useless and will kill you clutch way faster than a quick slip launch @ 5k-6k
I think if you launch at a higher rpm properly the clutch will last longer then slipping at a lower rpm







Im aiming for 1.6 1.7 at least. 6k FTW