Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Low RPM 2 step

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 09:25 PM
  #16  
blackevoguy's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: IL
For the street 5k to 6k is alright but at the track i would say 6k or above i usually launch at 5500 on the street and 6500 at the track. All i have is an act hdss clutch all the other drive line parts are stock and i havent had any problems *knock on wood* theres no reason to even have it set that low theres no point

Theres also no need to slip a clutch when launching and i dont mean just dump the clutch either
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 08:03 PM
  #17  
BluEVOIX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 61
From: FL
Originally Posted by blackevoguy
For the street 5k to 6k is alright but at the track i would say 6k or above i usually launch at 5500 on the street and 6500 at the track. All i have is an act hdss clutch all the other drive line parts are stock and i havent had any problems *knock on wood* theres no reason to even have it set that low theres no point

Theres also no need to slip a clutch when launching and i dont mean just dump the clutch either
Well whats most important to me is the clutch rather than performing the best launch. I know the best thing is not to launch but I'm just trying to find a medium point of launching and wear.

The way I saw it was lower rpm's = less of a bad friction on the clutch and the higher the rpm = more friction. But apparently you guys are telling me lower rpms will cause more wear because it would require an extended slip of the clutch.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 09:01 PM
  #18  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Yes, due to more friction. I don't know why you thought lower rpm would mean less friction. There's no power that low to get the car moving, thus requiring a long burning destruction of the clutch.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 09:51 PM
  #19  
BluEVOIX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 61
From: FL
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Yes, due to more friction. I don't know why you thought lower rpm would mean less friction. There's no power that low to get the car moving, thus requiring a long burning destruction of the clutch.

Well i thought less friction because lower rpms = slower rotations and vise versa for higher rpms. Pretty much like rubbing your hand on the carpet slowly vs rubbing your hand on the carp quickly. But I understand what you guys are saying about lower rpms requiring long slipping of the clutch = bad.

Just for the record, I only slipped the clutch a tad bit, like no more than a second. That is why 3k rpms launch caused the car to bog and the 4.3k rpm launch was successful but not as quick as I'd like it to be. If I had to time it I'd say the slip lasted no more than a second and I only launched 4-5 times max that night.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RalliAaron
09+ Ralliart Engine/Turbo/Drivetrain
6
May 23, 2012 10:16 AM
audiofan
Evo General
1
Apr 3, 2011 05:36 PM
freshevo8
ECU Flash
16
May 7, 2010 05:38 PM
flyguycfi
Driving Techniques
26
Apr 11, 2010 06:39 PM
ty_evo8
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
18
Oct 29, 2007 06:09 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:08 AM.