Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central
View Poll Results: Which is the best option? Type S or EVO.
Youre crazy to invest that much into a Type S when you could have an EVO.
51
92.73%
Type S is the way to go.
4
7.27%
Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll

EVO or RSX Type S? Why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #16  
DJmarkymark's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: La Jolla CA
Originally Posted by kinloch99
since when when do sti's mod better and cheaper then evos, u have it backwards sti's are more expensive to mod then evos. as far as this dumb thread, dont buy a car that u will be buried under, u should know your budget, if u dont earn a good paycheck and have 5 grand in the bank as FU money and like to **** money away parting then dont get an evo.
he was obviously joking
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #17  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Evo, because its better in every important way.

Scorke
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 01:12 PM
  #18  
jaydm73's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Socal/Norcal
Originally Posted by aznRice
How can he not like evos? If I could have sex with it, I would. I was thinking about the same thing but the rsx-s would be my dd. I trashed that idea a while ago.
haha i know what u mean. but not everyone likes the evo
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #19  
Zeller's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Bloomington, Illinois
Honda's are a waste of time and money if you are going to try and mod one. A bunch of my friends use to be into honda's and after all the modding they had done at the end of the day it was still a slow FWD car that could even come close to matching a stock EVO (or STI for that matter)! Honda=great DD.....just not great performance!! IMO
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 02:26 PM
  #20  
Evolved Monkey's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
From: New York
I wouldn't even consider buying a used car with 90K miles unless it is a classic and I planned on restoring it. Not only is the drivetrain worn out, the suspension bushings, arms, joints are as well. Then theres the problem with rust eating away everything.
It might be ok for a trip around town, but if your friend is going to race the car then there will most likely be problems.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 02:41 PM
  #21  
nightwalker's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 3
From: Butt**** Nowhere
don't write off Hondas. I have friends with Hondas that would spank 90% of the Evos on this board.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 02:48 PM
  #22  
derangedazn's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 0
From: VA
straights or curvy roads?
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 02:55 PM
  #23  
UT_Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 0
From: SL,UT
Uh, neither of your two options, I think he should have what he likes... And yes, it is possible not to like Evos, they're great, but they're not THAT amazing.

For the 17k or 18k or whatever I'd buy a 5k Civic hatch and do 10k of work on it For a track car that is... For a daily driver/part-time racer I'd pick whichever I enjoyed most and whichever I wanted more. (And there's the insurance, maintenence, gas, and getting approved for the car, and finding a used Evo in good enough shape but beat up enough to be only worth 18k... Just FYI I TRADED mine in for 18.5k, it was an '03 with 52k miles... and that's trade-in)
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 02:56 PM
  #24  
johnguam's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
i highly doubt u can find an Evo 8 that's in great condition for 18K. If you did, someone would have bought it the minute it was listed.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 04:45 PM
  #25  
sonicnofadz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 3
From: Baltimore, MD
Get the Evo. FWD is inferior and you know it. Why spend all that money on a fwd honda when in the end it will still be slow around turns and tractionless? Besides, its so easy to make power with the 4G63, you just look at it the wrong way and it makes more power. Heres a tip: if you do get the Evo and proceed to drive it in the New England winter, get the chassis professionally undercoated or it will rust out the entire underbody after a few years.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 06:22 PM
  #26  
eVo_Boi's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: ATL
1. Too many people here own an RSX.
2. The Evo is just an all around "more awesome" car.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 06:42 PM
  #27  
Vigo's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BlueByYouuu
The point is, for a little extra youre getting a TON extra... comparing the two...

Type S with all those mods

14 second car, if you can hook up... if it rains theres no power thats useable, sand same thing, snow NO way... It still handles like FWD coilovers or not...

or an EVO

those mods, low 13 second to high 12s... handling *speaks for itself* $2-3000 in BRAKES... USEABLE power.
Why do you care so much about what car he will purchase? Are you his girlfriend? Only girls do what you're trying do. Lame.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 06:53 PM
  #28  
supermech21's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: usa
well he already made the decision so im kind of confused on why you posted...also, i dont even think its a question, NA vs Turbo....FWD vs AWD...and to be honest with you the evo ix(or an viii with newer bumper) looks like sex so i dont even think styling can take it...all in all i still have to say, stupid thread
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 06:59 PM
  #29  
kaonashi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 2
From: Port Arthur, TX
Delete this thread this is not even a good comparisson
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 07:07 PM
  #30  
LancerOZ Boy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville Florida
Originally Posted by BlueByYouuu
Alright well my friend has a 2003 Acura RSX Type S, with 83,000 miles on it. He bought it for $13,000. His intentions where to have a decent, not so expensive car to do some minor stuff to over time and keep it simple... and get into an apartment. Welllll that didn't happen. Since he bought it 2 months ago he is still living at home and has done the following...

-Cat-Back $550
-Used CAI $175
-Hawks pads $170
-ADR Wheels $660
-Springs $200 + 180 install
-Shocks are junk so he is getting coilovers $800-1000
-Short throw $100 *I think*

and the mods to follow are...

-Race header... $300
-Hondata KPro $950
-Tune... whatever it comes out to $200?

All in all a $13,000 car turned into a total investment of hmm... $17,000

Situation 1:

2003 Acura RSX Type S w/83,000 miles. Total investment $17000 when all is said and done... the car at this level makes 215whp, is still FWD... and we live in Maine...

Situation 2:

2003-04 EVO VIII $18,000...+ Flash $400 + TBE $500 = 275 ALL wheel hp, a car that handled as well as alot of exotics... usable power in rain... shine...snow *kinda but its fun*... Brembo brakes...

I am trying to tell him that such an investment into a FWD car when you live in Maine or you don't live in Maine... considering for only a couple grand more at best you can have something 50 times better. Is crazy not to... his excuse is "maintinence is more expensive"... "gas too"... pff, he puts super in the Type S and he gets 20-23... ooo he saved 3 mpg
Why are you bashing your friend here on the forums? Everyone here will clearly pick an EVO over a rsx.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:05 PM.