Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Why did you pick the EVO over the STi?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2007 | 01:38 AM
  #211  
Heshan's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Oakland, California
Out in Cali, and especially the Bay Area, everyone and their grandma drives either a STi or WRX. Granted there are a lot of Evos as well, but I don't see one every hour I'm out on the road.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2007 | 10:16 AM
  #212  
fatcircles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Hartford, CT
Originally Posted by Heshan
Out in Cali, and especially the Bay Area, everyone and their grandma drives either a STi or WRX. Granted there are a lot of Evos as well, but I don't see one every hour I'm out on the road.
Thats very true, I saw alot the past several years I was in the bay area, but not here in dallas
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2007 | 10:46 AM
  #213  
EV0lved's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: wishing i still lived in Spokane
Originally Posted by chrsevx
I decided to buy an evo for its engine strength and stock turbo power potential with mods, and of coarse better handling than an sti.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 06:06 PM
  #214  
machtwo's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
I thought the evo was more comfortable to drive, the interior looks better and the cars steering felt so much better. Plus I didn't want to work in an STI engine bay or with the motor
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 06:19 PM
  #215  
hytek369's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (81)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
i thought the evo was edgier and handles better.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 06:26 PM
  #216  
damstr's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 703
Likes: 10
From: AA County, MD
Originally Posted by subrwho
Evo looks more aggressive, cheaper to mod and make fast.
Yep that pretty much somes it up for me.

I mean a stage 2 STI is like 280-300hp...Stage 1 for an Evo is about 330hp.

I walked a stage 2 STI this past weekend and it made me even happier that I went with the Evo.

Plus I got a good deal on my MR. $32.5k
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #217  
fatcircles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Hartford, CT
Originally Posted by damstr
Yep that pretty much somes it up for me.

I mean a stage 2 STI is like 280-300hp...Stage 1 for an Evo is about 330hp.

I walked a stage 2 STI this past weekend and it made me even happier that I went with the Evo.

Plus I got a good deal on my MR. $32.5k
Stage 2 STIs are not 280-300 hp, they have 300 hp stock. If you meant Wheel horsepower then that depends on what dyno you are talking about. But then again if you are talking about wheel horsepower a Stage 1 EVO is definitely not making 330whp. Evo 8's with cams are barely making 300 whp on Mustang dynos.

I watched EVOs getting tuned at SpeedElement/MPJ Performance for about 8 weeks straight this summer and that was the norm.

Just looking at your Sig I can see how that does not make any sense. You are not even making 330 and you are stage 2 with a Fuel Pump and boost controller along with a tune, so I don't get where you came up with what you said earlier.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 09:39 PM
  #218  
BluEVOIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 61
From: FL
Originally Posted by fatcircles
Stage 2 STIs are not 280-300 hp, they have 300 hp stock. If you meant Wheel horsepower then that depends on what dyno you are talking about. But then again if you are talking about wheel horsepower a Stage 1 EVO is definitely not making 330whp. Evo 8's with cams are barely making 300 whp on Mustang dynos.

I watched EVOs getting tuned at SpeedElement/MPJ Performance for about 8 weeks straight this summer and that was the norm.

Just looking at your Sig I can see how that does not make any sense. You are not even making 330 and you are stage 2 with a Fuel Pump and boost controller along with a tune, so I don't get where you came up with what you said earlier.
What about Evo 9 ? From what I've been reading here, turboback exhaust+MBC+filter+good tune= ~330 hp. (I think it was awhp)

Also: http://www.amsperformance.com/store/...roducts_id=897
Automotosports stage one for Mitsubishi Evolution IX is the first step in improving the performance of your Evo bringing it up from the stock 286HP to around 345 to 365 HP on 93 octane.
I think 365 crank horsepower is close to 330 all wheel horse power?

******Of course it all depends on the type of dyno used********

the reasons why I chose evo over the STI are:

-Looks better (my opinion)
-Evo stock handling > STI
-Interior space (rear compartmentis larger in the EVO than the STI)

I like how the new STI's look, but the best one is the P1 STI and the worst is the 2004 model year.

Last edited by BluEVOIX; Oct 23, 2007 at 09:42 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 09:58 PM
  #219  
fatcircles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Hartford, CT
Originally Posted by BluEVOIX
What about Evo 9 ? From what I've been reading here, turboback exhaust+MBC+filter+good tune= ~330 hp. (I think it was awhp)

Also: http://www.amsperformance.com/store/...roducts_id=897

I think 365 crank horsepower is close to 330 all wheel horse power?

******Of course it all depends on the type of dyno used********

the reasons why I chose evo over the STI are:

-Looks better (my opinion)
-Evo stock handling > STI
-Interior space (rear compartmentis larger in the EVO than the STI)

I like how the new STI's look, but the best one is the P1 STI and the worst is the 2004 model year.
Yea, the EVO 9 definitely has more power than the 8, I was just saying

And I don't know how much the EVOs powertrain loss is but for the STi that puts out 300 crank HP the mustang dynos usually put them down around 215 awhp which is a huge amount less. The reason you might not see Stage 2 STis hitting 300 whp is because of these dynos
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 10:05 PM
  #220  
Bounty Hunter's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Inside the Sarlacc Pit
Originally Posted by fatcircles
Yea, the EVO 9 definitely has more power than the 8, I was just saying
Yet another reason I sold the STi and later bought an EVO IX. I also like the looks and potential of the IX over the 8.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 10:20 PM
  #221  
fatcircles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Hartford, CT
Originally Posted by Bounty Hunter
Yet another reason I sold the STi and later bought an EVO IX. I also like the looks and potential of the IX over the 8.
Yep, I only wish I test drove an EVO before I bought the STi
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 10:25 PM
  #222  
impreza2darksyd's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 201
Likes: 1
From: CenCal coast w91pisss
^ at least its not a honda
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 10:59 PM
  #223  
Bounty Hunter's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Inside the Sarlacc Pit
Originally Posted by fatcircles
Yep, I only wish I test drove an EVO before I bought the STi
I'm not trying to knock the STi. It was a great car for me. I was very fast with it at the AutoX and roadcourse. Oh and I still can't launch my EVO like I did my STi. Since I've gotten a few AutoXs under my belt in the EVO I'm getting used to it and it feels better to me. Stock for stock I felt like I had to really fight the STi to do what I wanted with it (handling) whereas the EVO is point and shoot. The EVO can attack a corner with more speed, but the STi felt a little more powerful coming out of low speed corners (low end torque).

One of the turning points for me was at one of my last AutoXs with my STi. After my 4 runs for the day a guy with a stock EVO 8 MR and I swapped cars for a "fun run." I had NEVER driven an EVO in my life...we didn't launch each others' cars and we both took turns riding with each other. I still beat my best time in my STi by a full second in the EVO on a 30.X second course. That really opened my eyes to the EVO. The car did what I asked it to do when I turned the steering wheel.

I was a fan of both Subaru and Mitsu from their WRC roots. As far as looks go...I've always liked the JDM EVO VII. When we got the USDM 8 I was a little dissapointed in the looks (Pontiac looking front). The IX reminds me of the VII with a similar front clip...now I like the IX better than the VII (but the VII tails are the only ones to have IMO).

Either way both cars compliment each other. They make for a great rivalry and continue to keep both Mitsu and Subaru on their toes. I think ultimately it comes down to personal preference. Who knows...maybe the new STi will be better than the EVO X. Only time will tell.

Last edited by Bounty Hunter; Oct 23, 2007 at 11:25 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 11:07 PM
  #224  
diegoalunan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
lovethe looks mod friendly(cheaper)..
and since i was a kid..i fellinlovewith the evo... now im living the dream of having one... and imloving every singleday of having my evo...haha sounds cheesy but true
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 11:26 PM
  #225  
bkuddah's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Aurora, CO
too many wrx here in CO
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:54 PM.