Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

My dyno tune results...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 05:50 PM
  #31  
AznEvoIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Originally Posted by Burklow
I like that quote.

You're numbers are pretty good for the dyno. If you want bragging numbers, go use a dynojet.
^ /agree
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 05:53 PM
  #32  
Sky Evo X's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MR Dan
The car ran like crap after i installed the injectors so the tuner had to scale them and started tuning immediately without a baseline run.... but the overall power gains i felt on my butt dyno is remarkable.
Should have saved that money for a meth kit. You won't be running out of fuel anytime soon.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 05:54 PM
  #33  
Paikman GTR's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: 703
With all those mods if you dont trap 115

i would def check out compression on the motor or check the turbo.
cuz it def should make more than that

lol
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 05:55 PM
  #34  
596736's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 1
From: NNJ
more pics of you car. Why did you upgrade the injectors
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 06:01 PM
  #35  
Harman Motive's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Torrance, CA
Originally Posted by Mitch@VividRacing
I could be wrong but isn't it supposed to be 15.1? 14 is not right at least on my Mustang. Not a big deal just curious.

Nice numbers either way.

Mitch M
Hey Mitch,

I use the Mustang guide for reference, but prefer these setting for tuning in 4th gear. On my dyno it gives the best approximation of street conditions for the Evo.

Were you able to get that car sorted before the timeattack?

- Dan
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 06:07 PM
  #36  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,093
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by Sky Evo X

WIth your mods and 24 psi putting down only 295/287 is a dissapointment.
No, that is pretty much in-line with a properly set-up mustang, those mods and 91 octane.

Some are stronger, some are weaker.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 06:15 PM
  #37  
MR Dan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: S.Cali
As requested.... more pics



This is actually my 2nd Evo 9 MR. My previous one was tuned by some so-called well known shop which resulted in 310WHP/300 ft-lb/TQ on their dynojet with similar mods and STOCK BBS wheels, however my intention with this car is for track use, not drag racing. I really dont care for the #'s on the dyno charts since I can feel the big gains where it counts....
Thanks again Scott and Harman Motive

Last edited by MR Dan; Apr 7, 2008 at 06:35 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 06:15 PM
  #38  
Sky Evo X's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Tomei exh. manifold
Tomei DP
Tomei O2 housing
Fujitsubo exhaust w/ muffler delete
LICP, Apexi cone filter
HKS intake box
RC750cc injectors
Walbro 255FP

And you think less then 300whp is in line?

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=336191

Buchur's mustang has long been known as one of the lowest reading mustang dynos.

He got 302/305 on a EVO8 with less mods then you have. lol.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 06:17 PM
  #39  
Sky Evo X's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MR Dan
As requested.... more pics



This is actually my 2nd Evo 9 MR. My previous one was tuned by some so-called well known shop which resulted in 310WHP/300 ft-lb/TQ on their dynojet with the similar mods, however my intention of this car is for track use, not drag racing. I really dont care for the #'s on the dyno charts since I can feel the big gains, believe it or not..

Thanks again Scott and Harman Motive
There we go from the owner's mouth. 310/300 on a dynojet with similar mods.
Your car's power is waaaayyy below what it should be.

A well tuned car is tuned for ANY condition.

Last edited by Sky Evo X; Apr 7, 2008 at 06:19 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 06:23 PM
  #40  
MR Dan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: S.Cali
I did not expect this thread to be "show off your dyno #'s"... I really didnt need to post the chart, just wanted to say the great experience I had with this tune...

...and yes, this is on 91 Oct. with heavy 18in wheels....

Last edited by MR Dan; Apr 7, 2008 at 09:55 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 06:35 PM
  #41  
Sky Evo X's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
My 280 on the DD was on Cali 91 as well.

I'm just saying for the amount of money you put into the car it should be making more power. Especially at 24psi tapering to 19...

PM TTP, Buschur, Al, Shiv, or any of the reputable tuners on this board, or even post your map on in the ECUFlash forums. I bet there is another 20+whp to be found easily.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 06:36 PM
  #42  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,093
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by Sky Evo X
Tomei exh. manifold
Tomei DP
Tomei O2 housing
Fujitsubo exhaust w/ muffler delete
LICP, Apexi cone filter
HKS intake box
RC750cc injectors
Walbro 255FP

And you think less then 300whp is in line?

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=336191

Buchur's mustang has long been known as one of the lowest reading mustang dynos.

He got 302/305 on a EVO8 with less mods then you have. lol.
Yes for those mods on 91oct, on HM's mustang, it is in-line. You can whip your e-pen all you want but it is what it is. Step back from the evo-m fog a couple steps.

Some Evo 9's do 290, some do 320 with the same type of mods on our dyno. Every car is different, again, some stronger, some weaker. People that work with these cars ever day understand this a little bit more than others.

Quoting another evo from another dyno, across the country, on different gas... is irrelevant to this thread.

Volley fire back all you want.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 06:44 PM
  #43  
Sky Evo X's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
I've worked on car for a very long time, and probably tuned much more cars then you have. I've tuned over 50 different Evos on a dynapack for the shop I used to work at. All baselining around 260 and ending up north of 320whp with basic mods with several topping 350whp.

Just because I don't post on the forums much doesn't mean I don't know what I'm talking about.

You say every car is different, some stronger some weaker. I agree and his at it's current state is weaker. How many stock evolutions have you dyno'd personally and then retuned? Out of the 50+ I did almost every single one baselined right in line with the others.

And if it is your shop that did the work, why did he install 750 injectors?

But I can't argue with your point that under 300whp tuned at your shop is in line. It is your shop and since its probably the same tuner, you will probably get the same results.

Originally Posted by razorlab
We use 15.1 as well on our mustang, and 3500lbs.

I've messed around with the HP@50 numbers a bunch to see if they changed anything. They don't really that much, however it does change the ramp of load, etc.

The thing that does change the numbers is the weight, and of course messing with the roller weights, etc.

Either way the numbers seem pretty in-line for a Evo 9 with those mods. At least from what I have seen on our dyno.
The weight does change the numbers and unless you or the tuner weights 300 pounds, why do you use 3500?

Last edited by Sky Evo X; Apr 7, 2008 at 07:00 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #44  
cssaddictm4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Cape Cod, MA
Strong numbers...looks like they have their dyno in a vault...they must really like it.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 07:07 PM
  #45  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,093
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by Sky Evo X
I've worked on car for a very long time, and probably tuned much more cars then you have. I've tuned over 50 different Evos on a dynapack for the shop I used to work at. All baselining around 260 and ending up north of 320whp with basic mods with several topping 350whp.

Just because I don't post on the forums much doesn't mean I don't know what I'm talking about.

You say every car is different, some stronger some weaker. I agree and his at it's current state is weaker. How many stock evolutions have you dyno'd personally and then retuned? Out of the 50+ I did almost every single one baselined right in line with the others.

And if it is your shop that did the work, why did he install 750 injectors?

But I can't argue with your point that under 300whp tuned at your shop is in line. It is your shop and since its probably the same tuner, you will probably get the same results.



The weight does change the numbers and unless you or the tuner weights 300 pounds, why do you use 3500?

And I dont know why you say "Either way the numbers seem pretty in-line for a Evo 9 with those mods. Atleast from what I have seen on our dyno."



According to yourself, that is irrelevant unless this is your shop.
Well I can tell this will just keep going down the abyss so this is my last post in this thread.

First off, the owner seems to be happy, which is #1 priority.

The tuner stated earlier in this thread that Evo 9's baseline around 215whp on this mustang. 80whp gains sounds about right with the mods listed and tune from my experience.

Not my shop that did the tune, work or installed the injectors. In fact I work at a competing shop in California. Imagine that, a tuner from a competing shop trying to calm the noise in a thread about another competing shop. From my experience, most Evo 9's with the mods listed come close to maxing out the stock injectors, especially if ecu-boost is being used, which can hold more boost up top. The other thing I saw noted is this guy wants to track his car, so upgrading the injectors gives him a nice headroom for when things get really hot at the track or when temp compensation kicks in and richens up the fuel mixture, which would cause IDC's to increase.

I'm not going to play e-pen light sabers with you on numbers of evos tuned under my belt. It's just ridiculous.

The weight used on a mustang is for proper loading, and doesn't always mean a 1:1 with the actual weight of the vehicle.

Again, the owner seems to be happy, which is #1 priority. And 80whp gains ain't too shabby either.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:27 AM.