Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Highest Mileage Built motors and turbos??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 08:05 AM
  #1  
Broham's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 820
Likes: 2
From: va
Highest Mileage Built motors and turbos??

I never see this information much often on here. I wanted to make an easy to access thread for information on how many miles you all have put on your built motors and or turbos.

Example: br 2.0 / je pistons etc 30800 miles and going
TurbO: pt 6265: 8000 miles no issues etc.

I figure this might help out folks like me who wonder about this. Thanks and I hope to see somee hiiiiigh numbers
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 08:39 AM
  #2  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
This is a good thread however, the mileage will be all over the place. Usually the higher HP builds won't last as long as a built motor with a stock turbo. I would be very happy if my motor makes it to 50k. The main thing with a high HP built motor is monitoring your bearings. I expect ill change my bearings every 15-20k.

English Racing 2.4LR 10.5:1 MIVEC motor. Wiseco HD 87mm 1.13ch w/ 156mm GSC Ibeams slinging around 100mm crank at 8650 rpms.

8K miles so far and no problems. Running 6.5 quarts of 20w50 Brad Penn. I change the oil between 2-3k miles depending on how much wear the oil has had. I won't go over 3k miles on oil since I run E85 99% of the time.

Mikey

Last edited by BLKCarbonEVO; Feb 24, 2011 at 06:36 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 08:47 AM
  #3  
Broham's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 820
Likes: 2
From: va
is it due to your compression being higher or the fp black? the acl race bearings need to be replaced that often? If so what does that entail for you? pulling the head, pistons etc and replacing the race bearings? damn man that seems like some maintenance i didnt think of
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 08:50 AM
  #4  
Dallas J's Avatar
EvoM Guru
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,967
Likes: 810
From: Portland, Or
That, and 700+ hp. We have tiny little bearings in our cars and more power ends up requiring more frequent replacement since they take a lot of the beatings.

You could go to an alum rod motor to absorb the bearing abuse, but then there's other issues with that.

My home built 2.4l in my talon has about 15k miles 50% of the time on E85 and 25psi on an EvoIII. Still running strong.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 08:59 AM
  #5  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
Originally Posted by Broham
is it due to your compression being higher or the fp black? the acl race bearings need to be replaced that often? If so what does that entail for you? pulling the head, pistons etc and replacing the race bearings? damn man that seems like some maintenance i didnt think of
Well to start with, I always play everything safe... a motor making over 600-700whp tends to beat bearings within 20k miles. But saying that I also have to point out this would be with a steal rod motor. The heavier the rods the quicker you will beat your bearings to death. That is the reason for a lot of people wanting to do alluniman rod motors.

The other factors that you have to address when making a motor last is tq, timing (high timing means high cylinder pressure), and load in low rpms. It is important that people understand that there is no such thing as an indestructible motor...

Not a lot of labor, it is pretty easy to press in new rod bearings. Those tend to be the ones that go first and take a built motor out.

Mikey

Last edited by BLKCarbonEVO; Feb 24, 2011 at 06:37 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 09:04 AM
  #6  
Broham's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 820
Likes: 2
From: va
this would explain why aaron said he used h beams since they hold up but aren't that heavy like the turbo tuff rod. I understand now.

So if a motor had a very graduallll curve and a slow climing flat tq curve with h beam rod and un aggressive timing, your motor would have a better chance of lasting correct?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 09:07 AM
  #7  
evo8nyc's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: NOWHERE, NY
Interesting thread keep it coming, I've seen the Buschur shortblock tear down on YouTube, 20k n still lookin brand spanking new
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 09:22 AM
  #8  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
Originally Posted by Broham
this would explain why aaron said he used h beams since they hold up but aren't that heavy like the turbo tuff rod. I understand now.

So if a motor had a very graduallll curve and a slow climing flat tq curve with h beam rod and un aggressive timing, your motor would have a better chance of lasting correct?
For the most part that is correct however, most h beams are limited by tq... 500+tq tends to break h beams over time. Aaron is running a big turbo so his tq is lower. That is why he chose h beams. What makes our cars different, if we both had 800hp I would feel a lot more comfortable pushing my motor over 550tq and it would stay together better in higher rpms.

Mikey
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 09:28 AM
  #9  
Broham's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 820
Likes: 2
From: va
id max at 450 tq for me and a gradual band. so after 8k miles you're doing fine with no issues i see. Are you using a cometic head gasket for the 2.4 or are you using ams? what are your thoughts on the l19 headstuds? do you find that the standard arp headstuds stretch under that kind of power?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 09:32 AM
  #10  
buchnerj's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 2
From: the burgh, pa
Engine: BR 2.1L, Manley I beams and Manley BR coated pistons.
Turbo: FP Red

Making 550/500 on a Dyno Dynamics.

~7,000 miles and counting
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 09:40 AM
  #11  
Broham's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 820
Likes: 2
From: va
those are high numbers since dd read low as hell where i live. that is very impressive from a red. what fuel and boost is this on?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 09:48 AM
  #12  
bbyevo8u's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 2
From: NY
great thread keep the good info coming!!

i'd like to see how the 2.3 guys are doing

Last edited by bbyevo8u; Feb 21, 2011 at 09:54 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 10:01 AM
  #13  
dastallion951's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 3
From: riverside, ca
so far pump gas built engine: 2.0 see mods
64mm fp red stock oil feed line
27 psi peak daily on 91 octane
15k miles and counting
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 10:13 AM
  #14  
Broham's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 820
Likes: 2
From: va
i wonder how come you built the motor for your red? do you feel the red @ 91 octane was making too much tq?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 10:56 AM
  #15  
sho669's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 741
Likes: 1
From: Humboldt/Sac County, CA
Originally Posted by Broham
i wonder how come you built the motor for your red? do you feel the red @ 91 octane was making too much tq?
Has to do with torque and how it's made. The "smaller" stock framed turbos can create torque brutally fast...stock rods don't like that!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:29 PM.