372 Whp

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jan 15, 2004 | 12:17 PM

#61

MP5

In Timeout

iTrader: (4)

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 1,750

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally posted by TURBODAWG

I wonder how much power you could make in 1st gear then????

The 25HP increase defeats many laws of physics. Oh well, what did those old farts know anyhow.

If all Mustang dyno's do this, then they have a fundamental flaw in their design. If thats the case, then the Dynojet is definitely the more accurate of the two.

Brian

You have to be able to get full load so 1st wont work but Ive got the sheets

Jan 15, 2004 | 12:24 PM

#62

TURBODAWG

Evolved Member

iTrader: (54)

Joined: Jan 2003

Posts: 1,181

Likes: 0

From: NC

I am not saying I don't believe you. I said that this would mean there is a fundamental design problem with the Mustang dynos. Meaning that their numbers may be from MARS as well. That is all. Can you get full load in 2nd gear then? I would think so. Give that a shot next time.

Brian

Jan 15, 2004 | 10:06 PM

#63

EVOVIIIU

Evolving Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts: 199

Likes: 0

From: GEORGIA

Where are the slipz already???

Jan 15, 2004 | 10:50 PM

#64

chronohunter

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Dec 2002

Posts: 1,767

Likes: 0

From: Boulder, Co.

Quote:

Originally posted by SaitouhHajime
The 398 run WAS with the Ntercooler sprayer, my run without the sprayer was 344 WHP 351 Torque. I don't really understand why everyone insist's on flaming, I will post dyno chart's as soon as I find someone to scan them for me. I'm not bull****ting here. I don't know about the correction or whatnot, but I will ask next time I get a chance.

I think the reason is that you didn't list the sprayer in your mods

You, in a way, are responsible for the flaming you received. Look back to yesterday and I posted I thought you must have been using a N20 sprayer that was the only explanation. BTW nice numbers WITHOUT the N20. Stage 1+ cars turned 345/360 numbers on the same dyno back in December

Jan 13, 2006 | 08:55 AM

#65

Soon2BEVO

Evolved Member

iTrader: (41)

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 4,653

Likes: 0

From: Toms River, NJ

398 on 91? Ok.

Jan 13, 2006 | 09:08 AM

#66

IMR-TIM

Evolved Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 542

Likes: 0

From: NH

I just read every post in this thread. He's had plenty of time to post up the slips. Back it up buddy

....tick tock, tick tock, tick tock.....we're all waiting

Jan 13, 2006 | 09:23 AM

#67

geminibby

Evolving Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 167

Likes: 0

From: Virgina Beach, VA

I found this interesting. Granted, i'm not very versed in the turbo = xhp, but i hope not everyone is basing this off stock turbo numbers. I read and was questioning as well, but in his signature he has listed a RNR GT35R turbo kit. I read that this turbo really doesnt come alive til youre over 24 psi and he stated he was running 21. I also understand that he was running 91 vice 93 or higher and I honestly dont know what the expected HP would be with those. just my .02

Jan 13, 2006 | 09:40 AM

#68

Raginrok

Newbie

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts: 1

Likes: 0

I'll vouch for the dyno that SaitouhHajime is on. Its the same one I use and Nick (the tuner at Mac) is awsome. My buddy with just a TBE and ECU in his 05 STi was tuned by Nick on the same dyno that SaitouHajime is using and was able to pull 300hp and about 340tq. No other mods. So I wouldn't cry BS on this untill the dyno sheets are posted.