what do you guys think ?

 

Cat or testpipe?

nice numbers!

 

.

 

no cat its test pipe

 

Those are great numbers Weird how jagged the graph is though on the right of the curve; is the ECU pulling timing for some reason?

 

Are those air/fuel ratios accurate? If so that is LEAN yikes

 

Air/Fuel does look lean. EVO_toy, is this corrected? Is the mods you have on your signature.

 

that the only mods I have ...

 

This dyno must be reading higher than others or it's not WHP but at the crank? Most Evo make around 230WHP stock and that's pretty good. I have never seen any other Evo make 60 extra WHP by just adding a turbo-back and intake. There are guys out there with CPU reflash and full exhuast that barely make 270-280WHP. Hmm.... can just full exhaust and intake make 60WHP?

 

My car made 224 hp and 236 trq on a Mustang dyno with HKS dowpipe, stock cat, and HKS Carbon-Ti cat back.

I don't know what that would equal to on a Dynojet. Someone told me my car should be making about 275 hp and about 280 trq on a Dynojet, but I'm not sure.

Nice #'s though if they are correct.

 

This is flywheel power... not wheel horse power...

 

Agreed! there is no way its 290HP, that equates to like 400BHP which is nonsense looking at the mods.
290BHP and 280/290ft lbs sounds about right for intake and exhaust upgrade.

 

Its wheel hp but since we are at 6000 ft above sea level the corrected numbers are always higher. Over at Mac Autosports the dyno corrects for N/A cars and not turbo. Thats why most of us turbo cars up in Colorado go by the uncorrected numbers.

 

i just like the numbers comparing to some cars in the same area

 

EVO TOY have you burnt a piston yet or is the AFR wrong ?