Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Limited Supply Nonsence

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 12:16 AM
  #31  
BOOYAH1369's Avatar
In Timeout
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
From: CalSLAM STAGE III Sky Londa - 08/02/03
Ralliart is making $$$

Originally posted by shirokuma
The difference between MMC making "consumer" Evolutions and Ralliart making an evolution is akin to the difference between a Ford Mustang and a Saleen Mustang.

I know most of you have not driven a Evo outside of Gran Turismo. But please believe me, there will indeed be a difference between Ralliart and MMC when it comes to this vehicle. Understand this, that the only reason the Evolution was any good in the first place is because of Ralliart being in control of it's creation, not MMC and the employees within.

Cheers,

Paul Hansen
Paul, the only difference I see, is that Ralliart is actually making money on their products! Small operation. Outsource ALL operations to Chinese, Indonesian and Malaysian manufacturers with German companies doing the QA testing.
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 06:44 AM
  #32  
erikgj's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 1
The easy way to see if the Evo VIII is still made by Ralliart Japan is to see how many they make. The record so far is 11,900 in 16 or 18 months for the Evo VII.

The big difference if they are built by MMC will be chassis rigidity. The Evo is much like the type-R with many hand welded braces and extra spot welds. While the 400 or so extra spot welds are disruptive enough on the lancer assembly line. Think about pulling each one off the line and having a highly paid welder jig and hand weld the 37 some odd braces in place.

If you hope that the Evo VIII is more than a Cedia turbo rebadged then it better be built by Ralliart in limited numbers.

Erik
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 06:59 AM
  #33  
RaX's Avatar
RaX
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Originally posted by erikgj
The big difference if they are built by MMC will be chassis rigidity. The Evo is much like the type-R with many hand welded braces and extra spot welds. While the 400 or so extra spot welds are disruptive enough on the lancer assembly line. Think about pulling each one off the line and having a highly paid welder jig and hand weld the 37 some odd braces in place.
Exactly!

I can do without ACD/AYC (though I would like them) but if decides to forego these steps to improve the chassis rigidity on the US Evo, then STi here I come.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 07:55 AM
  #34  
evomk8's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Paul, does Ralliart have its own manufacturing facility where they produce the EVO, or do they use a custom production line at a factory?
As far as I know, factories are highly automated and spot welds could be done by robots. Unless there are other major manufacturing differences, the EVO could conceivably share the line with the Cedia (this may explain the lack of AYC/ACD for the U.S. versions, which seems to be the only major component install difference).
As far as I can tell, as long as Ralliart does the intial R&D, testing and manufacturing development, can manufacture the car according to Ralliart specs. Right?
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 08:03 AM
  #35  
erikgj's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 1
Originally posted by evomk8
Paul, does Ralliart have its own manufacturing facility where they produce the EVO, or do they use a custom production line at a factory?
As far as I know, factories are highly automated and spot welds could be done by robots. Unless there are other major manufacturing differences, the EVO could conceivably share the line with the Cedia (this may explain the lack of AYC/ACD for the U.S. versions, which seems to be the only major component install difference).
As far as I can tell, as long as Ralliart does the intial R&D, testing and manufacturing development, can manufacture the car according to Ralliart specs. Right?
the spots are done by robots on a slowed production line. very disruptive BTW. Then are pulled off and finished up by ralliart. I believe STis have a similar body-in-white production method.

The commom parts on the US lancer and EVO VII are:

Both front doors and the trunk lid.

erik
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 08:12 AM
  #36  
evomk8's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
When you say: "...pulled off and finished up by Ralliart."
Are you saying they are hand-built at a Ralliart facility?
Again, it seems to me that could manufacture the EVO according to Ralliart specs without a loss of quality and reliability.
The EVO is on the same platform as the Cedia and flexible maufacturing could produce both in shifts, theoretically...

Last edited by evomk8; Oct 31, 2002 at 08:17 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 09:53 AM
  #37  
MR.MITSU's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: somewhere in milwaukee

OK, OK everyone You all have valid concerns but they are all null and void one you understand one thing. Ralli///Art is owned I repeat OWNED by MMC ..........so it is more of a question of how many Mitsubishi wishes to produce, small production = mods done after production , larger production - all assembly accomplished on assembly line. Remember this is a WORLD Car now..all will be done via assembly line (JUST LIKE sKUBARU)
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 10:09 AM
  #38  
erikgj's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 1
Originally posted by evomk8
When you say: "...pulled off and finished up by Ralliart."
Are you saying they are hand-built at a Ralliart facility?
Again, it seems to me that could manufacture the EVO according to Ralliart specs without a loss of quality and reliability.
The EVO is on the same platform as the Cedia and flexible maufacturing could produce both in shifts, theoretically...
More like hand modified. Like type-r Integras. Yes, Ralliart is a wholly owned sub of MMC. And no I don't think you can reinforce the chassis like the Evo 7 and make 30-40K a year.

Remember Mitsu USA sells around 300K of all their cars a year in the US. WRXes are built on a line but STis have some hand modifications also work also.

Erik
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 01:15 PM
  #39  
broeli's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,803
Likes: 0
Go to my thread for a good update
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...932#post116932
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 08:26 PM
  #40  
chairezdaniel's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne
So no ralliart contribution what so ever will there be a ralliart evo coming out or is that just another rumor as well?
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 09:32 PM
  #41  
RaX's Avatar
RaX
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Originally posted by chairezdaniel
So no ralliart contribution what so ever
I don't know if I'd say that. I'm sure they've been involved in some way with the R&D of the US Evo. Or maybe thev've done it all and just left the manufacturing to MMC. Whatever the case is, I'm sure Ralliart does NOT want the Evolution name tarnished in any way.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2002 | 08:07 AM
  #42  
evomk8's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally posted by RaX

I don't know if I'd say that. I'm sure they've been involved in some way with the R&D of the US Evo. Or maybe thev've done it all and just left the manufacturing to MMC. Whatever the case is, I'm sure Ralliart does NOT want the Evolution name tarnished in any way.
Neither does
I'm pretty sure that Ralliart still does the R&D, drivetrain/powertrain, and performance tuning.
just needs to manufacture exactly to spec.

erik, do you think producing in shifts(i.e. switching from Cedia to EVO) would still be too disruptive? The Okazaki plant was named most efficient plant in the world 2 years running...
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2002 | 10:14 AM
  #43  
erikgj's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 1
Originally posted by evomk8


Neither does
I'm pretty sure that Ralliart still does the R&D, drivetrain/powertrain, and performance tuning.
just needs to manufacture exactly to spec.

erik, do you think producing in shifts(i.e. switching from Cedia to EVO) would still be too disruptive? The Okazaki plant was named most efficient plant in the world 2 years running...
Yes, since there are not many common parts on the Evo VII and the Cedia. Evo VIII or Evo USDM who knows. Assembly lines are all about synchronization and consistent flow. Slow handwork and assembly lines do not mix well. Evo have been built in the past in very short runs.

It would seem that the handwork that Ralliart did was done offline. It still may be in the MMC plant. When enough bodies were reinforced to schedule a run they complete the entire quantity in a pretty short period of time on the line.

erik
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2002 | 12:26 PM
  #44  
evomk8's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Thanks for your responses Erik.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2002 | 01:28 PM
  #45  
EvoWannabe's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: 2.3l @ 15 psi
Re: Re: GTI 337

Originally posted by EVOL


Did you just you those two words in the same sentence?

What a way to ruin a really nice car.
little slow, I know, but needed to say.....
the tails are not Mr. King of Bling look at me tails. these were the tails that were sold as standard on the anniversary GTI in Europe. the only difference between USA and Euro is the part of the tail light that is smoked. so, no he did not ruin his nice car.
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:48 AM.