Cyber Evo VS. Norris Designs Evo
#16
Originally Posted by talentsearch301
Here's a few vids of the Norris Evo in action (Time attack)
http://www.norrisdesigns.com/videos-evo9.asp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCVJj...at%20knockhill
What do you think?
Cyber Evo or the Norris Design Evo?
My 2 cents... (Im not even close as good as any of these driver... and this is not a bash session)
I think Tarzan and the Cyber Evo has it in the bag...
The Norris Evo is a monster! ...BUT I think Tarzan has become one with the Cyber Evo
Hopefully soon we will see these two go at it!
What do you think?
http://www.norrisdesigns.com/videos-evo9.asp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCVJj...at%20knockhill
What do you think?
Cyber Evo or the Norris Design Evo?
My 2 cents... (Im not even close as good as any of these driver... and this is not a bash session)
I think Tarzan and the Cyber Evo has it in the bag...
The Norris Evo is a monster! ...BUT I think Tarzan has become one with the Cyber Evo
Hopefully soon we will see these two go at it!
What do you think?
#17
Originally Posted by AzBlackEvo8
You must be bored..... lol
My reason for starting this thread is because if you look at it...
there is no real competition for the Cyber Evo, a Japanese team comes to the U.S and cleans up and for the last few years cant be beat
When I lived in Japan most events were also won by all the Japanese Teams... back then you had a few Americans on Japanese Teams, but we werent allowed to go against teamates in public (especially if your car was faster)
But there came a time when they were American teams that started to clean up... but you wont see that in Option videos... you just had to be there... back in the early/ mid 80's
Hopefully since the time attack is fairly ... the reason why we dont see that many contendors is because we are all brushing up on our skills for next year.
Imagine if your team was the one to beat the Cyber Evo team!
The Publicity... major sponsorships... the talk of the town WORLDWIDE
Well I guess I must be a big daydreamer vice someone thats bored!
#21
Originally Posted by Speed Element
this comparison is like comparing apples to oranges.
CyberEVO is designed to kick *** on road course and time attack.
The Norris Design EVO is probably designed to attack 0-400m-0 type of events.
But when comes down to it, i have to give my money to CyberEVO and its crew. No one has better knowledge in terms of tuning and setups than these guys in the world. Period.
CyberEVO is designed to kick *** on road course and time attack.
The Norris Design EVO is probably designed to attack 0-400m-0 type of events.
But when comes down to it, i have to give my money to CyberEVO and its crew. No one has better knowledge in terms of tuning and setups than these guys in the world. Period.
#22
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (270)
Originally Posted by talentsearch301
This is true... BUT there has to be someone in the world (other than in Japan) that is in the lab right now mixing formulas, that's saying " Im going to beat them next year"
Maybe someone from here can step up and organize a "World Series" of Time Attack Events, invite all tuners from all over the Worlds and duke it out? or even better, bring some of our best here to Japan and see how we fare out there?
Last edited by Speed Element; Oct 31, 2006 at 03:39 PM.
#24
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tarzan is pretty amazing. I think he makes a lot of what makes the CyberEvo fast... he can properly tell the engineers what to change and make, to dramatically increase the way the car reacts.
I would LOVE to see a world TT challenge.
I would LOVE to see a world TT challenge.
#25
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: new jersey
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That lap video inside the Norris Evo had a some very costly mistakes in terms of the racing line and shifting. Plus I was reading about it in Import Tuner a while back and the guys at Norris said it was somewhat difficult to manage it at the track, the short wheelbase caused a lot of oversteer.
I think the owner described the ride as scary.
He stated the car transitions from understeer to oversteer extemely quickly.
Stack instrument, sequential shifter, shorten chassis, serious stuff indeed.