Notices
Evo Show / Shine Post your pictures, photoshops, and videos!

Pretty bad ass fq400.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2009, 08:13 AM
  #76  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
streetracerkam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
living room?

Well I'd think that the garage would be better?
But whatever floats your boat.

hahah
Old Dec 6, 2009, 08:41 AM
  #77  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
MrEVO313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by streetracerkam
living room?

Well I'd think that the garage would be better?
But whatever floats your boat.

hahah
lolz i was going to say the same thing...
Old Dec 6, 2009, 10:59 AM
  #78  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
heel2toe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,690
Received 126 Likes on 121 Posts
Originally Posted by Nasty Evolution
That math seems a bit wrong. If a stock 287 hp car puts down 230-240 whp. Wouldn't a 400 hp car put down like 350-360 ish at the wheels?

Crazy cool car but def. not worth the money to me. I would rather pimp out a USDM evo, putting down more hp, 1/100th the lag. Nicer rims, and cheaper insurance!
Not quite. Set up a ratio. 230/287=x/400 That puts it at about 320whp
Old Dec 6, 2009, 11:09 AM
  #79  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (78)
 
RockmanX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 6,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
wow people will pay 80k for 320whp guezz. Crazy.
Old Dec 6, 2009, 11:43 AM
  #80  
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (7)
 
Kevin.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: PHL
Posts: 614
Received 90 Likes on 76 Posts
lol OP = account disabled haha
Old Dec 6, 2009, 12:46 PM
  #81  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Nasty Evolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by heel2toe
Not quite. Set up a ratio. 230/287=x/400 That puts it at about 320whp
I'm not saying that's not right but I don't get that. How is changing the hp going to change how much friction the drivetrain robs from the crank? If you were to change the drivetrain then yes I could see a change in hp loss but if nothing changes why would the ratio change?
Old Dec 6, 2009, 12:51 PM
  #82  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (64)
 
4g63smokinall4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by heel2toe
Not quite. Set up a ratio. 230/287=x/400 That puts it at about 320whp
thats not correct the fq400 had better drivetrain.. stronger clutch.. aka less loss

Originally Posted by Nasty Evolution
I'm not saying that's not right but I don't get that. How is changing the hp going to change how much friction the drivetrain robs from the crank? If you were to change the drivetrain then yes I could see a change in hp loss but if nothing changes why would the ratio change?
They dont have the same drivetrain as the esdm evos.. so the equation is not correct.. we have less aggressive components
Old Dec 6, 2009, 01:20 PM
  #83  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
garcias2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CO Springs
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by streetracerkam
living room?

Well I'd think that the garage would be better?
But whatever floats your boat.

hahah
I was being sarcastic.
Old Dec 6, 2009, 07:17 PM
  #84  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
heel2toe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,690
Received 126 Likes on 121 Posts
Originally Posted by Nasty Evolution
I'm not saying that's not right but I don't get that. How is changing the hp going to change how much friction the drivetrain robs from the crank? If you were to change the drivetrain then yes I could see a change in hp loss but if nothing changes why would the ratio change?
I never said adding power is going to change the ratio. Both wheel horsepower values are about 80 percent of the crank horsepower

Originally Posted by 4g63smokinall4s
thats not correct the fq400 had better drivetrain.. stronger clutch.. aka less loss
The ratio was set up for sake of discussion. It is obviously not an exact science. Every car is going to have a different drivetrain loss. And you have got to be kidding me about the different clutch...its not really going to skew the results. Will it have an effect? Sure...but nothing substantial. Just my .02
Old Dec 7, 2009, 06:32 PM
  #85  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (78)
 
RockmanX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 6,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
still not worth 80k for that. at the time it was the big dawg heck i like the new fq400 evo X i wonder how much that one is never did get a price on it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
less10
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
33
Dec 14, 2010 12:44 PM
less10
For Sale - Part Outs
90
Sep 5, 2009 10:13 PM
Honto
For Sale - Wheels / Tires
8
Feb 16, 2008 04:24 AM
dave12285
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
22
Dec 20, 2006 02:35 PM



Quick Reply: Pretty bad ass fq400.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:10 PM.