Notices
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension Discuss everything that helps make your car start and stop to the best of it's abilities.

Gunmetal LE28N

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 28, 2003 | 09:56 PM
  #1  
jwtodd60's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 391
Likes: 1
From: Virginia
Gunmetal LE28N

Sorry for the dirty car, but it's rained here for like the last nine days straight or something like that. Anyway, the wheels are Volk Racing LE28N (aka CE28N-L) 17x8, +33mm. The tires are Kumho Ecsta V700 235/40-17. If I get some time and the weather cooperates, I may post some better pix later. These will have to do for now...

JW
Attached Thumbnails Gunmetal LE28N-le28n_profile1.jpg  
Reply
Old May 28, 2003 | 10:00 PM
  #2  
jwtodd60's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 391
Likes: 1
From: Virginia
close up...
Attached Thumbnails Gunmetal LE28N-le28n_closeup1.jpg  
Reply
Old May 28, 2003 | 10:05 PM
  #3  
2Cool's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, FL
Love the gunmetal, and hope you aren't driving around on those V700s... they'll kill ya in the rain.
Reply
Old May 28, 2003 | 10:26 PM
  #4  
jwtodd60's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 391
Likes: 1
From: Virginia
No problem with the V700s in the rain...I'm just using them for autocrossing. That's not to say it won't rain then, but...

I also forgot to mention that the OEM 21mm lug nuts don't work on this wheel. 19mm ones with a more cone like face to them were provided and work fine. I only mention it because if you will be swapping them frequently for autocrosses or whatever, it could become a bit of a PITA. Nothing major, but it is something to consider...

JW
Reply
Old May 28, 2003 | 10:30 PM
  #5  
evofan@scorp's's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Victorville, CA
Looks nice, but why didn't you get 18's? They look 120% better.
Reply
Old May 28, 2003 | 11:49 PM
  #6  
Diesel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
From: PA
looks nice man...
Reply
Old May 29, 2003 | 12:11 AM
  #7  
gtr's Avatar
gtr
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,452
Likes: 1
Originally posted by evofan@scorp's
Looks nice, but why didn't you get 18's? They look 120% better.
Smaller and ligher are better performing if the brake fit of course.

I mean he said stock advan tires.

Last edited by gtr; May 29, 2003 at 12:18 AM.
Reply
Old May 29, 2003 | 12:26 AM
  #8  
iodine23's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Did you go for 235/40 instead of 245/45 to save tire weight or to keep the same section width of the tire (or both)?
Reply
Old May 29, 2003 | 11:59 AM
  #9  
jotan82's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
shoulda went 17x9.5 at least...

they look good though, a bit small, but nice for auto-x'in
Reply
Old May 29, 2003 | 12:03 PM
  #10  
2Cool's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, FL
I ordered a set of Victoracer 255/40s to go on my stock rims, and am swapping the stock tires over to the RPM2s next week. I wanted the widest sticky tire possible for auto-x use. Winning by a half second isn't as comfortable as widening it to a 1-1.5 range, going from stock to race tires.
Reply
Old May 29, 2003 | 01:50 PM
  #11  
iodine23's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
2Cool: I guess there's enough clearance for the 255's without any rubbing then? Let me know if you have any problems. I was thinking of going up to 245's when I get new tires, but may get 255's if they'll fit.

Any reason why you're putting the race tires on the stock rims and not the new ones? Aren't the RPM2's lighter than the stockers by a few pounds?
Reply
Old May 29, 2003 | 02:43 PM
  #12  
jwtodd60's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 391
Likes: 1
From: Virginia
For those who think I should have gone larger, the reason I went for 17x8 is that is the only size that is legal in Solo 2 A Stock (autocross), which is what I bought them for.

My decision to go with 235/40-17 Ecsta V700s was a bit less straightforward, but here we go:

- Much cheaper than Hoosiers. If the competition gets too close, maybe I'll pop for a set of those when I wear these out.

- Lighter & softer than the Victoracer. Having said that, an awful lot of lead got put on my wheels to balance them out with the Ecstas mounted. Must be lopsided tires

- Supposedly puts more rubber on the ground for a given size than the Victoracer. Don't totally understand that, but that's what I hear. Something to do with having squarer shoulders or something like that.

- About an inch shorter than stock size, giving me better gearing, so long as it doesn't force me into third gear too often.

- Not sure how big I could go. Going by the mfrs specs, the biggest I could go with a 17x8 was 245mm. I know people don't always pay attention to those numbers, but I figure I'll let someone else blaze that trail. The same goes for what will fit in our wheel wells without rubbing.

That's the beauty/horror of race tires...you go through them quickly enough that you can always try something different later if you don't like what you picked this time 'round...

JW
Reply
Old May 29, 2003 | 06:00 PM
  #13  
2Cool's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, FL
I'll post if there is any interference issue with the 255s. And yep, racing tires seem to be less balanced than Z speed rated street tires. Try some drag radials or slicks, they are often way beyond unbalanced... worst I saw was 16 ounces (1 pound) of lead on some 30" slicks...

I wanted something a bit different for my daily use rims, and the stock ones weigh pretty much the same as the RPM2s. Later I will likely swap back when I get bored... heh
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 12:15 AM
  #14  
DA-Evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
nice
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 12:28 PM
  #15  
johnr265's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Those are very sweet looking rims. Three questions for you.
1) were those more expensive than the ce-28n (without the polished lip) and if so, how much more.
2) Could you feel any difference in the lighter weight (better acceleration, better handling over bumps, etc...). Seems that with about 7-8 lbs less per wheel of unsprung weight, you might be able to feel it.
3) With lighter weight rims, is it easier to spin the tires from a standstill (ie- would you still have to drop the clutch from 5000 rpm to get some wheelspin).

Thanks in advance.

Last edited by johnr265; Jun 1, 2003 at 12:34 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:27 AM.