Notices
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension Discuss everything that helps make your car start and stop to the best of it's abilities.

Rota Grid Fitment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 05:16 PM
  #1  
llvllattp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: socal
Rota Grid Fitment

the wheels im looking forward in buying are rota grids 18x9.5 +20

now from what i heard u dont need a spacer and OF COURSE u need fender rolling...

heres a picture of a perfect example of the same wheels

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ve...tto-nt05s.html

now my concern was that since i am only dropped on springs i dont have the availabilty to run negative camber, is negative camber needed?

and the size tire i have is 255

can you run these with springs? i have H & R Springs

thank you guys! inputs would be nice and generous!

-Matt
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #2  
chu's Avatar
chu
Evolved Member
iTrader: (72)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,831
Likes: 2
From: Philadelphia
You should be fine. Evos have the ability to run -2 degrees in the front in stock form by flipping the essentric bolts in the front. I recommend getting an alignment for -1.5 to -2 in front, and -1 to -1.5 in the rears, zero out the toe. It should help the fitment to be more flush, and aid in handling.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #3  
llvllattp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: socal
thank you so much chu

anymore inputs?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 09:23 PM
  #4  
03Evo8DTC's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Kent
Shouldnt have any problems, ive ran -2 all the way around with no problem on the track.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 09:45 PM
  #5  
Kapoosh1's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Don't need spacers and definately need fender rolling. And NEED negative camber.....
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 08:38 PM
  #6  
03Evo8DTC's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Kent
depends on how much your lowered to determine camber, deff need fender rolling though
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 10:22 PM
  #7  
8UpUrV8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Houston
There was recently a thread on this... no issues on stock suspension, rolling in rear required.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 10:51 PM
  #8  
03Evo8DTC's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Kent
yes but on a lowered suspension from 1.5-2.3 you would need up to -3.4 chamber and serious fender rolling
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 10:58 PM
  #9  
climb_on's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
figured i would add a little more to the topic in case some is searching for this later on...

with a 18x9.5 wheel with offset in the low +20's like the rota grid seems like the common tire width is 255 now what about profile?? some are running 40 while other 35. many companies dont offer a 255/35r18 i personaly would prefer running a 255/40r18 tough, so whats the clearance issues with the slightly taller tire.

the fortune auto rs seems to be happy running his 40 series and it looks great might i add!
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 11:07 PM
  #10  
03Evo8DTC's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Kent
the 255-35-18 is offered and with the "profile" aka aspect ratio you dont need to roll fenders on a 18x9.5 wheel if slightly lowered. the 40 series is a bit tall IMO but can be done. The 35 series gives you a more aggressive look and gives you options such as the potenza and advan setup for tires. getting aggressive you can run a 275-35-18
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #11  
climb_on's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
I just prefer the look of a meatier tire. The stock aspect ratio is 45 I would think that a 40 ratio for an 18 would be ideal not look tall. If anything a 35 would look short requiring a bigger drop to take up the wheel gap

Last edited by climb_on; Nov 22, 2009 at 12:07 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 02:58 PM
  #12  
03Evo8DTC's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Kent
depends on the size of the tire, the 255-35 looks like the 235 40 depending on what tire
the 275-35 looks very close to the 235-45
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 06:39 PM
  #13  
climb_on's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
i guess it really comes downt to tire brand also,
i was just confused by what you meant by the 35 looking more aggressive? its a smaller tire, i just didnt want to have the car too low in order to get rid of the wheel gap.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 09:32 PM
  #14  
03Evo8DTC's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Kent
agreed, ive played with alot of sizes working for a tire retailer, and the 255-35 in a few tires fit the gap nicely
the 275's fill it very nicely and fit near perfect
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 09:46 PM
  #15  
climb_on's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
ya 275's are great but with a +20 offset wouldnt work out on a non widend evo.
even with major fender rolling
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:37 AM.