18's? not good for handling...
18's? not good for handling...
"18s suck for ride quality and/or handling. 19s are worse than 18s.
John Mueller "
This has been going around on the DSM group emails. John is the suspension expert at Road Race engineering that does incredible **** with the uncomfortable JIC FLT's and some how makes them corner 10X's better with a softer spring rate.
Those that know know what i'm talking about.
I thought id post this to stir up some conversation amongst you all, particularly those that don't think 18's would hurt performance.
I neither endorse, nor reject this view, although i will say that given John's expertise, and the results i have seen with the JIC's hes tuned for me, i would err on the side of listening to his opinion.
But...as always, argue away.
John Mueller "
This has been going around on the DSM group emails. John is the suspension expert at Road Race engineering that does incredible **** with the uncomfortable JIC FLT's and some how makes them corner 10X's better with a softer spring rate.
Those that know know what i'm talking about.
I thought id post this to stir up some conversation amongst you all, particularly those that don't think 18's would hurt performance.
I neither endorse, nor reject this view, although i will say that given John's expertise, and the results i have seen with the JIC's hes tuned for me, i would err on the side of listening to his opinion.
But...as always, argue away.
Originally posted by mprtklr
i think the HKS EVO added 18's and the g went to like .98 from the stock 17's at like .95 something like that, if anyone else knows the exacts....
i think the HKS EVO added 18's and the g went to like .98 from the stock 17's at like .95 something like that, if anyone else knows the exacts....
Right. But that doesn't mean anything at the point where the 18's weren't the ONLY thing that HKS added.
The coilovers they added may have provided handling improvement to offset the loss of performance from 18's, but that doesn't mean that the same coilover setup with 17's wouldn't have been better
Re: 18's? not good for handling...
Originally posted by alex_alex
"18s suck for ride quality and/or handling. 19s are worse than 18s.
John Mueller "
This has been going around on the DSM group emails. John is the suspension expert at Road Race engineering that does incredible **** with the uncomfortable JIC FLT's and some how makes them corner 10X's better with a softer spring rate.
Those that know know what i'm talking about.
I thought id post this to stir up some conversation amongst you all, particularly those that don't think 18's would hurt performance.
I neither endorse, nor reject this view, although i will say that given John's expertise, and the results i have seen with the JIC's hes tuned for me, i would err on the side of listening to his opinion.
But...as always, argue away.
"18s suck for ride quality and/or handling. 19s are worse than 18s.
John Mueller "
This has been going around on the DSM group emails. John is the suspension expert at Road Race engineering that does incredible **** with the uncomfortable JIC FLT's and some how makes them corner 10X's better with a softer spring rate.
Those that know know what i'm talking about.
I thought id post this to stir up some conversation amongst you all, particularly those that don't think 18's would hurt performance.
I neither endorse, nor reject this view, although i will say that given John's expertise, and the results i have seen with the JIC's hes tuned for me, i would err on the side of listening to his opinion.
But...as always, argue away.
Since you have the RRE setup, what is the street ride comfort like? Is it much harder than stock? I'm thinking about this setup but I don't want a killer stiff street ride. I stayed with 17" wheels to keep down the weight as well as for handling. Thanks in advance.
Originally posted by mprtklr
i think the HKS EVO added 18's and the g went to like .98 from the stock 17's at like .95 something like that, if anyone else knows the exacts....
i think the HKS EVO added 18's and the g went to like .98 from the stock 17's at like .95 something like that, if anyone else knows the exacts....
Re: Re: 18's? not good for handling...
Originally posted by Bluesmaster
So Alex,
Since you have the RRE setup, what is the street ride comfort like? Is it much harder than stock? I'm thinking about this setup but I don't want a killer stiff street ride. I stayed with 17" wheels to keep down the weight as well as for handling. Thanks in advance.
So Alex,
Since you have the RRE setup, what is the street ride comfort like? Is it much harder than stock? I'm thinking about this setup but I don't want a killer stiff street ride. I stayed with 17" wheels to keep down the weight as well as for handling. Thanks in advance.
Trending Topics
Re: 18's? not good for handling...
Originally posted by alex_alex
"18s suck for ride quality and/or handling. 19s are worse than 18s.
John Mueller "
"18s suck for ride quality and/or handling. 19s are worse than 18s.
John Mueller "
Re: Re: 18's? not good for handling...
Originally posted by Neal@tirerack.
Whats his reason for saying this? There are pros and cons, but what are they in his opinion? Without reason it just sounds like one persons view
Whats his reason for saying this? There are pros and cons, but what are they in his opinion? Without reason it just sounds like one persons view
But as far as specific reasons, i have yet to really ask. His opinion is primarily formed from experience, road race is always testing out different setups on the track.
I've read in several places that 18" wheels/tires offer the optimal combination of grip, ride, sidewall flex, and heat management. If I am not mistaken, all of the WRC teams use 18" wheels in tarmac events, most DTM and FIA touring cars use 18" wheels, and ALMS prototypes use (like the Audi R8) use 18" wheels. The only reason F1 does not is because of regulations. I will check today to find the references...
Originally posted by Chris in HB
I've read in several places that 18" wheels/tires offer the optimal combination of grip, ride, sidewall flex, and heat management. If I am not mistaken, all of the WRC teams use 18" wheels in tarmac events, most DTM and FIA touring cars use 18" wheels, and ALMS prototypes use (like the Audi R8) use 18" wheels. The only reason F1 does not is because of regulations. I will check today to find the references...
I've read in several places that 18" wheels/tires offer the optimal combination of grip, ride, sidewall flex, and heat management. If I am not mistaken, all of the WRC teams use 18" wheels in tarmac events, most DTM and FIA touring cars use 18" wheels, and ALMS prototypes use (like the Audi R8) use 18" wheels. The only reason F1 does not is because of regulations. I will check today to find the references...
Re: Re: Re: 18's? not good for handling...
Originally posted by alex_alex
The ride is not THAT much harsher, but it is noticeable. But let me tell you, i use this car as a daily driver and i never regret getting the coils. It corners insanely.
The ride is not THAT much harsher, but it is noticeable. But let me tell you, i use this car as a daily driver and i never regret getting the coils. It corners insanely.
I always thought that if you want the best combination of ride and handling the 17" rim lets you get away with a little more sidewall with out affecting your overall gear ratio as witha 18 tire. I think the best combo will be a 245-40-17 on the stock wheels or A lighter 17x8 rim with a good coilover system tuned correctly and a rear tower brace and a larger rear adjustable sway bar.
just my 2 cts
just my 2 cts




