Notices
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension Discuss everything that helps make your car start and stop to the best of it's abilities.

Camber Plates vs. Camber Bolts...needed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2012, 08:10 PM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
GTijoejoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,110
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Camber Plates vs. Camber Bolts...needed?

I tried searching but didn't really find what I was looking for.

A) when lowering a car from factory height, how much camber is adjustable from the stock mounting hardware?
I'm looking to run -2.0 FR and some where -1.5-1.8 RR camber

B) What are the benefits of camber plates? con's?
Increased adjustability, caster changes (on some), alter's suspension geometry as it changes the damper point? (scrub radius)

C) What are the benefits of camber bolts? con's? Cost?

I'm trying to understand what I should be looking for to setup my suspension properly, would like to understand cost vs. merit. My vehicle is primarily street driven, occasional auto-x and track maybe. Perhaps I don't need camber plates, but perhaps I don't need camber bolts either...

Sorry if this info is out there, I really did try searching..Thanks
Old Feb 16, 2012, 05:38 AM
  #2  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (35)
 
GTWORX.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbia, Maryland
Posts: 3,583
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
You can get around -2 up front (usually just under) with the OEM front bolts. -1.5 in the rear is good.

The OEM bolts are 2 position adjustable....-1 and -2. Stock is -1. -2 is mo' better.

I'd recommend camber plates if you plan on running any more than that. Some do add caster which is nice, and the solid mount also helps a little (at the expense of a little ride quality).

If you don't track or auto-x extensively then I'd probably skip the plates.

EDIT: the main questions are what is your current set-up and what are your goals?

- Andrew

Last edited by GTWORX.com; Feb 16, 2012 at 05:43 AM.
Old Feb 16, 2012, 05:47 AM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
TommiM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,205
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
With camber bolts you can actually change your scrub radius ( the center line from the strut top to the center of the wheel) vs the camber plates which dont. Might be or not worth it depending on what offset wheels you have and driving style. Im not sure if the stock bolts allow for that much difference but I do recall their being aftermarket camber bolt kits that give greater camber adjustment, although I hear the bolts are not as stout as the oem ones.
Old Feb 16, 2012, 05:49 AM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Smike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: somewhere testing various tires, brakes, and suspensions.
Posts: 9,002
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
With Andrew.

I AX'd and tracked my 8 heavily without plates. If I was using that car for w2w or TT...I'd have a different suspension and plates. For DD-AX (competitive)-HPDE...OE camber bolts work.
Old Feb 16, 2012, 06:05 AM
  #5  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (35)
 
GTWORX.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbia, Maryland
Posts: 3,583
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Indeed. A large part of it will come down to tires. Tracking the car on r-comps? Get plates for sure. If not, you may not really need to. Being able to get decent camber out of an EVO with just stock bolts is a pretty big plus.

- drew
Old Feb 16, 2012, 09:52 AM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
TommiM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,205
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by GTWORX.com
Tracking the car on r-comps? Get plates for sure.

- drew
Curious as to why? Is it because generally more camber is better with r comps or because of the stiffer mounts vs oem tops?
Old Feb 16, 2012, 10:11 AM
  #7  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (35)
 
GTWORX.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbia, Maryland
Posts: 3,583
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
More grip = more roll, more camber needed and yes also the stiffer mounts is a big difference vs. the rubber top mounts when you have that much cornering force.

Also, r-comps are just a measure of someone's commitment I guess to tracking their car.

- andrew
Old Feb 16, 2012, 01:24 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
GTijoejoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,110
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
The suspension I'm running now is stock CTA9 MR.
My goal is to improve handling and keep some daily drivability while making the stance aggressive. I'm running 18x9.5 et20 w/ yokahama S-drive 255/18/35.... I would like to set the wheel gap aggressive enough and not rub like a ****. So having adjustible ride height is important to me, which is one reason why I'm steering away from a conventional damper/spring setup.

My plan is to run H&R coilovers, I've ran these on a handful of other vehicles (subaru, vw, audi), and my current DD runs these, so I'm fairly happy with them. My main focus is understanding what suspension adjustment I should be expecting and how to correct it with stock harndware, camber bolts, or camber plates.

It seems plates are unnecessary for my goals, camber bolts would be a safe bet, I would hate to get an alignment and find out the stock hardware wouldn't cut it in the FR and all they could get was -1.7 instead of -2.0, or worse.

Thanks for the input guys.
Old Feb 16, 2012, 07:14 PM
  #9  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (35)
 
GTWORX.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbia, Maryland
Posts: 3,583
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
I don't know if I'd bother with aftermarket bolts...you should be able to get very close to -2 with the OEM bolts.

- Andrew
Old Feb 17, 2012, 04:12 AM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Smike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: somewhere testing various tires, brakes, and suspensions.
Posts: 9,002
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by GTijoejoe
The suspension I'm running now is stock CTA9 MR.
My goal is to improve handling and keep some daily drivability while making the stance aggressive. I'm running 18x9.5 et20 w/ yokahama S-drive 255/18/35.... I would like to set the wheel gap aggressive enough and not rub like a ****. So having adjustible ride height is important to me, which is one reason why I'm steering away from a conventional damper/spring setup.

My plan is to run H&R coilovers, I've ran these on a handful of other vehicles (subaru, vw, audi), and my current DD runs these, so I'm fairly happy with them. My main focus is understanding what suspension adjustment I should be expecting and how to correct it with stock harndware, camber bolts, or camber plates.

It seems plates are unnecessary for my goals, camber bolts would be a safe bet, I would hate to get an alignment and find out the stock hardware wouldn't cut it in the FR and all they could get was -1.7 instead of -2.0, or worse.

Thanks for the input guys.
/sigh...stance.

H&Rs (have them on my race Focus) are very nice. However, for the Evo they have the rates biased for understeer (high front rate and lower rear rate). Bilstein PSS9 is very very similar to the H&Rs but better spring rate selection. Another set I would for sure look at for the price range and performance are the GTWorx KW3s.

And from personal experience, -1.7 = -2.0. There are ranges that you just wont feel much difference. Like NASCAR "turns" when they come in for a pit adjustment. 0.5 is where I start to feel differences in camber to response.
Old Feb 17, 2012, 05:24 AM
  #11  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
GTijoejoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,110
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by GTWORX.com
I don't know if I'd bother with aftermarket bolts...you should be able to get very close to -2 with the OEM bolts.

- Andrew
Thanks for the input


Smike don't sigh, whats the point of an aggressive performace setup if you don't use it? If I want a racecar, I'll build a racecar.... where I work there are tons of ppl who have racecars as well as multiple racing teams, there's gobbs of knowledge and experience but every vehicle may have its place and goals and racing does not fit this vehicles purpose in my life.

Thanks, I'll look into PPS9's
Old Feb 17, 2012, 05:49 AM
  #12  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Smike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: somewhere testing various tires, brakes, and suspensions.
Posts: 9,002
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Just the word stance means more of "its how I look standing next to my car" more than how the car performs.
Old Feb 17, 2012, 08:25 AM
  #13  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
GTijoejoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,110
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Smike
Just the word stance means more of "its how I look standing next to my car" more than how the car performs.
HAHAHA, but its not how you stand next to your car, its how you drive your car, inch or a mile winnings winning.

I understand, at least I didn't say I want to drop it on bags and stretch 205 tires on 11" wide wheels with -30.0 camber
Old Feb 17, 2012, 08:38 AM
  #14  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
PearceEVOix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Boulder, Co
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GTijoejoe
HAHAHA, but its not how you stand next to your car, its how you drive your car, inch or a mile winnings winning.

I understand, at least I didn't say I want to drop it on bags and stretch 205 tires on 11" wide wheels with -30.0 camber
STANCE FOR THE WIN!
Old Feb 17, 2012, 11:36 AM
  #15  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
GTijoejoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,110
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by PearceEVOix
STANCE FOR THE WIN!
Wow, your contribution is amazing

Smike pm'd


Quick Reply: Camber Plates vs. Camber Bolts...needed?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:06 PM.