Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

AMS's USCC winning EVO X on a Prototype 30R kit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 06:39 PM
  #16  
STi2EvoX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 1
From: USA
Originally Posted by spdracerut
The test was done at Cal Speedway/Fontana/Autoclub Speedway; it's notorious for being slow. Not to mention, it was in the middle of August with temps most likely hovering above 100F. I don't have the article in front of me, but I think the only car that trapped faster in the USCC competition was the Evo VIII. I want to say the modded GTR only trapped 116, I could be wrong though... someone look it up!
Well, the 1/4 mile times and trap speeds don't accurately represent how fast the X really is in real world scenarios because the gearing is terrible for the strip; you have to shift into 5th gear right before the 1/4 mile mark and that kills the times. In the road racing or on the street this is inconsequential, though.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 08:26 PM
  #17  
BigT's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 2
From: NW NJ
Originally Posted by STi2EvoX
Well, the 1/4 mile times and trap speeds don't accurately represent how fast the X really is in real world scenarios because the gearing is terrible for the strip; you have to shift into 5th gear right before the 1/4 mile mark and that kills the times. In the road racing or on the street this is inconsequential, though.
Shifting into fifth would probably kill ET. Its the low mph for whp that i'm questioning. Trap speed tells all about whp and i'm sure Eric drove the **** out of it.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 09:04 PM
  #18  
EricJ@AMS's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 1
From: Wood Dale, IL
You have it the other way around. You can let off the gas in the last 100 ft and it wont affect the E.T. as much as it will the mph.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 09:55 PM
  #19  
Fourdoor's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
Originally Posted by Chris@AMS
The fuel was MS109 if memory serves correctly



It was actually at the k&n dyno facilities.
I thought they only allowed pump gas in the ultimate street car challenge? Have they changed the rules or am I just mistaken on this?

Keith
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 09:11 AM
  #20  
BigT's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 2
From: NW NJ
Originally Posted by EricJ@AMS
You have it the other way around. You can let off the gas in the last 100 ft and it wont affect the E.T. as much as it will the mph.

I guess. Traveling at such speed, i'm sure you didn't lose much. The ET on your run was great, its just the low trap speed that doesn't reflect 490whp one bit even with the fifth gear shift.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 05:38 PM
  #21  
EricJ@AMS's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 1
From: Wood Dale, IL
This test was done at the end of the shutdown area running uphill to the finish line, which would affect mph. It was also done with some sort of radar gun, so its accuracy is always an issue.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 08:02 PM
  #22  
BigT's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 2
From: NW NJ
Originally Posted by EricJ@AMS
This test was done at the end of the shutdown area running uphill to the finish line, which would affect mph. It was also done with some sort of radar gun, so its accuracy is always an issue.
That certainly makes a lot of sense.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 10:10 PM
  #23  
Viciouz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,830
Likes: 0
From: Southern Cali
Price? Kit options?

I am seriously holding out to get one of these and want to plan my future mods accordingly.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 03:57 PM
  #24  
BigT's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 2
From: NW NJ
I'm still wondering why you guys are using an MBC when you tune with ecutek. Better boost control maybe?
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 04:52 PM
  #25  
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by Viciouz
Price? Kit options?

I am seriously holding out to get one of these and want to plan my future mods accordingly.
Nothing just yet. We hope to have the kit launched just after the new year. We do plan on offering the GT3076R, GT35R and AMS GT850R.

Eric
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 05:14 PM
  #26  
triguy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Didn't the AMS Evo also have the fastest lap time on the Streets of Willow Springs in the Sport Compact challenge? A time of around 1:24?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:23 AM
  #27  
sylnraul_evox's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Correct me if I'm wrong but , I believe they had the second fastest. Fastest one was the 350z i thought. Probably because it had much more suspension work done to it...
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 07:22 AM
  #28  
Chris@AMS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: West Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by BigT
I'm still wondering why you guys are using an MBC when you tune with ecutek. Better boost control maybe?
The stock solenoids can't achieve the level of boost that we are trying to run. 26-29 psi.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 09:33 AM
  #29  
salagahle2000's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: The End of the Yellow Brick Road
AMS does some incredible stuff with these 4cyl cars
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #30  
NateDaJew's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: PHILLY
Man I cant decide on a turbo upgrade. Now I have to wait for this to come out. Great work!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:06 AM.