X with BR Intake, Cat Back and Ecutek
Freshly Tuned = 333hp
It was a long drive yesterday but well worth it.
I went to ics performance in Conn. and had a tune by Al from Dynoflash.
We made 341tq and 333 hp.
Buschur cat back, intake, upper and lower i/c pipes.
The printer was broken so all I could get was a pic of the screen.
Marcus
I went to ics performance in Conn. and had a tune by Al from Dynoflash.
We made 341tq and 333 hp.
Buschur cat back, intake, upper and lower i/c pipes.
The printer was broken so all I could get was a pic of the screen.
Marcus
X with BR Intake, Cat Back and Ecutek
This was a very simply equiped X with minimal mods which ran really smooth and crsip
Bushcur Intake and Carbon Shield
Buschur Cat Back
Buschur Upper and lower fmic
Forge UNOS MBC at 26 psi peak 93 octane
Ecutek tune by Dyno Flash
341 TQ and 333 whp uncorrected

There is some short footage of the X contained within this video which is actually a true life comedy bit about our carpenter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzwgvAl-4Rg
Bushcur Intake and Carbon Shield
Buschur Cat Back
Buschur Upper and lower fmic
Forge UNOS MBC at 26 psi peak 93 octane
Ecutek tune by Dyno Flash
341 TQ and 333 whp uncorrected

There is some short footage of the X contained within this video which is actually a true life comedy bit about our carpenter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzwgvAl-4Rg
Last edited by DynoFlash; Apr 19, 2009 at 03:28 PM.
Trending Topics
Why do you guys use MBC's when the stock boost control on the Evo X has proven to be more than adequate? We all know it's leagues above the boost control previously present on Evos.
Just wondering the motivation behind the use of MBC's when you also use ECU-based tuning.
Just wondering the motivation behind the use of MBC's when you also use ECU-based tuning.



