Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

my evo x dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 07:19 AM
  #1  
solarevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: orlando
my evo x dyno results

Well I finally pony up and had the car tuned on Saturday and had some great results
The only 4 modifications done are
Invidia full TBE
AEM cold air intake
Nessis 1 piece upper pipe
TTP Re-flash

Total investment in aftermarket $1,400

The car put down 367 WHP and 332 torque @ 25-26 psi with drive line loss @ roughly 16% 425 hp and 385 torque

Pretty impressive over the 291 hp stock of 134 hp increase

I would like to thank TTP for taking time out on their Saturday for the tune,
Attached Thumbnails my evo x dyno results-sterman_before_after.jpg   my evo x dyno results-evo-dyno.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 04:43 PM
  #2  
jrsimon27's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 6
From: C.A Honduras!
what octane did the tank of gas had?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 05:21 PM
  #3  
monkey_187's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
From: Unknown
Impressive!

Your car is the first orange X I seen, looks good with the aero kit!
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 05:32 PM
  #4  
ganghyung's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Wow great number with only those mods.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 08:09 PM
  #5  
supergengo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, CA
Originally Posted by monkey_187
Impressive!

Your car is the first orange X I seen, looks good with the aero kit!

Pretty sure that is RR, not orange.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 08:23 PM
  #6  
Clipse3GT's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,185
Likes: 2
From: Cleveland, OH
Sea Level hp is slightly higher than higher elevations. Excellent numbers nonetheless.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 09:34 PM
  #7  
dcpatters's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Damn, from 4400 RPM on, the motor keeps pulling.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2009 | 05:56 AM
  #8  
atombomb33's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 2
From: Redondo Beach, CA
As far as the gains are concerned, this is right in line with what other tuners are producing. Looks good. I'm assuming the huge spike on the baseline run was due to the AEM intake???
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2009 | 06:26 AM
  #9  
solarevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: orlando
yes atom there was a spike he had issues with, but the tune was around 25-26 psi

jrs just pump gas, nothing special

i will have the video posted up soon

Last edited by solarevo; Nov 23, 2009 at 06:17 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2009 | 06:17 AM
  #10  
solarevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: orlando
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qrb5f5rQXyI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhxEs_Igdzs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsuvPwzJD5M
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2009 | 07:28 AM
  #11  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
So, baseline was 325whp yet the car is rated at 291bhp stock...might wanna re-do your math for your final crank numbers No offense but while it is a great tuning tool, TTP's dyno tends to read a bit high. Good solid numbers though I bet the car fun!
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2009 | 07:41 AM
  #12  
solarevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: orlando
Originally Posted by scheides
So, baseline was 325whp yet the car is rated at 291bhp stock...might wanna re-do your math for your final crank numbers No offense but while it is a great tuning tool, TTP's dyno tends to read a bit high. Good solid numbers though I bet the car fun!

thanks for the unnecessary criticism the car did not arrive stock to ttp, it had all the mods already on it, and it was already reading 25 psi from the AEM intake set up,

average drive line loss is 16% i am assuming it could be more or less
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2009 | 08:46 AM
  #13  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
16% drivetrain loss for AWD is way low. I think most people assume 22-25%.

Even in my old RSX people never assume less than 18% or so and that is FWD.

However, nice setup, congrats on the numbers.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2009 | 09:43 AM
  #14  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Originally Posted by solarevo
thanks for the unnecessary criticism the car did not arrive stock to ttp, it had all the mods already on it, and it was already reading 25 psi from the AEM intake set up,

average drive line loss is 16% i am assuming it could be more or less
Drivetrain loss to mustang numbers should be more like 25-30%, that's all I'm saying. Your car makes good power and if you're happy with it that's all that matters.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2009 | 09:45 AM
  #15  
tipoytm's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: CA
Still, he gained 42whp over baseline... nice numbers, gratz!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:40 AM.