Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

2010 Evo GSR - Simple Bolt ons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 3, 2010, 04:29 PM
  #1  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 Evo GSR - Simple Bolt ons

Another new 2010 Evo GSR came through the shop the other day.

2010 Evo GSR

Mods

Gruppe-M Intake
ETS 3.5" FMIC
ETS UICP/LICP
ETS 02 Eliminator downpipe
AMS HFC
Agency Power catback
GST Boost Pill @ 24.5 psi peak
GST custom dyno tuning using EcuFlash
91 octane

308 whp / 306 wtq

Dotted lines are stock tune with mods. Solid is with custom tuning and boost pill.

Great power for simple bolt on parts!



For reference on our dyno:

Stock 03/04 evo = 190-210whp

Stock 05 evo = 210-215whp

Stock 06 evo = 220-230whp

Stock 08 evo = 215-230whp

Stock 09 Ralliart = 190-199whp
Old Feb 3, 2010, 10:15 PM
  #2  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Norcal
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe I'm missing something, but this car with all of it's bolt-on parts isnt making much more power than the GSR in the thread below this one with just a magnaflow catback and AEM intake. Does this mean I just wasted a bunch of money bolting parts onto my car?
Old Feb 3, 2010, 11:20 PM
  #3  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by orthojoe
Maybe I'm missing something, but this car with all of it's bolt-on parts isnt making much more power than the GSR in the thread below this one with just a magnaflow catback and AEM intake. Does this mean I just wasted a bunch of money bolting parts onto my car?
FMIC, LICP, UICP, Intake are all good supporting mods for more airflow which isn't fully realized until a larger turbo is in the mix.

HFC also limits the flow potential.

- Bryan
Old Feb 3, 2010, 11:29 PM
  #4  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
HR2L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
he pulls out the HFC, and probably pics up another 7-10whp and a bit more TQ.
Old Feb 4, 2010, 10:24 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
LVSBB6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CAN
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good gains! nice to see Gruppe M intake in the menu
Old Feb 4, 2010, 10:26 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
whoang40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's a lot of area under the torque curve, great gains.
Old Feb 5, 2010, 12:21 PM
  #7  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
H Jensen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NorCal, Nevada, Military locations
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks all, it does feel diffrent driving than before. And the Gruppe-M was ****.

Last edited by H Jensen; Feb 5, 2010 at 07:31 PM.
Old Feb 5, 2010, 06:53 PM
  #8  
Newbie
 
crimson49er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
good news for the gruppe-m! i have mine still sitting in the box i cant wait to get tuned!!!
Old Feb 9, 2010, 08:15 AM
  #9  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
vf22wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: 860
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not bad
Old Feb 9, 2010, 08:41 AM
  #10  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
chidevildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Des Plaines
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im glad GST is showing the numbers and what's was done here but my question is the guy tuned has full bolt ons... and he is 300+ ? what gives?
Old Feb 9, 2010, 11:28 AM
  #11  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chidevildog
Im glad GST is showing the numbers and what's was done here but my question is the guy tuned has full bolt ons... and he is 300+ ? what gives?
I don't see a large increase in peak power from lightly modded to full bolt ons with the stock turbo with 91 oct. The turbo just runs out of breath and the low octane prevents more ignition timing. With higher octane (like E85) there are nice increases but the turbo still runs out of breath at a point. Also keep in mind this Evo in this thread has a HFC. A test pipe would be a 10-15whp gain which would put it around 32X whp.

Once you bolt on a larger turbo is when all the bolt ons work well as supporting mods and the power increases a ton over the stock turbo.

I have been seeing 60+ whp gains from the stock turbo to Dom 2.0, BBK Full, etc.

The highest Evo 10 stock turbo on 91 oct on our dyno so far has been 320/320 with full bolt ons, but stock cams, most are around 310-315.

The highest Evo 9 stock turbo on our dyno on 91 oct has been 339 whp with full bolt ons, cams, porting, etc.
Old Feb 9, 2010, 11:49 AM
  #12  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
chidevildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Des Plaines
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
I don't see a large increase in peak power from lightly modded to full bolt ons with the stock turbo with 91 oct. The turbo just runs out of breath and the low octane prevents more ignition timing. With higher octane (like E85) there are nice increases but the turbo still runs out of breath at a point. Also keep in mind this Evo in this thread has a HFC. A test pipe would be a 10-15whp gain which would put it around 32X whp.

Once you bolt on a larger turbo is when all the bolt ons work well as supporting mods and the power increases a ton over the stock turbo.

I have been seeing 60+ whp gains from the stock turbo to Dom 2.0, BBK Full, etc.

The highest Evo 10 stock turbo on 91 oct on our dyno so far has been 320/320 with full bolt ons, but stock cams, most are around 310-315.

The highest Evo 9 stock turbo on our dyno on 91 oct has been 339 whp with full bolt ons, cams, porting, etc.
thanks GST for breaking it down for me....
Old Feb 9, 2010, 12:12 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
mlomker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Saint Paul
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice power for 91.
Old Feb 10, 2010, 08:03 PM
  #14  
Newbie
 
MARQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 79
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by orthojoe
Maybe I'm missing something, but this car with all of it's bolt-on parts isnt making much more power than the GSR in the thread below this one with just a magnaflow catback and AEM intake. Does this mean I just wasted a bunch of money bolting parts onto my car?
I think I got lucky on that one. I threw the AEM intake and MF catback on because I've been reading that some of the evo x piping is adequate enough for higher hp #s, thus do not need to be replaced until one is ready for a bigger turbo. As Bryan said, a bigger turbo is the important part on the 10 to really get the flow/hp going...or going E85 of course.
Old Feb 10, 2010, 08:33 PM
  #15  
Newbie
 
Flaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bronx,NYC/Germany/Romania
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice numbers and good information.


Quick Reply: 2010 Evo GSR - Simple Bolt ons



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:02 AM.