* 2011 Evo X GSR Baseline Dyno *

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jun 16, 2011 | 10:26 AM

#16

dazz

Thread Starter

Evolving Member

Joined: Dec 2001

Posts: 147

Likes: 0

From: DFW, Texas

Thanks for the correction Calvin!

Dyno graph with just a drop in filter.

Jun 16, 2011 | 12:14 PM

#17

Pimplay2

Newbie

Joined: Dec 2008

Posts: 20

Likes: 0

From: DMV

awesome results, i wonder what it would run with full bolts ons and factory map

Jun 16, 2011 | 06:45 PM

#18

The__J__Factor

Newbie

Joined: Dec 2008

Posts: 72

Likes: 0

From: Gold Coast

^ Im interested to see it as well with bolt ons, no tune.

Jun 17, 2011 | 04:35 AM

#19

Pimplay2

Newbie

Joined: Dec 2008

Posts: 20

Likes: 0

From: DMV

Another question?

What are the A/F ratio at WOT for 2011 models?

My UEGO reads around 10 area but it might because of intake leaning it out

Last edited by Pimplay2; Jun 21, 2011 at 10:18 AM.

Jun 17, 2011 | 11:23 AM

#20

dazz

Thread Starter

Evolving Member

Joined: Dec 2001

Posts: 147

Likes: 0

From: DFW, Texas

Quote:

Originally Posted by The__J__Factor

^ Im interested to see it as well with bolt ons, no tune.

That is the direction I will properly take without any tuning in the near future. Basically your basic BPU setup or turbo back exhaust, then hit the dyno again.
If the numbers doesn't satisfy me, I will then get it tune with the AP. Stay tune...

Jun 17, 2011 | 11:28 AM

#21

Kracka

Evolved Member

iTrader: (49)

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts: 8,970

Likes: 17

From: Prosper, TX

^You should have let Cobb test their beta 2011 AP maps on your car

Doing bolt-ons without a tune seems silly to me. Why spend all that money on parts yet stop a few hundred short of configuring your ECU to fully maximize the benefits of them?

Either way though, it's your car so as long as you're happy then we're all good!

Last edited by Kracka; Jun 17, 2011 at 11:32 AM.

Jun 17, 2011 | 11:30 AM

#22

dazz

Thread Starter

Evolving Member

Joined: Dec 2001

Posts: 147

Likes: 0

From: DFW, Texas

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pimplay2

Another question?

What are the A/F ratio at WOT for 2011 models?

My UEGO reads around 12 area but it might because of intake leaning it out

Here is the graph with the A/F! It average around 10 across the band.

Jun 17, 2011 | 11:48 AM

#23

MikeD

Newbie

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 42

Likes: 0

From: Philadelphia

Nice numbers!

Jun 18, 2011 | 08:20 PM

#24

pikkagtr

Evolving Member

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 106

Likes: 0

From: San Jose

Quote:

Originally Posted by WW-GSR

That's pretty good power at the wheels! It seems like there's not much parasitic powertrain losses sustained on the X's..

Mitsu probably under rate them for BHP

Jun 19, 2011 | 08:08 AM

#25

fastevo03

Evolving Member

iTrader: (14)

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 147

Likes: 0

The magazine tested the 2011 Evo and it was faster

Jun 19, 2011 | 08:30 AM

#26

Pimplay2

Newbie

Joined: Dec 2008

Posts: 20

Likes: 0

From: DMV

yea it ran 13.0 in 1.4 mile when the previous years were like 13.2-13.4

Aug 23, 2011 | 12:26 PM

#27

gabrod72

Newbie

Joined: Jan 2011

Posts: 61

Likes: 0

From: Texas

Interesting numbers indeed. Now I know why the 2011 models went up in price

I wonder whether the Cobb stage 1 MAP would work better than the stock flash? My 2010 GSR seems more powerful with stage 1 Cobb map than with stock, but I wonder if it would even come close to those numbers using it.