Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

509whp 35R X

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 06:46 PM
  #1  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
509whp 35R X

Josh brought his car in after some careful planning and with some specific goals in mind. He wanted 500whp, he wanted it on pump, and he needed it as snappy as possible.

After some debating about a TS setup over the Single on a 35R equipped X, we landed with a tried and true HTA3582 surrounded by an ETS turbo kit. A 3.5" intercooler and single exit exhaust rounded up the mods. A stock pump teamed with an inline 255 feeding a set of FIC900s resulted in some really nice gains.

Here are the results-



After our recent testing with EGT in the X we opted to leave it on the rich side for extended safety. This car still has stock cams and as mentioned is on 92 octane so we left it where it is nice and safe. As you can see though this turbo really wants to stretch its legs so either more boost on racegas or a bigger motor would really come in handy I think.

Aaron
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 07:45 PM
  #2  
Cannonballer's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
How much is spool affected by the stock cams?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 08:12 PM
  #3  
sstevojr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
From: 805-Conejo Valley
Man, shift that power 1k rpm to the right and I've died and gone to heaven
Great power!
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 08:48 PM
  #4  
2003evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: FLO-RIDA
nice gains on pump and did i read that psi right 23.7
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 11:36 PM
  #5  
akauf's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: New Holland, Pa
so this is a twin scroll set up?

I just got some twin scroll hot parts and I am torn on what turbo to run
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2012 | 12:59 AM
  #6  
nonschlont's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 2
From: Ca
Originally Posted by 2003evo8
nice gains on pump and did i read that psi right 23.7
27 peak, and 23.7 up top.
Lots of room left, if the op builds the motor.
Nice work Aaron!
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2012 | 05:14 AM
  #7  
2003evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: FLO-RIDA
can someone post pic on the turbo on car
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2012 | 07:50 AM
  #8  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
This is still the turbo I want for my cars next upgrade. Love the setup!

Also curious if its twinscroll, I am guessing no.

This is a good battle vs. the 5858 in my mind.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2012 | 08:44 AM
  #9  
bobby.is.rad's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
It's safe to spin a stock motor to 8k? (not doubting, asking a serious question.)
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2012 | 08:54 AM
  #10  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Debatable...tuning is important though if you are going to do it.

I have seen X rods hate life much more with higher torque then revving to 8k. I don't think its too big of an issue.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2012 | 08:55 AM
  #11  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
It is not a twin scroll. The reason is the biggest housing is the 1.06 T4 and I dont think that is a good match for how well the 4B11 breathes. Stock cams dont affect spool adversely, no.

Yeah boost hit 27 peak and then tapered down to 26 out the top. The 23.7 you saw is lag in the dyno recording the MAP sensor input relative to rpm.

You want the power further to the right? I presume you mean to the left?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2012 | 09:01 AM
  #12  
bobby.is.rad's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Murlo, you kind of answered another question I had. If one had dyno queen aspirations and wanted the most hp possible, would it less stressful on the 4B11 to increase the torque and only rev to 7,500 rpms, or wind it out to 8,000 rpms? The good thing about increasing the redline is you only add additional stress when you're revving it that high. Increased torque would be there at all times (for better or for worse.)

With the redline increased, this car makes great torque from 5,000 to 8,000 rpms. 3,000 rpms of usable power ain't too shabby. The power numbers are pretty incredible as well.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2012 | 10:32 AM
  #13  
MarineScout13's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Madison WI
Those are some nice numbers for the turbo.

And murlo I'd love to see your setup with either an HTA3582 or HTA3586
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2012 | 11:59 AM
  #14  
jager00's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: maryland
Wow that's alot of power. Do you have any track times to go along with those numbers?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2012 | 12:31 PM
  #15  
sstevojr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
From: 805-Conejo Valley
You want the power further to the right? I presume you mean to the left?
ooopppppps yes the left
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:17 AM.