Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

2013 evo x gsr ivey tuned - basic bolt ons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2013 | 02:12 PM
  #16  
Darksun280's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: ny
Try not to let numbers bother you. It's not like they are standardized across the board. If the car drives and feels nice you should be happy. Also a Test pipe and DP will free up some more ponies for you.

Good luck with your car.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2013 | 05:20 AM
  #17  
Initial_r90's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by whickedGSR
A mustang dyno reads lower than a dyne jet. From what i understand my numbers on dynojet would be more around 360-380awhp and like 340trq

I was just saying that because my Evo VIII made 299/315 @ 24.5 psi on a mustang dyno with stock turbo, bolt ons and HKS 264 cams
Reply
Old May 15, 2013 | 07:16 AM
  #18  
ddlopresti's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 466
Likes: 19
From: New York
adding ets 3.5 inch intercooler and LICP and cobb dual exit catback with an ivey retune, what do you think those parts would add? That brings me up to full boltons with a stock DP
Reply
Old May 21, 2013 | 01:56 PM
  #19  
ddlopresti's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 466
Likes: 19
From: New York
Originally Posted by ddlopresti
adding ets 3.5 inch intercooler and LICP and cobb dual exit catback with an ivey retune, what do you think those parts would add? That brings me up to full boltons with a stock DP
So i added the ets 3.5 and cobb catback and got a retune and gained only 6 HP and lost 3 tq for 320/320.

Gained about 10-15 hp between 5300-7000 rpms and i can definitely feel a difference after 5krpms, but i'm surprised the peak numbers didn't go up that much

Also it spools about 400rpms faster to peak tq

could the ets HFC really be holding me back that much or is the cobb cat back just very restrictive for aftermarket catbacks and that is keeping my peak numbers down?
Reply
Old May 21, 2013 | 05:32 PM
  #20  
ikt's Avatar
ikt
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 11
From: the internet
Originally Posted by daasca
I got tuned last week at Iveytune. Mods are in sig. 308/327.
absolutely legit numbers.
Reply
Old May 29, 2013 | 01:22 PM
  #21  
steinvb12's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 644
Likes: 3
From: Reading, PA
Originally Posted by ddlopresti
So i added the ets 3.5 and cobb catback and got a retune and gained only 6 HP and lost 3 tq for 320/320.

Gained about 10-15 hp between 5300-7000 rpms and i can definitely feel a difference after 5krpms, but i'm surprised the peak numbers didn't go up that much

Also it spools about 400rpms faster to peak tq

could the ets HFC really be holding me back that much or is the cobb cat back just very restrictive for aftermarket catbacks and that is keeping my peak numbers down?
That tells you your biggest restriction right now is the high flow cat. You probably would have gained more by going with a test pipe instead of the intercooler.

The stock intercooler isn't all that bad on the stock turbo. Neither is the stock intake (with the help of an aftermarket filter). Once you free up the exhaust, the stock turbo doesn't really flow enough to warrant upgrades in those areas. Will they help? Sure. But not in the bang for your buck department.

Don't get too caught up in the #'s. You can take your car back tomorrow with no changes, and it will make + or - 5 hp difference. It could be up one day and down the next day. No big deal. It just tells you ABOUT where you are.
Reply
Old May 29, 2013 | 01:58 PM
  #22  
MR. EVO MR's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 4
From: :noitacoL
Cams will make a huge difference on top!
Reply
Old May 30, 2013 | 07:10 AM
  #23  
ddlopresti's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 466
Likes: 19
From: New York
Originally Posted by steinvb12
That tells you your biggest restriction right now is the high flow cat. You probably would have gained more by going with a test pipe instead of the intercooler.

The stock intercooler isn't all that bad on the stock turbo. Neither is the stock intake (with the help of an aftermarket filter). Once you free up the exhaust, the stock turbo doesn't really flow enough to warrant upgrades in those areas. Will they help? Sure. But not in the bang for your buck department.

Don't get too caught up in the #'s. You can take your car back tomorrow with no changes, and it will make + or - 5 hp difference. It could be up one day and down the next day. No big deal. It just tells you ABOUT where you are.
Thanks for the input - i ordered a test pipe and down pipe (recirc) from ETS and i'm going to install and then get a retune - i hope I'll get up to at least 335/335 if not the 340 range
Reply
Old May 30, 2013 | 12:41 PM
  #24  
Mikey6273's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Fort Lee, NJ
Originally Posted by ddlopresti
Thanks for the input - i ordered a test pipe and down pipe (recirc) from ETS and i'm going to install and then get a retune - i hope I'll get up to at least 335/335 if not the 340 range
Doable considering I have a high flow cat and hit 330 at Ivey.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2013 | 09:37 PM
  #25  
ddlopresti's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 466
Likes: 19
From: New York
Originally Posted by Mikey6273
Doable considering I have a high flow cat and hit 330 at Ivey.
Had test pipe and downpipe installed and was surprised by the gains. Went from 320/320 to 344/368 -car feel amazing and sounds so mean when I am on it!
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2013 | 05:55 AM
  #26  
Jake.barratt's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Those numbers seem fine to me!
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2014 | 05:22 AM
  #27  
BuseRockS's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: New York
_________

2008 Evo x gsr . Ams uicp. Ams downpipe. Ams intake. Ams test pipe. Ams single cat back exhaust. Did 363 whp untuned on a mustang dyno. Good or bad numbers?
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2014 | 06:02 AM
  #28  
Darksun280's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: ny
Originally Posted by BuseRockS
2008 Evo x gsr . Ams uicp. Ams downpipe. Ams intake. Ams test pipe. Ams single cat back exhaust. Did 363 whp untuned on a mustang dyno. Good or bad numbers?
Whos dyno was it?
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2014 | 06:15 AM
  #29  
BuseRockS's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: New York
MR performance in Long Island New York
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2014 | 06:33 AM
  #30  
BuseRockS's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: New York
________

Originally Posted by Darksun280
Whos dyno was it?
What you think? And follow e-spec on IG 👍
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:53 PM.