Kozmic Evo X MR 6870 Record
#1
Evo X MR SST Precision 6870 952/635
Finally getting around to posting my car up. SAE 933/622 Standard 952/635 Dyno Jet.
Kozmic built 2.2L Manley internals
Kelford 214-C
Precision 6870 Turbo
ETS T4 Twin Scroll Turbo Kit
ID 2000s
Custom Dodson/Kozmic 14 plate Clutch Pakc
Open Source Tune
E85-Actual was roughly 76%
Kozmic built 2.2L Manley internals
Kelford 214-C
Precision 6870 Turbo
ETS T4 Twin Scroll Turbo Kit
ID 2000s
Custom Dodson/Kozmic 14 plate Clutch Pakc
Open Source Tune
E85-Actual was roughly 76%
Last edited by PDCC_EVO; Apr 28, 2018 at 02:13 PM.
The following users liked this post:
white01ss (Sep 15, 2018)
#2
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is huge amount of power for an X (or any car for that matter) to put down. That it is going through the SST is amazing. My hat is off to you and everyone involved in the build.
Do you care to share what it took to get the SST to cope with that amount of power?
Do you care to share what it took to get the SST to cope with that amount of power?
#6
Rev limit is set 8600 but the way its tuned currently its optimal shift point is between 7-7500rpm. After some strengthening upgrades we will change it up and rev it out quite a bit more. Not sure on the boost curve. I don't have it on any of the graphs I have and we didn't look at it at the shop while I was there.
#7
Rev limit is set 8600 but the way its tuned currently its optimal shift point is between 7-7500rpm. After some strengthening upgrades we will change it up and rev it out quite a bit more. Not sure on the boost curve. I don't have it on any of the graphs I have and we didn't look at it at the shop while I was there.
Trending Topics
#13
I am not sure on the compression as the engine was built by the previous owner and the invoice is just listed as a stage package.
As far as EFR vs PTE goes, I nor Kozmic are a fan of the BW turbos.
Great #’s!
what made you guys go with a 2.2 compared to a 2.0? I am not sure on the compression or why he went with a 2.2 as the engine was built by the previous owner and the invoice is just listed as a stage package. The car was originally built for autocross
was fitment if the 6870 any issue? There were no fitment issues but its very close to the cam sensor shield.
any reason as to why you chose it over the 9180 EFR?
what made you guys go with a 2.2 compared to a 2.0? I am not sure on the compression or why he went with a 2.2 as the engine was built by the previous owner and the invoice is just listed as a stage package. The car was originally built for autocross
was fitment if the 6870 any issue? There were no fitment issues but its very close to the cam sensor shield.
any reason as to why you chose it over the 9180 EFR?