Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Kozmic Evo X MR 6870 Record

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2018 | 04:42 PM
  #1  
PDCC_EVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 55
Likes: 2
From: Sulphur, LA
Evo X MR SST Precision 6870 952/635

Finally getting around to posting my car up. SAE 933/622 Standard 952/635 Dyno Jet.
Kozmic built 2.2L Manley internals
Kelford 214-C
Precision 6870 Turbo
ETS T4 Twin Scroll Turbo Kit
ID 2000s
Custom Dodson/Kozmic 14 plate Clutch Pakc
Open Source Tune
E85-Actual was roughly 76%



Attached Thumbnails Kozmic Evo X MR 6870 Record-record-952.jpg   Kozmic Evo X MR 6870 Record-dyno-graph-933.png  

Last edited by PDCC_EVO; Apr 28, 2018 at 02:13 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2018 | 05:25 AM
  #2  
Cannonballer's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
That is huge amount of power for an X (or any car for that matter) to put down. That it is going through the SST is amazing. My hat is off to you and everyone involved in the build.

Do you care to share what it took to get the SST to cope with that amount of power?
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2018 | 10:11 AM
  #3  
PDCC_EVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 55
Likes: 2
From: Sulphur, LA
Originally Posted by Cannonballer
That is huge amount of power for an X (or any car for that matter) to put down. That it is going through the SST is amazing. My hat is off to you and everyone involved in the build.

Do you care to share what it took to get the SST to cope with that amount of power?
Thanks, it has a prototype Dodson Sportsman/Kozmic 14 plate clutch pack and a conservative tune keeping the RPMs kinda low. Hard to believe with the power it already has but we still have a few PSI to play with and a good bit more power it can make.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2018 | 08:50 AM
  #4  
ETS Michael's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 54
From: Vancouver, WA



This is so awesome!

- Robert
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2018 | 10:20 PM
  #5  
BEWST's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Dover DE
how long before you let it rip to 8800? what are 6870 and what did the boost curve look like?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2018 | 08:30 AM
  #6  
PDCC_EVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 55
Likes: 2
From: Sulphur, LA
Originally Posted by BEWST
how long before you let it rip to 8800? what are 6870 and what did the boost curve look like?


Rev limit is set 8600 but the way its tuned currently its optimal shift point is between 7-7500rpm. After some strengthening upgrades we will change it up and rev it out quite a bit more. Not sure on the boost curve. I don't have it on any of the graphs I have and we didn't look at it at the shop while I was there.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2018 | 05:33 AM
  #7  
BEWST's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Dover DE
Originally Posted by PDCC_EVO
Rev limit is set 8600 but the way its tuned currently its optimal shift point is between 7-7500rpm. After some strengthening upgrades we will change it up and rev it out quite a bit more. Not sure on the boost curve. I don't have it on any of the graphs I have and we didn't look at it at the shop while I was there.
i meant to ask what AR the 6870 is.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2018 | 06:51 AM
  #8  
PDCC_EVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 55
Likes: 2
From: Sulphur, LA
Originally Posted by bewst
i meant to ask what ar the 6870 is.


1.15
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2018 | 12:19 PM
  #9  
BEWST's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Dover DE
Originally Posted by PDCC_EVO
1.15
Thats good and early power from a 6870. What compression ratio?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2018 | 09:19 AM
  #10  
jake33's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Great #’s!

what made you guys go with a 2.2 compared to a 2.0?

was fitment if the 6870 any issue?

any reason as to why you chose it over the 9180 EFR?
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2018 | 08:01 AM
  #11  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by jake33
Great #’s!

what made you guys go with a 2.2 compared to a 2.0?

was fitment if the 6870 any issue?

any reason as to why you chose it over the 9180 EFR?
I think the PTE6766 is more comparible to the EFR9180 at around 94 lbs/min flow. I know the PTE6870 G2 is closer to 110 lbs/min and bigger numbers especially for a drag racing or 1/2 mile & 1 mile event scenario.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2018 | 02:52 AM
  #12  
Phaz3's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 76
Likes: 8
From: Home
Wow. That's all.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2018 | 06:24 AM
  #13  
PDCC_EVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 55
Likes: 2
From: Sulphur, LA
Originally Posted by BEWST
Thats good and early power from a 6870. What compression ratio?
I am not sure on the compression as the engine was built by the previous owner and the invoice is just listed as a stage package.

Originally Posted by jake33
Great #’s!

what made you guys go with a 2.2 compared to a 2.0? I am not sure on the compression or why he went with a 2.2 as the engine was built by the previous owner and the invoice is just listed as a stage package. The car was originally built for autocross

was fitment if the 6870 any issue? There were no fitment issues but its very close to the cam sensor shield.

any reason as to why you chose it over the 9180 EFR?
As far as EFR vs PTE goes, I nor Kozmic are a fan of the BW turbos.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2018 | 10:18 AM
  #14  
jake33's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
I see. Why the 1.15 AR and the not the V-band .96?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2018 | 11:41 AM
  #15  
BEWST's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Dover DE
Originally Posted by jake33
I see. Why the 1.15 AR and the not the V-band .96?
likely because he is TS anyway, and thats about 20% difference in ar, so it balances out
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:05 AM.