Am I missing something... I can't seem to find where to "defeat" the airflow/torque limits, and haven't seen any maps that include that... or, am I the only one?

 

Nevermind... I just refreshed the Cobb page, and found the 1.04 maps... in the notes, it says that the Torque limits have been removed, but, doesn't mention airflow... is that just an oversight, or?

 

ARC maps anybody?

 

Same here.

 

arc uses the stock housing

try a panel filter map in it

and check fuel trims

 

Someone mentioned that the AEM map was the only one that worked with his ARC box. Can anyone with the ARC box and an AP confirm which map(s) work?

 

ARC or HKS or gruppe m imo

 

I first tried the stock stage 1 map on my Evo with ARC box. It didnt feel much better than the stock Mitsu map. I then tried the stage 1 HKS panel filter map and the throttle felt soo much more responsive. There was no lag off the line and although upper RPM didnt feel any more power the low-end rsponsiveness was very impressive. I think you were right about how the ARC uses the stock MAF and just basically is a panel filter(less restrictive).

What about fuel trims did you want me to check? Like 91 vs 93?

 

Harman motive intake maps please

 

AMS map maybe?

 

Well they might look the same HM and AMS intakes but they are different. HM uses the AEM dryflow filter and the AMS ones uses the oilbase filter. Also the ams intake is a lilbit shorter in length compared to HM. Also you IMO the AMS map is weak. I've tried the AEM intake and it feels way better and maybe because AEM intake and HM intakes both use the dryflow filter.

 

I just downloaded the Stage 2 AEM 93 octane map to my Cobb AP, then re-flashed the Evo...so far so good, car seems to be a little peppier off the line.

A weird thing though, the file date for the version 1.04 AEM 93+ Stage 2 map states:

Dec05 07:06:37 2006

 

i would vote for ams cold air intake. And satge 3 maps

 

is the ams map for the sri or the cai? does it really matter?

 

same here