First Open Port 2 data logger released
#47
Evolved Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: michigan
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know it's not exactly topic related, but I'll ask anyways:
Does anyone know where I can find the specifications of the mid/high level protocol/message formatting mitsubishi is using over the various CAN buses?
Edit: I presume the only high level protocol that is known is the one used at the diagnostics port.
Does anyone know where I can find the specifications of the mid/high level protocol/message formatting mitsubishi is using over the various CAN buses?
Edit: I presume the only high level protocol that is known is the one used at the diagnostics port.
Last edited by madcows; Jan 20, 2009 at 05:52 PM.
#50
I picked up a EVO9 ECU this end today as all testing with MUT-Monitor is using a EVO6 ECU I have here.
I can confirm that it works fine with OP2.0 but also I did not have to short out Pin 1 to Pin4 as the ECU does not actually have a wire running to Pin1 of the ECU.
What proceedure are you using to try and log.
1.) Make sure Igntion is turned off and insert cable.
2.) Turn ignition switch on but do not start engine.
3.) Hit the Monitor button.
If someone else confirms it does not work then I will knock up a application that gives more logs on requests and answers.
Now I have the EVO9 ECU I also tried PCMscan that uses the OP2.0 cable and uses the OBD-II rather than MUT Protocol.
I can confirm that is VERY slow as well, if not slower than Mut-Monitor.
Is there any other programs that use the OP2.0 for logging OBD-II?
I can confirm that it works fine with OP2.0 but also I did not have to short out Pin 1 to Pin4 as the ECU does not actually have a wire running to Pin1 of the ECU.
What proceedure are you using to try and log.
1.) Make sure Igntion is turned off and insert cable.
2.) Turn ignition switch on but do not start engine.
3.) Hit the Monitor button.
If someone else confirms it does not work then I will knock up a application that gives more logs on requests and answers.
Now I have the EVO9 ECU I also tried PCMscan that uses the OP2.0 cable and uses the OBD-II rather than MUT Protocol.
I can confirm that is VERY slow as well, if not slower than Mut-Monitor.
Is there any other programs that use the OP2.0 for logging OBD-II?
#51
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Is there any other programs that use the OP2.0 for logging OBD-II?
ECUEdit (maybe, haven't heard back from them regarding support for the X)
ECUFlash (eventually)
This is off the top of my head, in a hurry at the moment...
#52
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mtz, CA
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes someone here who is in the ECUFlash beta has confirmed that he uses PCMScan for data logging using the OP2 cable, however yes it's only the basics as they don't support nor have an idea when they will support Mitsu PID's.
#53
I believe the EvoScan crew was trying to get the Evo X to communicate in MUT mode as well. Not sure if they ever succeeded using the first gen Tactrix cable. You may want to chat with them.
Can I ask why you are shorting pins together to access MUT mode (Mitsubishi Factory Logging/Diag)?
Cheers,
Can I ask why you are shorting pins together to access MUT mode (Mitsubishi Factory Logging/Diag)?
Cheers,
#54
Been playing more with PCMscan and it soes only seem to support OBD-II ISO 9141-2 commands via the OP2.0 and not the MUT requests.
So seems Mut-Monitor is the first with OP2.0 to do this, so I am happy for now
#55
When I wired up the EVO9 ECU today, I noticed it did not have this Pin1 wire from the ECU and Mut-Monitor, Evoscan etc etc worked fine without it.
Later today it was confirmed that EVO 4-6 need these pins shorted and EVO 7 upwards do not.
All a big learning experience, but getting there
#56
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
UPDATE:
Double-checked that I'd been connecting correctly and still nothing.
Regardless of how I connect and with or without the 1,4 short (which now appears to be unnecessary) I'm still getting the same 'Invalid Reply or Timeout' message.
This is the procedure I've been following; I've tried other variations to see if it changed anything without any luck.
I'll see if I can get someone else with a OP2.0 cable to give it a shot.
Double-checked that I'd been connecting correctly and still nothing.
Regardless of how I connect and with or without the 1,4 short (which now appears to be unnecessary) I'm still getting the same 'Invalid Reply or Timeout' message.
If someone else confirms it does not work then I will knock up a application that gives more logs on requests and answers.
#57
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mtz, CA
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can confirm that it DOES NOT WORK with OP2. I just went out after lowering the car on the lift just enough to reach the cable and OBD-ii port. And same problem:
Opening Com Port 4
Started 6:17:20 PM 1/21/2009
Sending 5 Baud Init
Changing to 15625 Baud
Connected! 6:17:20 PM 1/21/2009
Starting to Monitor
Invalid Reply or Timeout
Disconnected
Stopped 6:17:26 PM 1/21/2009
Started 6:17:20 PM 1/21/2009
Sending 5 Baud Init
Changing to 15625 Baud
Connected! 6:17:20 PM 1/21/2009
Starting to Monitor
Invalid Reply or Timeout
Disconnected
Stopped 6:17:26 PM 1/21/2009
#60
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mtz, CA
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Man that makes me sad... Looks like no one really cares about Evo X data logging. EvoScan is meh on Evo X support. Why is development on Evo X something people don't care about? I mean when future Evo's come out is it gonna revert back to the old system? We need to stop catering to past technology and help on working current and future builds...