Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

EvoScan for Evo X Beta Parameter CAN-ID's? Log attached

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 11:12 PM
  #31  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
Here are some stock timing logs for your cross referencing pleasure. 91 octane

Code:
TIMING	RPM
32	2504
26	2563
22	2590
21	2629
21	2629
20	2707
20	2766
19	2820
19	2875
16	2938
14	3016
14	3086
12	3168
10	3258
10	3355
10	3355
9	3508
8	3602
7	3719
8	3828
9	3957
10	4066
10	4180
10	4297
10	4395
12	4512
12	4512
13	4660
13	4781
13	4875
14	4984
14	5074
15	5168
15	5266
17	5344
18	5457
18	5539
18	5539
19	5684
19	5773
19	5844
19	5934
19	6023
19	6109
20	6199
21	6262
21	6355
22	6434
22	6434
22	6543
22	6598
21	6672
21	6750
23	6824
23	6895
23	6965
23	7027
23	7094
24	7184
24	7184
25	7281
25	7340
25	7383
25	7457
25	7531
24	7582
25	7699
Code:
TIMING RPM    LOAD
20	2523	107.8
21	2590	114.9
19	2641	122.7
17	2699	129
17	2773	135.3
17	2773	135.3
16	2863	144.7
14	2930	153.7
13	3012	162.7
10	3098	174.1
10	3203	184.3
10	3301	191.4
9	3383	200
9	3480	207.5
9	3613	212.5
9	3730	213.3
9	3730	213.3
10	3879	213.3
10	4016	216.1
10	4133	220
11	4258	222
10	4379	222.7
11	4492	214.5
12	4613	211.8
14	4727	212.2
14	4832	212.9
15	4957	211
15	4957	211
15	5082	210.2
16	5184	210.2
16	5289	209.8
17	5395	205.9
19	5484	203.1
19	5594	202
19	5688	200
19	5785	198
19	5879	197.3
19	5965	197.3
19	5965	197.3
20	6102	194.9
21	6188	192.5
21	6281	190.6
22	6355	187.8
22	6449	185.5
22	6543	183.5
23	6625	182.7
23	6695	182.7
24	6781	180.8
24	6848	180
24	6848	180
24	6957	179.2
24	7035	178.4
24	7109	178.4
24	7184	178
24	7246	176.9
25	7309	175.7
26	7383	174.1
26	7457	173.7
26	7523	172.2
26	7582	171.8
Code:
TIMING	RPM	  LOAD
17	2504	120.4
17	2563	124.7
17	2633	129
17	2711	134.9
15	2781	141.2
14	2867	149
14	2867	149
13	2980	160
10	3066	170.6
10	3184	183.1
10	3273	191.8
9	3391	199.2
9	3508	204.3
9	3641	204.7
9	3777	205.9
10	3898	205.5
11	4031	209
11	4031	209
11	4211	212.2
11	4340	213.3
12	4477	203.9
13	4594	200
15	4719	196.5
15	4848	200
15	4965	202.7
15	5094	202.7
16	5207	203.5
17	5336	198.8
17	5336	198.8
19	5496	192.5
19	5605	190.2
19	5723	191
19	5832	190.6
20	5949	189
20	6047	187.8
21	6156	187.1
21	6270	184.7
21	6355	184.3
22	6453	180.4
22	6453	180.4
22	6590	180
22	6680	178.8
24	6789	178.4
22	6867	179.2
23	6926	180
22	7027	179.6
23	7121	176.9
23	7199	175.7
24	7289	173.7
25	7289	173.7
25	7289	173.7
25	7469	176.1
25	7555	175.3
23	7582	156.1
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 11:32 PM
  #32  
WarmAndSCSI's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 160
Likes: 2
From: SLC, UT
I'm really starting to want to take a closer look at what load cells my tune is ending up in. Must be pretty high by my deductions.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 11:38 PM
  #33  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by WarmAndSCSI
I'm really starting to want to take a closer look at what load cells my tune is ending up in. Must be pretty high by my deductions.
I had a 10 hit 320-330 load at 31-33 psi the other day.

Normal 91 oct pump gas is around 260-270 ish

btw, send me a PM, I'm interested in some things.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 11:46 PM
  #34  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
The timing seems to be good (comparing with PCMScan) and since I'm running a Dominator 2.0 my abs load is pegged at 255 from 4000 RPM all the way to redline so I can't confirm those numbers
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 12:04 AM
  #35  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by WarmAndSCSI
yw.

The knock count/retard one I posted is definitely spot on. I tested it on another X today and I was able to identify the dealer filled the poor car with 85 or 87 before it left the lot... 13 counts stock! Pretty ridiculous. Even after reflashing the car was still dumping fuel and pulling timing due to the detected knock.
I wonder if this value is actually knock sum instead of the listed knock retard. If this were knock retard, the actual timing would've taken a huge dive (13 degrees worth) and I've never seen such thing happening on an EvoX yet. If it were sum, then that would've been around 4 degrees of timing which sounds about right. Also, you mentioned that you always see 1 or 2 degrees but maybe this is sum
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 08:34 AM
  #36  
WarmAndSCSI's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 160
Likes: 2
From: SLC, UT
Originally Posted by SiC
The timing seems to be good (comparing with PCMScan) and since I'm running a Dominator 2.0 my abs load is pegged at 255 from 4000 RPM all the way to redline so I can't confirm those numbers
I see the same with the load. Not useful at all, and also not anywhere near accurate.

I wonder how PCMScan is determining load...

Originally Posted by SiC
I wonder if this value is actually knock sum instead of the listed knock retard. If this were knock retard, the actual timing would've taken a huge dive (13 degrees worth) and I've never seen such thing happening on an EvoX yet. If it were sum, then that would've been around 4 degrees of timing which sounds about right. Also, you mentioned that you always see 1 or 2 degrees but maybe this is sum
I've seen 1-3 degrees of timing pull mostly. I believe the value is most analogous with a "knock sum," number-wise.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 03:31 PM
  #37  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by NMX
Does anyone have a log of a completely stock GSR they'd like to share? That would really help give a better idea of whether we are logging the right values.....
Here is my 100% stock log from an Evo X.
Attached Files
File Type: zip
stock.zip (4.2 KB, 0 views)
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 04:30 PM
  #38  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by WarmAndSCSI
I see the same with the load. Not useful at all, and also not anywhere near accurate.

I wonder how PCMScan is determining load...
Good question about PCMScan...... That thing is pretty accurate too, VERY useful when tuning.

Originally Posted by WarmAndSCSI
I've seen 1-3 degrees of timing pull mostly. I believe the value is most analogous with a "knock sum," number-wise.
I used your CAN 11-3 and finally got 1 count of knock (5000-6000 RPM) when I raised the boost. It didn't seem to pull timing so I'm thinking this isn't degrees.

Last edited by SiC; Apr 29, 2009 at 04:34 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 04:46 PM
  #39  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by nj1266
Here is my 100% stock log from an Evo X.
Don't you love the logging speed of PCMScan

The load values don't seem to exceed 240 on a stock USDM Evo X. I wonder if someone can test the CAN 20-1 to see if it's accurate. Other than it being capped at 255, I'm thinking it shows too high of a value.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 06:09 PM
  #40  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by SiC
Don't you love the logging speed of PCMScan

The load values don't seem to exceed 240 on a stock USDM Evo X. I wonder if someone can test the CAN 20-1 to see if it's accurate. Other than it being capped at 255, I'm thinking it shows too high of a value.
The more I use PCMScan the more I like. I only miss Konck Sum and IDC.

Have you found a way to log Injector Pulse Width? I looked but could not find much. If I can log IPW, then I can write a PID to log IDC.

The highest a stock X has logged in 4th gear is 231. An Evo X with a drop-in hits a hair less load and an Evo X with an intake hits a lot less load.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 06:17 PM
  #41  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by nj1266
The more I use PCMScan the more I like. I only miss Konck Sum and IDC.

Have you found a way to log Injector Pulse Width? I looked but could not find much. If I can log IPW, then I can write a PID to log IDC.

The highest a stock X has logged in 4th gear is 231. An Evo X with a drop-in hits a hair less load and an Evo X with an intake hits a lot less load.
I'm using 8-1 for IPW and the parameter WARMnSCSI posted for the IDC. Here's a log of my car (DOM2.0/Cos Cams/DW800 Injectors) in 3rd gear @27psi boost (all the way to redline).

Code:
TPS	RPM  InjDutyCycle KnockRetard AbsLoad
13.33	2406.25	3.45	0	46
20.78	2281.25	7.28	0	149
29.41	2468.75	8.52	0	200
38.82	2500	9.12	0	230
41.18	2500	9.6	0	250
40.78	2531.25	10.8	0	255
40	2531.25	11.62	0	255
46.67	2625	14.91	0	255
87.06	2687.5	15.25	0	255
86.67	2750	16.38	0	255
86.67	2875	17.17	0	255
84.31	2937.5	21.12	0	255
86.67	3031.25	23.1	0	255
86.67	3156.25	27.73	0	255
86.67	3312.5	31.68	0	255
86.67	3437.5	36.59	0	255
86.67	3562.5	42.12	0	255
86.67	3750	47.59	0	255
86.67	3906.25	50.35	0	255
86.67	4093.75	51.81	0	255
86.67	4250	56	0	255
86.67	4437.5	60.48	0	255
86.27	4593.75	61	0	255
86.27	4781.25	63.03	0	255
86.27	4937.5	68.27	0	255
86.27	5093.75	70.4	1	255
86.27	5281.25	72.96	1	255
86.27	5500	74.34	1	255
86.27	5625	74.81	1	255
86.27	5812.5	77.29	1	255
85.88	5937.5	80.22	0	255
86.27	6062.5	81.01	0	255
86.27	6250	80.4	0	255
86.27	6375	79.65	0	255
86.27	6531.25	79.8	0	255
86.27	6656.25	81.7	0	255
86.27	6812.5	83.22	0	255
86.27	6968.75	83.63	0	255
86.67	7062.5	86.64	0	255
86.27	7218.75	88.54	0	255
53.73	7906.25	0	0	195
I don't know if the IDC is 100% correct but the values are pretty close to what I saw on the ECUTek DeltaDash
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 06:35 PM
  #42  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by nj1266
The more I use PCMScan the more I like. I only miss Konck Sum and IDC.

Have you found a way to log Injector Pulse Width? I looked but could not find much. If I can log IPW, then I can write a PID to log IDC.

The highest a stock X has logged in 4th gear is 231. An Evo X with a drop-in hits a hair less load and an Evo X with an intake hits a lot less load.
Oh damn, you were refering to PCMScan for the IPW, sorry I posted the parameter for Evoscan above. I haven't found a way for PCMScan
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 07:18 PM
  #43  
Guru's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
From: Deeetroit
Originally Posted by WarmAndSCSI
I've found these to be working. Injector duty cycle is new and is a product of RPM and injector pulse width.

Code:
<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="TPS" LogReference="TPS" RequestID="CAN1-0" Eval="100*x/255" Unit="%" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="#00ab39" Display="Injector Pulse Width" LogReference="InjPulseWidth" RequestID="CAN8-1" Eval="0.256*x" Unit="ms" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="66" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="66" ScalingFactor="10" Notes="maybe 8-2 or 8-3 but looks like it will always be zero.&#xD;&#xA;" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Injector Duty Cycle" LogReference="InjDutyCycle" RequestID="CAN2-2" Eval="[InjPulseWidth]*31.25*x/1200" Unit="%" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="100" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="100" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="maybe 8-2 or 8-3 but looks like it will always be zero.&#xD;&#xA;" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="#c000ff" Display="Knock Retard" LogReference="KnockRetard" RequestID="CAN11-1" Eval="x" Unit="deg" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="10" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="10" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
I'm still working on load and boost. I see the MAP value but it seems to be capped at 125 kPa or ~18 PSI. Load is still a mystery to me. I may try combining 20-1 and 20-2 later. Maybe 20-3 has something to do with it.
How do you input these into the data file?
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 07:55 PM
  #44  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by Guru
How do you input these into the data file?
Open up the data xml in notepad or something. Scroll down to the EvoX section and change the CAN x-x numbers to what you want. If it's a new parameter, such as IDC, copy and past the entire line into the EvoX section.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 08:24 PM
  #45  
LaXGSR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: US
Thanks WarmAndSCSI for your contributions! They seem to work for me - now all we need is boost and load

BTW, I'm also at high elevation and I think my car at 5000 feet is hitting lower load cells than typical stock evo x's. I believe load is really topping out at between 180-200 at 3500-4500 rpm's and dropping from there (compared to a stock X at sea level that tops out between 200-220 load). Hitting lower load would explain the slightly higher timing advance values we're seeing.

Also, I tried both 11-1 and 11-3 for knock sum and both stay at zero in all my logs. I guess the only way to truly find out if it's working is to advance timing until it registers knock?

I'd appreciate anything you can share on boost or load logging!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:16 PM.