EvoScan for Evo X Beta Parameter CAN-ID's? Log attached

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

May 6, 2009 | 09:52 PM

#76

rogue

Evolved Member

iTrader: (34)

Joined: Jan 2003

Posts: 722

Likes: 1

From: DC/VA/MD & NJ/NY

Ahh, I guess editing from within EVOSCAN corrupts the XML file somehow. If I start with a fresh Data.xml and make the edits manually, then it saves and works fine. I bet I missed that small fact somewhere in this thread.

May 6, 2009 | 09:57 PM

#77

SiC

Evolved Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jun 2008

Posts: 1,018

Likes: 0

From: Kanagawa, Japan

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogue

Interesting problem for me. Once I make changes to my data.xml file, my item to log screen, where I can selected parameters, no longer shows up regardless of what "ECU" I select less the EFI choice.

I even went as far as to reload evoscan and had the same issue. Basically a blank screen.

Yeah, that's the same for everyone. If you want to edit the xml, you have to edit it in wordpad or something. Also, if you want to restore your previous data, grab the data.xml from the 2.6 beta update and put it into the install folder.

May 7, 2009 | 12:49 PM

#78

rogue

Evolved Member

iTrader: (34)

Joined: Jan 2003

Posts: 722

Likes: 1

From: DC/VA/MD & NJ/NY

I posted a new thread regarding using evoscan and determining why a P1235.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...cel-p1235.html

Daimon

May 8, 2009 | 01:09 AM

#79

Deannn

Evolving Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Sep 2008

Posts: 116

Likes: 0

From: Australia - Perth

Ive been playing around with Evoscan and my datalogs miss patches ? do i need to change some settings or something. I also changed around Knock to 11-1, few other things that i got of this topic but my logs dont look right, showing 18* knock retard.
Could this be real? :S i have 3" catback and HKS panel filter on 98RON.

Acer Laptop: T7300 @ 2ghz with 2gig ram, XP with SP3.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Dean

.

Attached Thumbnails

EvoScan for Evo X Beta Parameter CAN-ID's? Log attached-evoscan.jpg

Attached Files

EvoScanDataLog 2009.zip (15.8 KB, 0 views)

May 8, 2009 | 01:21 AM

#80

WarmAndSCSI

Account Disabled

Joined: Jan 2007

Posts: 160

Likes: 2

From: SLC, UT

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deannn

I don't see 18 anywhere... I see 8, which is OK. Try to minimize this value. It is indeed the correct knock sum/count. I've gotten my own tune down to a max of 1-2 counts.

May 8, 2009 | 01:49 AM

#81

Deannn

Evolving Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Sep 2008

Posts: 116

Likes: 0

From: Australia - Perth

ah duno where i saw 18, but theres few that say

LogID LogEntrySeconds TPS RPM KnockRetard

36 5/8/2009 55:22.8 2.65926 14.90 843.75 14 0 13

See the 13 one, is that 13 counts ?

May 8, 2009 | 05:52 AM

#82

SiC

Evolved Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jun 2008

Posts: 1,018

Likes: 0

From: Kanagawa, Japan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deannn

I don't understand your log..... were you just free reving the motor? I don't see any areas that you actually went WOT.

May 8, 2009 | 10:39 AM

#83

Deannn

Evolving Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Sep 2008

Posts: 116

Likes: 0

From: Australia - Perth

Quote:

Originally Posted by SiC

I don't understand your log..... were you just free reving the motor? I don't see any areas that you actually went WOT.

Nope was not free reving.

LogID 975 till 1125 i think.
Ill try get better ones tomorrow.

May 8, 2009 | 11:09 PM

#84

mrfred

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (50)

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 9,675

Likes: 132

From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarmAndSCSI

...

EvoScan is telling me 64/sec so I guess 8/sec if I'm logging 8 items? That's about what I see in my logs. 6-8 per second. Not great, but it works I guess.

I'm getting about the same logging rate on an Evo 10 I got to play with today. It seems that EvoScan is way slower than the 180 values/sec that Hamish said he was getting. Kind of a bummer compared to my Evo 9 where I get 160 values/sec.

In looking at the WOT logs, I'd say that there is lots of room to improve the logging parameters (finding correct logging parameters and correct scalings).

May 9, 2009 | 01:02 AM

#85

tephra

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 9,486

Likes: 67

From: Melbourne, Australia

yeah its a bit buggy..

hopefully he will release a new version with faster + reliable logs

May 10, 2009 | 12:18 AM

#86

GST Motorsports

Account Disabled

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 3,366

Likes: 2

From: Hayward

Quote:

Originally Posted by tephra

yeah its a bit buggy..

hopefully he will release a new version with faster + reliable logs

I get about 5-6 samples in a full 3rd gear pull. Almost 1 sample for every 1000 rpm.

May 10, 2009 | 01:27 AM

#87

tephra

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 9,486

Likes: 67

From: Melbourne, Australia

and whats wrong with that :P hehe

mine is better than that...

May 10, 2009 | 08:24 AM

#88

nj1266

Evolved Member

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 3,254

Likes: 13

From: USA

I am getting ~11 samples per second. I do not know why my Evoscan is behaving and yours is not!!

May 10, 2009 | 10:41 PM

#89

SiC

Evolved Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jun 2008

Posts: 1,018

Likes: 0

From: Kanagawa, Japan

Quote:

Originally Posted by GST Motorsports

Yea the adapters can be a pita sometimes. It's all app centric it seems like

My Keyspan works perfect with logging in Evoscan / Mitsulogger / Zeitronix

However It won't let me connect to the Zeitronix warning box to program it.

The adapter that Zeitronix sells however does.

I got the Keyspan adapter and it worked!!!!!

Thanks Bryan!