Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

AFR calibration map

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2010, 07:05 PM
  #1  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
Smile AFR calibration map

Hi All,

I have been sitting on this for a while, I am sure others have posted information about it, or even the maps themselves.

Basically this adjusts the Fuel Map lookup by adding or subtracting a percentage.

If you are interested, look at the changes between 52680017 and 52680018

It will appear in the Misc category, eventually when it gets included in ECUFlash it will be moved to the Fuel category

52680015:
Code:
<scaling name="Percent128" units="%" toexpr="x*100/128" frexpr="x*128/100" format="%.1f" min="0" max="100" inc="2" storagetype="uint8" endian="big"/>
<table name="Calibration Fuel Map" category="Misc" address="576d3" type="3D" swapxy="true" scaling="Percent128">
	<table name="Load" address="617d6" type="X Axis" elements="41" scaling="Load"/>
	<table name="RPM" address="617aa" type="Y Axis" elements="19" scaling="RPM"/>
</table>
53040010:
Code:
<scaling name="Percent128" units="%" toexpr="x*100/128" frexpr="x*128/100" format="%.1f" min="0" max="100" inc="2" storagetype="uint8" endian="big"/>
<table name="Calibration Fuel Map" category="Misc" address="576d7" type="3D" swapxy="true" scaling="Percent128">
	<table name="Load" address="61812" type="X Axis" elements="41" scaling="Load"/>
	<table name="RPM" address="617e6" type="Y Axis" elements="19" scaling="RPM"/>
</table>
I doubt it will be very useful to people, but something to think about

Cheers
D.
Old Jun 17, 2010, 07:37 PM
  #2  
Evolving Member
 
palmerblock's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmmm... another way to tune fuel.....
wondering if i should try....

has anyone else?
Old Jun 17, 2010, 07:43 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Clipse3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,185
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I am assuming that adding to the map increases fueling in that area of the map and subtracting a percentage from a area or value decreases fueling in that area...

Secondly, I wonder what would happen if you change all values to a static value of: 102.3
Old Jun 17, 2010, 07:57 PM
  #4  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
yeah i think so... but try it

yeah im not sure why this table exists in the first place really? like what was wrong with the fuel map? :P hehe
Old Jun 17, 2010, 08:55 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Clipse3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,185
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by tephra
yeah i think so... but try it

yeah im not sure why this table exists in the first place really? like what was wrong with the fuel map? :P hehe
Yeah that table looks really erratic in areas, except in in the full spool area it looks consistent.

I might trying setting everything to static number and see what happens...

I'll be like...
Old Jun 17, 2010, 09:25 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm thinking it is some sort of injector calibration. So, if they change injectors, they simple have to make a new one of these and not have to re-tune the car (and possibly re-tune 20 other configurations).
Old Jun 18, 2010, 12:22 AM
  #7  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have that as "injectorTime" in ms, not percent128 and the table being called "Injector Compensation Pulsewidth Adder" instead.

Not sure which one is actually correct though.

- Bryan
Old Jun 18, 2010, 02:45 AM
  #8  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
hrmm i'll have another look at the code ..
Old Jun 18, 2010, 06:40 AM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
derekste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if it is indeed a % modifier for the fuel map... wouldn't this be a very easy way to adjust the entire fuel map based off of something like the GM flex fuel sensor? may not be the "best" way to do it, but could be better than nothing for ethanol blend changes.
Old Jun 18, 2010, 07:06 AM
  #10  
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
scheides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Whoah that is a mind***, why would they do this? Gah so I'm guessing flattening this table will make tuning a bit easier

*edit* added screenshots.
Attached Thumbnails AFR calibration map-screen-shot-2010-06-18-9.06.55-am.jpg   AFR calibration map-screen-shot-2010-06-18-9.07.05-am.jpg  
Old Jun 18, 2010, 08:35 AM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Clipse3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,185
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by scheides
Whoah that is a mind***, why would they do this? Gah so I'm guessing flattening this table will make tuning a bit easier

*edit* added screenshots.
Testing this today...

Like I said, I'll static the number 102.3 (max) in the table and see what happens...

I think this table accounts for why we need to richen the **** out of our spool up, since that table is lower in those areas... This might make tuning more linear...
Old Jun 18, 2010, 09:20 AM
  #12  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
tonyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmmm... let us know the results clipse
Old Jun 18, 2010, 09:29 AM
  #13  
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
fostytou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 3,143
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
One nice thing is that you could use this map to calibrate your fuel map to your actual AFR, but that is probably a mis-use of it
Old Jun 18, 2010, 10:07 AM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Clipse3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,185
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Well one thing I noticed...

My idle LTFT went from -0.5 to -7.1...

Cruise went a little bit negative...

I'll do a comparison latter today... vs stock map and everything set to 102.3...

Also try everything about 100-110 load one to be 102.3 and leave everthing 1000rpm and below alone...
Old Jun 18, 2010, 10:39 AM
  #15  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here it is with pulsewidth... seems to make a little more sense:



Quick Reply: AFR calibration map



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:32 PM.