Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

logcfg.txt for logging onto microSD for ROM ID 53050009

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 30, 2010 | 05:53 PM
  #1  
germanracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Question logcfg.txt for logging onto microSD for ROM ID 53050009

Hey guys!

I got my OP 2.0 cable and I'm learning quickly, already got mode23 enabled, did my first log, compared my commercial tune to a base map and community tunes.

The one thing that I don't quite get yet is the logging onto microSD...

I tried it with the attached file that I found and edited a bit but I don't think I have it all figured out quite yet.

I'm on an EDM X MR with ROM ID: 53050009

Could you kindly take a look and see if you can spot any obvious mistakes?

PS: I'm trying to log when I turn on the cruise light...
PPS: Bonus question: How much bar/psi is safe with the SST? Not that much, right?

Thanks in advance guys, some GREAT resources on here, tuning bibles, tuning VIDEOS even, love it!!! My next step will most likely be getting a LC-1 if I can remotely justify it to myself...
Attached Files
File Type: txt
logcfg.txt (5.4 KB, 0 views)
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2010 | 08:18 PM
  #2  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
You probably have the incorrect address for the Cruise light switch request.

As far as PSI on SST. I currently run 27psi across on my Ralliart SST.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2010 | 04:14 AM
  #3  
germanracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Question

Originally Posted by razorlab
You probably have the incorrect address for the Cruise light switch request.

As far as PSI on SST. I currently run 27psi across on my Ralliart SST.
How do I find the right one?

WTF??? That can't be good? Forget the SST, isn't that even too much for the engine itself? Without forged internals I mean???
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2010 | 06:17 AM
  #4  
Golden's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
No 27 isn't too much for the engine. I wouldn't go past say 29 if you want to be safe. 27 is a good number to shoot for.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2010 | 06:26 AM
  #5  
Golden's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Cruise Address is 238045C5
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2010 | 06:37 AM
  #6  
germanracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Originally Posted by Golden
No 27 isn't too much for the engine. I wouldn't go past say 29 if you want to be safe. 27 is a good number to shoot for.
Even for the SST?!? According to my calculations that's 1.86 bar? That's quite a lot... My guess was around 22 psi / 1.5bar for the SST?

Thanks a lot for the help! You actually helped me in the past without knowing it... (the def website...)
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2010 | 09:34 AM
  #7  
migs647's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,043
Likes: 62
From: Portland
Originally Posted by germanracing
Even for the SST?!? According to my calculations that's 1.86 bar? That's quite a lot... My guess was around 22 psi / 1.5bar for the SST?

Thanks a lot for the help! You actually helped me in the past without knowing it... (the def website...)
I was running 27 for almost a year on stock internals. Not 1 issue.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2011 | 09:01 PM
  #8  
germanracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Germany
UPDATE:
Got it to work!!! Turns out there was a space where it shouldn't have been...
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2011 | 12:51 AM
  #9  
germanracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Originally Posted by migs647
I was running 27 for almost a year on stock internals. Not 1 issue.
Am I correct in thinking that would be about 185 in the Boost Target Engine Load tables?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2011 | 12:55 AM
  #10  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by germanracing
Am I correct in thinking that would be about 185 in the Boost Target Engine Load tables?
The BTEL table maxes at 159. You can set the Boost Control Load Offset to be a higher number.

Example. if your target load is 280 at 4000 rpm:

BTEL = 130

BCLO = 150

= 280
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2011 | 03:09 AM
  #11  
germanracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Originally Posted by razorlab
The BTEL table maxes at 159. You can set the Boost Control Load Offset to be a higher number.

Example. if your target load is 280 at 4000 rpm:

BTEL = 130

BCLO = 150

= 280
You mean 130 BTEL and 215 BCLO???

130 times 1.5 is 195!?!?

Either that or I don't understand it yet...

Anyway, thanks a lot, right now I'm learning many new things every day. That was an important one! Just found out that I must be boosting about 24psi, rather than the 22psi I thought I was... (bought the car tuned and used, don't have a boost-gauge)
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2011 | 05:47 PM
  #12  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by germanracing
You mean 130 BTEL and 215 BCLO???

130 times 1.5 is 195!?!?

Either that or I don't understand it yet...

Anyway, thanks a lot, right now I'm learning many new things every day. That was an important one! Just found out that I must be boosting about 24psi, rather than the 22psi I thought I was... (bought the car tuned and used, don't have a boost-gauge)
No.

BTEL + BCLO = Target Load
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2011 | 06:25 AM
  #13  
germanracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Question

Originally Posted by razorlab
No.

BTEL + BCLO = Target Load
awww, I get it, cheers!

So how do the wastegate tables figure into that?

For example, would it be:

110bclo+150btelx0.85wastegate=221 load ?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2011 | 08:58 AM
  #14  
Schneider's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Germany / Bavaria
Egal was du nimmst. Die Hälfte langt leicht.

110bclo+150btel=260

Load based boost control. Not boost based.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2011 | 09:06 AM
  #15  
fostytou's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,143
Likes: 7
From: Aurora, IL
Originally Posted by germanracing
awww, I get it, cheers!

So how do the wastegate tables figure into that?

For example, would it be:

110bclo+150btelx0.85wastegate=221 load ?
No, its a feedback system.

85% wgdc attains a certain pressure (which factors into load). The feedback loop looks at the attained load and says "is the car at/above/below my desired load (bclo+btel)?" It takes the answer and applies correction to the wgdc.

Please see the numerous tuning guides for this... there are quite a few in the CT9A section and I'm sure Merlin's guide has a decent section on it.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:09 AM.