Turbotrix X- 104whp over stock so far...
Evolved Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 1
From: USA
director7, if you click on the link on page 1, there's a number of different pics that show the dyno graphs and corresponding mods, then as you go up the page shows the additional mods. I will just tell you to save you the trouble. The mods are as follows: 2.5 in upper intercooler pipe, 2.5 in lower intercooler pipe, 3 in intake pipe and maf w/ cone filter, and 3 in turb back exhaust w/ mbc. That's it. Everything else is stock. NO TUNE!
AMS needs to get on that downpipe, look at the gains just from changing the damn thing. And AMS said that it wasn't restrictive at all! LIARS! lol just kidding. But seriously, TURBO TRIX, you guys f***ing rule. Front mount, according to AMS' results, should net a gain of about 10-15 hp by itself, add in tuning, and I think that we'll be in the neighborhood of 375-400whp on a dynojet/ 325-350 on a dyno dynamics or a mustang. BTW, keith what's with the dipping of power when the cat back was installed? At about 6000 rpms, it looks ike there might have been some knock, but seems to be gone with the downpipe added and cat removed. Is this correct, or was the dyno just losing the pickup signal during that run? Get this thing tuned, you guys are killing me with the suspense! Oh, and keith is this still with the ic pipe configuration from the pics that were shown initially, or is this with a new config? Thanks man.
You are really an AMS fan boy, I've been reading your post all across the board, AMS THIS AMS THAT.. beginning to annoy me..
, but at least you on topic..! 
I just wanted to vent off in public..
Request for the Turbo Trix guys ... if you are going to post uncorrected dyno charts, could you please also post the air temperature and humidity? (standard feature for DynoJet software) At least that way we can interpolate what the power gains are, taking temp and humidity into account.
l8r)
l8r)
Request for the Turbo Trix guys ... if you are going to post uncorrected dyno charts, could you please also post the air temperature and humidity? (standard feature for DynoJet software) At least that way we can interpolate what the power gains are, taking temp and humidity into account.
l8r)
l8r)
!!! I vote for corrected graphs.
Evolved Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 1
From: USA
I am not an AMS fanboy. I actually prefer turbo trix, but like 'em all. Your post was pointless, and the post from me that you quoted was directed at Turbo Trix, and had nothing to do with AMS, so your statement made less than no sense. And for the record, if you want to talk about annoying, your constant bashing of the X because you can't accept that it's the better car, THAT'S ANNOYING. Now back on topic, please.
Last edited by STi2EvoX; Feb 15, 2008 at 09:34 PM.
Jesus, who cares if the X is better than the IX, VIII, VII or whatever model. Its just a damn car! Ppl need to stop whining about this and just post about the topic being DISCUSSED NOT bickering back and forth
director7, if you click on the link on page 1, there's a number of different pics that show the dyno graphs and corresponding mods, then as you go up the page shows the additional mods. I will just tell you to save you the trouble. The mods are as follows: 2.5 in upper intercooler pipe, 2.5 in lower intercooler pipe, 3 in intake pipe and maf w/ cone filter, and 3 in turb back exhaust w/ mbc. That's it. Everything else is stock. NO TUNE!
I just checked the dyno runs in SAE instead of uncorrected. We picked up 107whp in uncorrected. I will have Jeff post the graph on Monday. Also, the car baselined 224.92whp and 223.92 whp. We were accused in another thread of starting with a really low baseline to get our "inflated" bolt on numbers. It is what it is guys. We baselined the car and documented our numbers for all our stages. 104whp gain in unccorected and 107whp gain in SAE.
Keith
Keith
Last edited by TurbotrixRacing; Feb 16, 2008 at 11:07 AM.