Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

New Deatsch Werks 800 cc injectors.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 12:11 PM
  #16  
HB Speed's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Tuning AWD's In socal !!


I have a Cobb intake so someof that may be different for others but it will get you close !
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 12:35 PM
  #17  
goofygrin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 4
From: Frisco, TX
5.904*7000/1200 = 34% IDC? That's hella low. or am I off in what you're showing us?
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 12:52 PM
  #18  
nala's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: OH
Any chance this can help with the "fuel dilution in oil problem"?
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 01:10 PM
  #19  
HB Speed's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Tuning AWD's In socal !!
Originally Posted by nala
Any chance this can help with the "fuel dilution in oil problem"?
That is from the overly rich factory tune
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 01:14 PM
  #20  
andrewzaragoza's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 2
From: DFW, TX
Originally Posted by goofygrin
5.904*7000/1200 = 34% IDC? That's hella low. or am I off in what you're showing us?
you are off. you are using the voltage which is wrong. should be the ipw at that rpm.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 01:14 PM
  #21  
nala's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: OH
Originally Posted by HB Speed
That is from the overly rich factory tune
I certainly hope that that proves to be the case. But based on the other long thread on the fuel dilution issue, it seems that the few people with custom tunes that have had their oil analyzed are reporting the same high levels of fuel dilution...

I'm looking for anything that can help!
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 01:53 PM
  #22  
goofygrin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 4
From: Frisco, TX
Originally Posted by andrewzaragoza
you are off. you are using the voltage which is wrong. should be the ipw at that rpm.
Right... the display he showed had V on the left and something in ms on the right. I figured it was ipw in ms... (figured wrong?)
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 03:08 PM
  #23  
awddyno's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Nice. They look so much like the Subaru injectors.
I hope someone post a decent injector latency values. Its kinda time consuming when you have to reflash each setting to find out which one works best.
I will have to give these a try.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 03:44 PM
  #24  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by awddyno
I hope someone post a decent injector latency values. Its kinda time consuming when you have to reflash each setting to find out which one works best.
Look at the post above by HB Speed, he posted the scaling & latency info.
Thanks HB Speed
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 07:14 PM
  #25  
dcasandman's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
I can not wait to get some of these and a turbo.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 09:18 PM
  #26  
awddyno's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
latency

Originally Posted by SiC
Look at the post above by HB Speed, he posted the scaling & latency info.
Thanks HB Speed
He also mentioned he had a different intake. It will depend on how the latency was done. If it was done before the intake install then that would work.
I haven't seen a MAF scaling on the released version of Ecuflash, so I'm pretty sure the scaling for the different intake pipe was done through the latency and injector scaling. If ecuflash was used.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 09:26 PM
  #27  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by awddyno
He also mentioned he had a different intake. It will depend on how the latency was done. If it was done before the intake install then that would work.
I haven't seen a MAF scaling on the released version of Ecuflash, so I'm pretty sure the scaling for the different intake pipe was done through the latency and injector scaling. If ecuflash was used.
I thought the Cobb intake doesn't change the MAF housing (just a cone filter) so MAF scaling shouldn't be needed. With the cone filter the AFR may be slightly leaner but most people adjust that thru the fuel maps and not with injector scaling. So even if he dialed these injectors in with the Cobb intake, there should be a minimal difference when using a stock intake.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 09:26 PM
  #28  
HB Speed's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Tuning AWD's In socal !!
Actually I loaded the stock maps with my scaling and injector latency and it was almost identical to my pre inj mapping all you should have to do is adjust fuel table to get wot right

Or a slight adjustment of latency or scalar if your intake is waaAy ofF

Originally Posted by awddyno
He also mentioned he had a different intake. It will depend on how the latency was done. If it was done before the intake install then that would work.
I haven't seen a MAF scaling on the released version of Ecuflash, so I'm pretty sure the scaling for the different intake pipe was done through the latency and injector scaling. If ecuflash was used.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 09:30 PM
  #29  
awddyno's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
I will try it when I get the injectors.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 11:10 PM
  #30  
Clipse3GT's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,185
Likes: 2
From: Cleveland, OH
Originally Posted by DeatschWerks
The latency and scaler that HB speed posted has worked well for several customers we supplied the data to.
I'm a bit confused on the DW 800cc scaler.

My math:

New Scale Value = [(New Injector Size * Original Scale Value) / Original Injector Size]

709.33=[(800cc(static) x 532) / 600cc(static)]

ECUFLASH rounds this up to 713.

Is this correct?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:32 PM.