Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

Intake manifolds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2011 | 01:21 PM
  #16  
chkmgnt59's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: DFW
and i think that's the biggest point, 20-30 hp difference. If its worth it, then go for it. But I really doubt that with all the fabbing and buying these TB, they'll be worth the money over the simple ported stock tb unless you need to squeeze out every last HP no matter the cost.
Reply
Old May 17, 2011 | 02:30 PM
  #17  
BRONCO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: europe
It's not just about HP but I want to help the motor breath by inhaling and exhaling freely. I want the car to make the power without struggling having restriction... a freeflowing high speed engine is what I desire. I just know the only thing I have not covered is the inlet manifold in my build so was wondering some others thoughts.

The thread is getting interesting and would like some more healthy discussion and advice on if you think it's worth it or not?

BRONCO.
Reply
Old May 17, 2011 | 08:29 PM
  #18  
hollywood_X's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Meridian, ID
Personally with what I have seen for stock frame turbo set ups you won't need any more than a P&P TB with a decent set of 2.5" - 2.75" piping (Like the Magnus setup) and a 3.5" - 4" intercooler. My Rev 3 mani helped out with throttle response due to the more even / better flow but over all the stock design is awesome. Now if I were running meth again the MAP Rev 2 or 3 intake would be a must for helping the even distribution.

Also I wouldn't bother with a big throttle body until you get to a 70+ lb/min turbo I just haven't seen where anyone has gained with them yet.
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 12:19 AM
  #19  
BRONCO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: europe
Originally Posted by hollywood_X
Personally with what I have seen for stock frame turbo set ups you won't need any more than a P&P TB with a decent set of 2.5" - 2.75" piping (Like the Magnus setup) and a 3.5" - 4" intercooler. My Rev 3 mani helped out with throttle response due to the more even / better flow but over all the stock design is awesome. Now if I were running meth again the MAP Rev 2 or 3 intake would be a must for helping the even distribution.

Also I wouldn't bother with a big throttle body until you get to a 70+ lb/min turbo I just haven't seen where anyone has gained with them yet.
Hi mate a 75lbs/min to 95lbs/min can be used on the build so pretty serious flow. Cheers.
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 10:10 AM
  #20  
3dman1's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: kennewick wa
Originally Posted by EvoX2NR
I would be interested to try this theory out. I have a 3" licp and no one has touched the fpred number my car produced on an actual dyno. I am in the process of getting back to a red and will give it a shot when I re-tune. I am sure your comment comes from a good place, but I typically have to see things on my own.
I made more power on a red and i was on a stock lower pipe and tb. All verified on English racing dyno. There is nothing to be had in a lower pipe. In fact i dont think there is any gains to be had in lower pipe ,02 housing, Tubular mani, most of these parts are way over rated and great power can be made on the stock parts.
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 11:26 AM
  #21  
chkmgnt59's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Originally Posted by 3dman1
I made more power on a red and i was on a stock lower pipe and tb. All verified on English racing dyno. There is nothing to be had in a lower pipe. In fact i dont think there is any gains to be had in lower pipe ,02 housing, Tubular mani, most of these parts are way over rated and great power can be made on the stock parts.
agree with some of this , but o2 housing was shown to give gains, and tubulars give big gains on a turbo red sized or greater, as many have shown.
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 12:05 PM
  #22  
3dman1's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: kennewick wa
The biggest gain i have seen was from the porting i did on my head intake and exhaust, Beyond that i dont think there is a lot to gain in a stock frame turbo.
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 12:11 PM
  #23  
WarmMilk's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 54
From: Federal Way, WA
Originally Posted by 3dman1
I made more power on a red and i was on a stock lower pipe and tb. All verified on English racing dyno. There is nothing to be had in a lower pipe. In fact i dont think there is any gains to be had in lower pipe ,02 housing, Tubular mani, most of these parts are way over rated and great power can be made on the stock parts.
can you post your dyno sheet here or make a new thread? I wanna see a Red on a 2.3 powerband...
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 12:28 PM
  #24  
3dman1's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: kennewick wa



I tried but cant post the graph from work. Its on the last page or so of my build thread on evo x forum. The spool wasnt great but that was because of surge. The thing wanted to spool like crazy and we were always detuning because it would surge. But whp and torque were very good and there was more left in it. when i finally got it on the dyno it was having leak down issues the overall power was down quite a bit from where it had once been. The motor is out and im going back to a 2.0 if that tells you anything about my situation.

Last edited by 3dman1; May 18, 2011 at 12:35 PM.
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 12:33 PM
  #25  
WarmMilk's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 54
From: Federal Way, WA
sweet thanks, that powerband looks like it'd be tons of fun at PGP
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 04:10 PM
  #26  
EvoX2NR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL
Originally Posted by 3dman1
I made more power on a red and i was on a stock lower pipe and tb. All verified on English racing dyno. There is nothing to be had in a lower pipe. In fact i dont think there is any gains to be had in lower pipe ,02 housing, Tubular mani, most of these parts are way over rated and great power can be made on the stock parts.
Actually, the 525 I made at AWD wasn't the number I spoke of... it was 550 after I put the ID2000's in up here in VA. Also, I did it on a 2.0L too
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 04:24 PM
  #27  
3dman1's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: kennewick wa
I would be curious to see the graph since im going back to a 2.0 from your graph at awd it looks like i will be loosing about 600 rpm spool. Im actually really interested in your 6262 build since i have a 3586 waiting to go on my car. Why are you going back to to the red?
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 05:32 PM
  #28  
WarmMilk's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 54
From: Federal Way, WA
Originally Posted by 3dman1

I tried but cant post the graph from work. Its on the last page or so of my build thread on evo x forum. The spool wasnt great but that was because of surge. The thing wanted to spool like crazy and we were always detuning because it would surge. But whp and torque were very good and there was more left in it. when i finally got it on the dyno it was having leak down issues the overall power was down quite a bit from where it had once been. The motor is out and im going back to a 2.0 if that tells you anything about my situation.
damn, that blows, I can't even imagine what it feels like for this to happen after sinking that much cash into an engine. I was really hoping the 2.3 worked out cause thats what I wanted a couple years down the road...

I just read the thread on the other forum, ERL said they're covering shipping back to them for inspection, are you still set on the 2.0 or is that up in the air depending on what ERL comes up with? also, is this gonna be a stock sleeve 2.0?
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 05:49 PM
  #29  
EvoX2NR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL
Originally Posted by 3dman1
I would be curious to see the graph since im going back to a 2.0 from your graph at awd it looks like i will be loosing about 600 rpm spool. Im actually really interested in your 6262 build since i have a 3586 waiting to go on my car. Why are you going back to to the red?
I will see if I can dig up the graph... though there will be a fresh one once I get the red back on.

The reason I am going back to the red is me not needing all the power of the 6262 and with the amount that I DD my (stuck in traffic a lot) the lag is not good either.
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 09:32 PM
  #30  
3dman1's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: kennewick wa
Originally Posted by warmmilk
damn, that blows, I can't even imagine what it feels like for this to happen after sinking that much cash into an engine. I was really hoping the 2.3 worked out cause thats what I wanted a couple years down the road...

I just read the thread on the other forum, ERL said they're covering shipping back to them for inspection, are you still set on the 2.0 or is that up in the air depending on what ERL comes up with? also, is this gonna be a stock sleeve 2.0?
Yes i am still set on a 2.0. Im sending the motor back to erl with no expectations i wanted to do buisness with english racing no matter the outcome of erls investigation. I am wanting to keep my build all in one house and english is fairly close to home and have proven to me they will bend over backwards to make a happy costomer. At this point im sure erl wants to point the finger at me and that may very well be deserved. When erl is done with the motor either they will fix it or i will fix it. I intend to send the pistons off for testing myself just so i know in my mind what went wrong here. One of our members here has a phd in metals and runs a lab in a nuclear metals testing facility and he has offered up his services to test the pistons and see if any thing can be determined one way or the other.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:07 AM.