Boost Gauge vs Cobb AP
Boost Gauge vs Cobb AP
So I just installed the AEM Tru-Boost gauge in my X. I plugged in my AP and went to the live monitor setting just to compare the results to the gauge. When the car is ideling, the Cobb reads -9 psi or so, while the gauge is reading -17 or so. Also, when I go full throttle, the Cobb always seems to read a little bit higher boost than the gauge. Which on is more accurate?
The way I ran the AEM is I T'ed off the line running from the manifold which then turns into a hardline and runs back to the firewall. Did I install it in a bad place? Thanks in advance.
The way I ran the AEM is I T'ed off the line running from the manifold which then turns into a hardline and runs back to the firewall. Did I install it in a bad place? Thanks in advance.
The AP reads directly from the ECU which gets it's data from the 3.3 bar MAP sensor mounted directly to the intake manifold, this is the boost number I trust. They are reading vacuum differently though (your gauge reads it in in/Hg) so that's a fine # to look at even though it really doesn't mean anything for you.
The AP reads directly from the ECU which gets it's data from the 3.3 bar MAP sensor mounted directly to the intake manifold, this is the boost number I trust. They are reading vacuum differently though (your gauge reads it in in/Hg) so that's a fine # to look at even though it really doesn't mean anything for you.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
evo10fanatic33
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
4
Dec 14, 2014 04:58 AM
evo10fanatic33
Cobb AccessPORT
1
Nov 19, 2014 10:06 AM
talek
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
3
Mar 16, 2011 07:16 PM




