Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

BeaterX gets an EF4, thanks MAP!

Old Feb 25, 2012 | 11:06 AM
  #46  
CurseDSM's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,588
Likes: 298
From: Pinckney, Michigan
Originally Posted by scheides
LOL who is calling this thing a pile? I haven't seen that anywhere? If it's like most other people complaining about this or that it's probably due to a sub-optimal setup...having all the little pieces to make the most out of a setup is what really makes it all work.
There is a few on this forum I have seen and on other local forums. Its a turd being its to"laggy" for there likeing so therefor its no good. I laugh being I'm sure you agree that its really not that bad.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 11:11 AM
  #47  
scheides's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Originally Posted by cursedsm
There is a few on this forum I have seen and on other local forums. Its a turd being its to"laggy" for there likeing so therefor its no good. I laugh being I'm sure you agree that its really not that bad.
Like I said above the transient response is awesome. It seems way more responsive than the FP Black I drove a while back, maybe murlo would have more input as he had one on his X.

I'm very happy with it.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 12:32 PM
  #48  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by scheides
Like I said above the transient response is awesome. It seems way more responsive than the FP Black I drove a while back, maybe murlo would have more input as he had one on his X.

I'm very happy with it.
Pretty tough for me to say honestly. My new setup is totally different and not fully dialed in. I did like my black a lot and so far I like this a lot.

I added a long runner manifold to this setup so that added some lag but I have a 2.2 now too. So who knows. I liked both so far.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 02:58 PM
  #49  
hotstix's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 368
Likes: 1
From: So. Cal
Is your block sleeved?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 03:08 PM
  #50  
CurseDSM's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,588
Likes: 298
From: Pinckney, Michigan
Originally Posted by scheides
Like I said above the transient response is awesome. It seems way more responsive than the FP Black I drove a while back, maybe murlo would have more input as he had one on his X.

I'm very happy with it.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 03:37 PM
  #51  
mayberry's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: Pine Bush, NY
Originally Posted by hotstix
Is your block sleeved?
I don't believe it is. It's a stg 1.5 motor which means the heavy duty internals minus the sleeves.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 04:18 PM
  #52  
scheides's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Originally Posted by hotstix
Is your block sleeved?
Originally Posted by mayberry
I don't believe it is. It's a stg 1.5 motor which means the heavy duty internals minus the sleeves.
That is correct. Stock block bored .020 over, standard JE pistons, MAP Ultimate Duty rods.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2012 | 11:49 AM
  #53  
MarineScout13's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Madison WI
I think people claim it being "laggy" because it's not like the stock. But then again these could very well be people that just started playing in the modded car scene. I know that I am in no way a guru and ask dumb questions, which I have done to Murlo numerous times. But these are also people that probably have never ridden in a big turbo over a stock frame. My HTA3586 is laggy and would never say anything stock frame is as bad.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2012 | 10:19 AM
  #54  
scheides's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Ya this is certainly not a stock turbo or ef2/green/BBX Lite, but it is amazingly drivable around town, in traffic, and cruising on the freeway. Pretty much any (realistic) speed in any gear you can stomp the gas and get going, drop a gear if you wanna really scoot, and since my motor is built I've even dropped two gears from time to time (5th to 3rd) so I can nail it at 6500 rpm or so and rev to 8500 for max smile factor
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2012 | 01:56 PM
  #55  
2003evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: FLO-RIDA
ef4 is a great turbo great for dd and power when needed on 93 u can make 400-440 on mustang dyno and on a dyno jet 500-525 safe without a aggressive tune and and on e85 or c16 600-650
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2012 | 07:00 PM
  #56  
scheides's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Originally Posted by 2003evo8
ef4 is a great turbo great for dd and power when needed on 93 u can make 400-440 on mustang dyno and on a dyno jet 500-525 safe without a aggressive tune and and on e85 or c16 600-650
Truf! Funny you should mention pump gas....

Decided to run a tank of pump gas through this thing. Same tune from shane when the car was on pump gas last year. Timing was just flat with the new turbo from like 5500+ so I added a little bit up there but nothing crazy. It runs good an no knock, just straight MBC, no WGDC at all it is zero'd out across the board. I'm sure it has a ton more in it with a few more psi up top but this is just my 'get me by on pump gas' tune-- nice and safe.



Tons-o-fun!
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2012 | 08:57 PM
  #57  
2003evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: FLO-RIDA
am i reading it right 169 whp with just 4 psi more on pump gas WOW!
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2012 | 06:59 AM
  #58  
scheides's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Originally Posted by 2003evo8
am i reading it right 169 whp with just 4 psi more on pump gas WOW!
NO you are not, that is the chart I posted before, initial results on e85.

470whp virtual dynojet on pump gas.
649whp virtual dynojet on e70.

Again, basically zero tuning yet, these are just initial numbers.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2012 | 03:17 PM
  #59  
2003evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: FLO-RIDA
Originally Posted by scheides
NO you are not, that is the chart I posted before, initial results on e85.

470whp virtual dynojet on pump gas.
649whp virtual dynojet on e70.

Again, basically zero tuning yet, these are just initial numbers.
i thought that was really high but thanks for clearing up
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kracka
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
622
May 28, 2020 07:06 AM
scheides
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review
4
Aug 23, 2010 08:59 AM
scheides
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review
68
Aug 14, 2010 04:49 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:19 PM.