Motor Trend STI 'First Test'
No, nothing about misfiring, this is the quote from MT:
"...our early-build GSR did suffer from one "handbuilt" niggle: an asthmatic engine that seemed to suffer respiratory attacks near redline, a symptom Mitsubishi says was most-likely an engine control gremlin that would be sorted by production. Under normal driving conditions, the four-banger, as well as all the mechanicals around it, performed flawlessly, but as the tach needle ticked 7000 rpm, the engine came down with a soft wheeze, a symptom that most likely cost the X a 10th or two at the track and dragstrip."
"...our early-build GSR did suffer from one "handbuilt" niggle: an asthmatic engine that seemed to suffer respiratory attacks near redline, a symptom Mitsubishi says was most-likely an engine control gremlin that would be sorted by production. Under normal driving conditions, the four-banger, as well as all the mechanicals around it, performed flawlessly, but as the tach needle ticked 7000 rpm, the engine came down with a soft wheeze, a symptom that most likely cost the X a 10th or two at the track and dragstrip."
Well, the fact that they even posted the results is kind of BS, of course then again it's mitsu's fault for not having a healthy version for them to test. Small ecu mapping problem probably, but it's a shame that it wasn't sorted out before it was given to motor trend. Getting a bad review right before launch because of something stupid is a costly mistake for Mitsu. However, all the other reviews of the car have been very good, so perhaps people will overlook this. Hate for the initial numbers to be posted and be on record when I don't think it accurately conveys the car's true performance.
sad how alot of people on this forum paper race 
They look pass the shortened overhangs, the lowered engine, readvised dccd, wider stance etc.. that the new sti has. Magazines also repeatedly stated that the car is more stable than their predecessors.
A faster and better car doesn't necessarily mean 0-60 -_- *if were talkin about tenths* if it was seconds that be a different story

They look pass the shortened overhangs, the lowered engine, readvised dccd, wider stance etc.. that the new sti has. Magazines also repeatedly stated that the car is more stable than their predecessors.
A faster and better car doesn't necessarily mean 0-60 -_- *if were talkin about tenths* if it was seconds that be a different story
Last edited by BlkFlat4; Dec 8, 2007 at 02:03 PM.
Ok let me ask you this question, if you had an 06 sti and you had an 08 do you think you would feel the difference between .3 tenths? Lets be honest Vin diesel
Thats right... but i bet you would feel the difference in all the other things that i listed before you can even begin to feel .3 tenths... unless you are --^ you kno who

Lets just agree that your definition of Faster is different then mine because i don't live my life "A Quarter mile at a time" lol and i don't think "Winning is Winning regardless of tenths or seconds"
You can mod a car to gain tenths or secs but you cannot mod a car to have shortend overhangs, changed dccd, wider stance, lowered engine mounting and etc... which would lead to a better performer if you added the same *Speed Mods to both cars* That is why i keep saying the 08 sti is better.
Oh and you haven't driven the thing and your coming to a conclusion that it is slower, which means you ARE paper racing.
Thats right... but i bet you would feel the difference in all the other things that i listed before you can even begin to feel .3 tenths... unless you are --^ you kno who

Lets just agree that your definition of Faster is different then mine because i don't live my life "A Quarter mile at a time" lol and i don't think "Winning is Winning regardless of tenths or seconds"
You can mod a car to gain tenths or secs but you cannot mod a car to have shortend overhangs, changed dccd, wider stance, lowered engine mounting and etc... which would lead to a better performer if you added the same *Speed Mods to both cars* That is why i keep saying the 08 sti is better.
Oh and you haven't driven the thing and your coming to a conclusion that it is slower, which means you ARE paper racing.
Last edited by BlkFlat4; Dec 8, 2007 at 06:13 PM.
Ok let me ask you this question, if you had an 06 sti and you had an 08 do you think you would feel the difference between .3 tenths? Lets be honest Vin diesel
Thats right... but i bet you would feel the difference in all the other things that i listed before you can even begin to feel .3 tenths... unless you are --^ you kno who

Lets just agree that your definition of Faster is different then mine because i don't live my life "A Quarter mile at a time" lol and i don't think "Winning is Winning regardless of tenths or seconds"
You can mod a car to gain tenths or secs but you cannot mod a car to have shortend overhangs, changed dccd, wider stance, lowered engine mounting and etc... which would lead to a better performer if you added the same *Speed Mods to both cars* That is why i keep saying the 08 sti is better.
Oh and you haven't driven the thing and your coming to a conclusion that it is slower, which means you ARE paper racing.
Thats right... but i bet you would feel the difference in all the other things that i listed before you can even begin to feel .3 tenths... unless you are --^ you kno who

Lets just agree that your definition of Faster is different then mine because i don't live my life "A Quarter mile at a time" lol and i don't think "Winning is Winning regardless of tenths or seconds"
You can mod a car to gain tenths or secs but you cannot mod a car to have shortend overhangs, changed dccd, wider stance, lowered engine mounting and etc... which would lead to a better performer if you added the same *Speed Mods to both cars* That is why i keep saying the 08 sti is better.
Oh and you haven't driven the thing and your coming to a conclusion that it is slower, which means you ARE paper racing.
1) The issue isn't what I would feel or not feel
2) The things you listed are irrelevant when it comes to discussing objective performance data provided by various sources
3) Character assassination and multiple references to F&F do not add significance to your irrelevant arguments
Here let me give you the definition of straw man so you can try to aviod doing it in the future:
Description of Straw Man
The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position. This sort of "reasoning" has the following pattern:
Person A has position X.
Person B presents position Y (which is a distorted version of X).
Person B attacks position Y.
Therefore X is false/incorrect/flawed.
This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because attacking a distorted version of a position simply does not constitute an attack on the position itself. One might as well expect an attack on a poor drawing of a person to hurt the person.
The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position. This sort of "reasoning" has the following pattern:
Person A has position X.
Person B presents position Y (which is a distorted version of X).
Person B attacks position Y.
Therefore X is false/incorrect/flawed.
This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because attacking a distorted version of a position simply does not constitute an attack on the position itself. One might as well expect an attack on a poor drawing of a person to hurt the person.
Now if we were discussing "which car is better?" or "which car has better handling feel?" your reasoning would be justified.
Now it's time for you to rant again and tell me not to reply to your post.
You've done it again. You've gone and proven your ignorance with another straw man argument.
1) The issue isn't what I would feel or not feel
2) The things you listed are irrelevant when it comes to discussing objective performance data provided by various sources
3) Character assassination and multiple references to F&F do not add significance to your irrelevant arguments
Here let me give you the definition of straw man so you can try to aviod doing it in the future:
The other poster and I hold the position that the new STI is slower than the old STI. We have several sources providing data which leads us to believe that. Thus, all of the improvements you brought up are irrelevant to discussing which car is faster.
Now if we were discussing "which car is better?" or "which car has better handling feel?" your reasoning would be justified.
Now it's time for you to rant again and tell me not to reply to your post.
1) The issue isn't what I would feel or not feel
2) The things you listed are irrelevant when it comes to discussing objective performance data provided by various sources
3) Character assassination and multiple references to F&F do not add significance to your irrelevant arguments
Here let me give you the definition of straw man so you can try to aviod doing it in the future:
The other poster and I hold the position that the new STI is slower than the old STI. We have several sources providing data which leads us to believe that. Thus, all of the improvements you brought up are irrelevant to discussing which car is faster.
Now if we were discussing "which car is better?" or "which car has better handling feel?" your reasoning would be justified.
Now it's time for you to rant again and tell me not to reply to your post.
lol, this is a forum buddy and i hope it isn't your life. Your point of view and oppinions are different than mines and it will remain that way so you can reply to everything i say because i don't care what you have to say or what meaning less data you post. I accepted that your view is different now just accept mine and get on with your life MR. Serious
Pull whatever you have out of your **** and lighten up
lol, this is a forum buddy and i hope it isn't your life. Your point of view and oppinions are different than mines and it will remain that way so you can reply to everything i say because i don't care what you have to say or what meaning less data you post. I accepted that your view is different now just accept mine and get on with your life MR. Serious 
lol, this is a forum buddy and i hope it isn't your life. Your point of view and oppinions are different than mines and it will remain that way so you can reply to everything i say because i don't care what you have to say or what meaning less data you post. I accepted that your view is different now just accept mine and get on with your life MR. Serious 


