EVO X vs STI - Tsukuba Lap Times
#19
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
I bought the Evo over STI for ease of modding, overall more precise steering and handling, the rawness factor, and the 4G63. When did I say I was basing my purchase on bench numbers? In fact, when did I say I was purchasing anything? Oh yeah, I didnt.
#21
This is just history repeating itself...not an excuse to **** on the X
EVO / STI
2006 1:05:07 / 1:04:72
2005 1:04.88 / 1:04:17
2003 1:05:30 / 1:04:69
2001 1:05:17 / 1:06:56
1998 1:04:69 / 1:06:73
1996 1:07:00 / 1:05:92
1994 1:06:52 / 1:06:26
1992 1:10:90 / 1:07:99
EVO / STI
2006 1:05:07 / 1:04:72
2005 1:04.88 / 1:04:17
2003 1:05:30 / 1:04:69
2001 1:05:17 / 1:06:56
1998 1:04:69 / 1:06:73
1996 1:07:00 / 1:05:92
1994 1:06:52 / 1:06:26
1992 1:10:90 / 1:07:99
#26
lol...you dumbasses who are talking sht about how the Evo X got beat realize that every single Evo model since 2003 got beat by the STI on this track.
lol, douchebags
lol, douchebags
#27
Evolving Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sconsin
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, according to the ever illustrious Car Top Magazine... I'd also be willing to bet that every single one of those faster STI laps came from a special more expensive lower production car such as the Spec C, S201/202.203/204... The Evo has never had an issue lapping Tsukuba faster than any normal STI in just about every test that has been done there. This coming from a former and most likey future Subaru owner.
#29
Evolving Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: portage, MI / STL, MO
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
right, cause there are no mitsu fanbois...
as far as i have seen, the STi community respects the EVO alot more than the EVO respects the STi.
BTW i drive an EVO now, so this isnt' really biased.
Either way, i love the IX's but im not a fan of the X.
The new STi is growing on me.