New Edmunds.com Comparison Test
The straight line performance numbers on the MR will improve once the SST gets sorted out.
Interesting that the track times are improved with the "softer" MR vs. the GSR. That should only improve as the SST issues get worked out as well.
- Patrick
Interesting that the track times are improved with the "softer" MR vs. the GSR. That should only improve as the SST issues get worked out as well.
- Patrick
It's hardly slower. In fact, it's virtually the SAME as the IX. The IX is less than a second faster....hardly a butt whooping. It's close enough that if several runs were made, the IX would win, then the X would win one, and so on.
The IX has less than a 1% advantage!!! That's nothing!!! I think the IX fanboys just like to complain.....
The IX has less than a 1% advantage!!! That's nothing!!! I think the IX fanboys just like to complain.....
Evolved Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, California
It seems that the EVO X MR is still having some of the issues that plagued pre-production GSR models. I cannot wait to see how it performs fully healthy. Also did not one person notice their price estimate for the MR? They are saying less than a base STI, which should put it in at just under or right around $35,000
.
+1
It seems that the EVO X MR is still having some of the issues that plagued pre-production GSR models. I cannot wait to see how it performs fully healthy. Also did not one person notice their price estimate for the MR? They are saying less than a base STI, which should put it in at just under or right around $35,000 .
It seems that the EVO X MR is still having some of the issues that plagued pre-production GSR models. I cannot wait to see how it performs fully healthy. Also did not one person notice their price estimate for the MR? They are saying less than a base STI, which should put it in at just under or right around $35,000
.- Patrick
Also did not one person notice their price estimate for the MR? They are saying less than a base STI, which should put it in at just under or right around $35,000
You're looking at 38-39k MSRP for the MR. GSR's price went up a few thousand from the IX to the X. Why would the MR's price go down when it's getting all of the new technology?
Evolving Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: the bay, Cali
if i remember correctly, the price from gsr 9 to X went up about $490 ($32500 to $32990) not counting the RS trim (since there is no evo x RS)
It depends on which package we're getting as the MR. There's no MR in Japan besides the "GSR Performance Package". I'm assuming that the MR we get will be the "GSR Premium Package" which includes the performance package, the stylish package (color matched vents and chrome trim) and the leather package. The Premium Package runs about 4.2m Yen which is about $39k. If they bring it over as JUST the Performance Package and make the rest options they could probably come in at less than $35k and I think that would be a much better way to do it.
- Patrick
Newbie
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Perth, Australia
Even if it was cheaper than the IX MR, I wouldn't even consider getting an X MR.
Since the SST transmission is on a *replace only* policy, the risk is just too big, even if there aren't any mods on the car. How many threads on this board are there of people getting screwed out of warranty work?
Since the SST transmission is on a *replace only* policy, the risk is just too big, even if there aren't any mods on the car. How many threads on this board are there of people getting screwed out of warranty work?
