Hope this is not a repost. It is a very good test. And yes the X keeps looking better (although still not enough for me to consider replacing my VIII)...

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1.*

 

Not repost

 

Damn it looks like the GS-R is a better buy according to the video.

 

MR for me at my age i need all the creator comforts

Cheers
Michael

 

So it looks like the MR was faster around the track because of the bigger brakes AND more boost when the box is in super-sport mode...

 

I want a white GSR with some black sexy BBS wheels with 100lbs weight shaved and dropped and single catback exhaust and i am set

what is up with subaru they need to leave US for that ugly design they killed a nice car.

 

wow another good review for the evo noiceeeee

 

Lap Times @ Streets of Willow

#1: Evo IX MR — 1:31.89
#2: Evo X MR — 1:32.42
#3: Evo X GSR — 1:32.51
#4: WRX STI — 1:32.68

No typos there. I copied and pasted.

 

Checkout photo 27 of 28. Notice the caption: "Love Evos but the new one isn't fast enough? Buy a used Evo IX."

 

And yet, in many other threads I'll be labeled a "fanboy" for saying the X is a bit of a downgrade...*sigh* lol

 

yeah, its sad that the new evos couldn't perform better than its predecessors but
they mentioned that the Evo X MR they tested had some high rev problems with sst which will be fixed eventually. hopefully, when they test the fianl version of the EVO X MR, it wont be slow but be as QUICK as EVO IX MR. sigh....

 

NEWS FLASH. HOT OFF THE PRESS: THE FOLKS AT EDMUNDS ARE A BUNCH OF IX FANBOYS.

 

so why is the X slower in the twistys and the starights?
Devolution?

 

It's been eating too many burgers apparently.

 

I had no idea that the Inside Line Editor in Chief Scott Oldham once worked for SCC. I guess that explains why these like Evos and STIs so much!