Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Evo (CZ4A) versus STI (GR) mega merge thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2010 | 03:21 PM
  #211  
cookiedo!'s Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Houston,TX
FWIW, you can tune out engine problems, but you cant tune out transmission problems
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2010 | 03:22 PM
  #212  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,834
Likes: 283
From: US
i love the current gen sti.. just wish it came with the jdm 2.0
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2010 | 03:32 PM
  #213  
EEVOH's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 239
Likes: 2
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by atombomb33
I will say this. While the Evo X can gain more power with only a few bolt-ons, the STI still weighs ~180-200lbs less. So, the Evo X has to make more power just to play along.

^ This. Thats the main thing I notice with my evo. It "feels" bigger and heavier. I was hoping i wouldn't notice it, but its not really all that bad and its much better than the subie in terms of handling.. At least stock for stock.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2010 | 03:55 PM
  #214  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Who said I was conceding? Frankly I'm going to take the "opinions" of top level tuners like AMS, Buschur, Cobb, Cosworth, APS, etc. as well as the personal experiences of the dozens of Subaru owners I know over what some internet gurus say. This thread offers no benefit to me, I'm the sole Subaru owner in here and it was undeniably going to get ugly fast. There's zero point in trying to defend Subaru on a Mitsubishi site.
Hey, I'm glad you came back.
My main point in the light mod discussion was that the Subaru turbo is smaller and has less potential. Its not like you can't upgrade the turbo.

You make a good point with modding a WRX too. Its a whole lot less expensive, and you could get it far along for less overall investment.

If there was no Evo in the states, I would probably have an 08+ STI wagon. I just don't have the money to build one like I would like.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2010 | 05:28 PM
  #215  
Aznknight47's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
if you want good quality build cars, the 1st thing comes up in my mind is Toyota, then honda.

just look at the road 2day, cars thats from the 80's that are still driving are either toyota or honda.

not saying that Mits's or Sub's are not quality build, sometime is all depands on the owner.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2010 | 06:05 PM
  #216  
Cyni's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Amby, check out the post by Airboy on WSC concerning the Evo tuning he did for us this week... Its absolutely amazing the gains I made with just a $170 test pipe and NO OTHER MODS. I'm easily above what my VF52 swapped WRX made, already.

If you ever wanna take my MR for a spin just shoot me a PM and we'll go for a rip.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2010 | 06:40 PM
  #217  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
I may have to take you up on that offer Craig, looks like the gains are right on par with a stage 2 STI.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 05:19 AM
  #218  
KPerez's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by Noize

GET BACK IN YER CAGE, BOY!

I'll still take that bet in spite of the weight handicap. The power difference and shape of the curve will win out. We need some dragstrip comparison fun up in here.
Seth, "the bomb" has a point here. The STI and X went head to head with the Stig driving both on Top Gear's track and the STI was faster. Yes, they both were bone stock so a little off of topic/relevance. That said, the results were probably the result of the weight differential.

Later, Ken
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 06:19 AM
  #219  
MicMcKee's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: Outside Ellicott City, MD
Originally Posted by KPerez
Seth, "the bomb" has a point here. The STI and X went head to head with the Stig driving both on Top Gear's track and the STI was faster. Yes, they both were bone stock so a little off of topic/relevance. That said, the results were probably the result of the weight differential.

Later, Ken
But didn't they choose the X over the STI in just about every other aspect?
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 06:22 AM
  #220  
MicMcKee's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: Outside Ellicott City, MD
Originally Posted by Cyni
Amby, check out the post by Airboy on WSC concerning the Evo tuning he did for us this week... Its absolutely amazing the gains I made with just a $170 test pipe and NO OTHER MODS. I'm easily above what my VF52 swapped WRX made, already.

If you ever wanna take my MR for a spin just shoot me a PM and we'll go for a rip.
Yeah even just a retune on my X (just a stage 1 flash) got me past where my VF52 08 WRX was (and the VF52 was far from the only thing I did to that car)...

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...wrx-evo-x.html

I won't bore you with all the details but that's what I came from, and the only I really miss are folding seats haha...
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 06:42 AM
  #221  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by KPerez
Seth, "the bomb" has a point here. The STI and X went head to head with the Stig driving both on Top Gear's track and the STI was faster. Yes, they both were bone stock so a little off of topic/relevance. That said, the results were probably the result of the weight differential.

Later, Ken
Ken, we don't have the SST GSR in the states, but I would expect it to lose around a racetrack to the probably 250 pound lighter STI where both cars are launched at the start.

The point we were contesting is comparable upgradability costs for a 100whp gain.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 06:55 AM
  #222  
slim8605's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Joliet, IL
Originally Posted by KPerez
Seth, "the bomb" has a point here. The STI and X went head to head with the Stig driving both on Top Gear's track and the STI was faster. Yes, they both were bone stock so a little off of topic/relevance. That said, the results were probably the result of the weight differential.

Later, Ken
STI did a 128.2 and the EVO did a 128.22... with more weight.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 07:02 AM
  #223  
kamote24's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: CenCal
Originally Posted by slim8605
STI did a 128.2 and the EVO did a 128.22... with more weight.
Don't they used the FQ-300?
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 07:36 AM
  #224  
KPerez's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by kamote24
Don't they used the FQ-300?
No, the car driven by the Stig was bone stock while the X shown earlier was the FQ-300. Jeremy could not accept the results, LOL.

Later, Ken

Last edited by KPerez; Feb 26, 2010 at 07:58 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 07:38 AM
  #225  
slim8605's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Joliet, IL
Originally Posted by kamote24
Don't they used the FQ-300?
Yea it was.

Is there a difference between the FQ-300 and a U.S. GSR other than it being rated at 300hp?

Originally Posted by KPerez
No, the car driven by the Stig was bone stock while the X shown earlier was the FQ. Jeromy could not accept the results, LOL.

Later, Ken
Earlier they tested the FQ-360 but for the timed laps he said they used the 300hp version.

Last edited by slim8605; Feb 26, 2010 at 07:45 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:39 PM.