dxbevo9

iTrader: (6)

<--- impressed thus far with the evo X

nemosEVO

iTrader: (10)

Keep it up guys...

BOOSTEZ

iTrader: (1)

If the gearing slowed the car down at the end of the quarter, then it's plausible. An extra 200-300lbs shouldn't offset the power::weight THAT much though.

IMHO, it's just not an impressive track time for 442whp, but that's not AGPs fault.

Congrats AGP for the fastest quarter-mile time so far!!


-M

Redline-Z

iTrader: (1)

AGP makes some great stuff and they got impressive numbers out of the X with minimal bolt-ons.

The gearing is def playing a factor here as is the 300lbs difference. Right of the bat that 300lbs. is going to slow you down an estimated .30 seconds in the quarter. Anyone have a link to the gear ratios or can you post them up? It seems like it is making a huge difference in trap speeds.

Jonasan50

iTrader: (1)

You guys have the factory head bolts on for now with the higher boost??

UMSTuning

iTrader: (2)

Internals have not been touched. It hasn't even had an oil change yet.

BOOSTEZ

iTrader: (1)

Right.

No matter how you look at it though, the weight and gearing hinders the X in the quarter-mile. That was my point.

nemosEVO

iTrader: (10)

Keep it up tony... and a little off topic but im going to you for all future mods after i saw what you did to Patricks car... all respect to a great shop.
Cheers,
Nemo

scheides

iTrader: (10)

LOL! Awesome that this engine is proving to be a great platform!

Any chance you can post some pics of that 20G? The dyno graphs look pretty nice, dynopak tends to read a little high but the numbers are still damn impressive.

ddawg1130

iTrader: (1)

I love all the X hate.

Lets all take a breather. Now think for a second... Is the evo a drag car? no

Seriously, if your so worried about the quarter mile times for whatever horespower then go buy a different car. Yes awd launches are fun. But awd turns are more fun.

This car is a track car. More power is allways welcome. But stop whining and or making useless comments about how the X is slower then the 8/9. X has AYC, 8/9 don't. AYC wheighs a good amount but makes up for it easilly on the track. I'd rather have the faster track car then drag car and hence why I bought an X.

Good work AGP and don't listen to the useless jealous/hater posts.

Gexxer

iTrader: (1)

quick i'm lazy someone post the JUN X passing all the cars starting from the back of the pack GO! just kidding im ont THAT lazy


it's not in english, but who cares

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mdqd_I1TcOQ

si_to_evo

iTrader: (1)

^wow! You can hear that JUN X cutting the through the wind

UMSTuning

iTrader: (2)

The 20g looks like stock...it's in the stock housing.

As far as DynaPack reading high...it does... comared to MD and DD, but I match up within 1% with dynojet. I have proven it with my 670hp 8 back in the day, all the way down to 120hp hondas.

Gexxer

iTrader: (1)

weird i thought you guys were on a dynojet... I got my dynojet done last week fully stock and they read my car at 272/299 whp/tq. i'm getting the flash done on thursday and going back to them on fri to see what kind of a difference that makes. car had 2600 miles on it when i got it dyno'd.

i will post the comparison between preflash and flashed though on friday. I'm also talking about the tsb reflash

UMSTuning

iTrader: (2)

I'd say that's pretty good give or take...we had 262hp...281tq (roughly) with 40 or so miles on it. I think you have the highest stock numbers I have seen...what were the ambient conditions?