Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Evo X is an Engine of the Year Nominee!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 12:51 PM
  #16  
GEORGE_23's Avatar
Newbie
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: europe
g T R
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 02:04 PM
  #17  
Mean TT's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
I bet the GTR motor will win. While the LS9 is a beast, so were the Hemis of yesteryear. The motor of the year has to be technologically advanced and perform with the best of them. The fact that the 3.8l is underrated at 483 hp, and is in a car that reaches 60 mph in 3.3 seconds is simply astounding. That is Ferrari Enzo territory. The M3 has a beautiful motor and it sounds amazing, but it does lack in fuel economy and total output.

I think that with the upcomng emissions and fuel economy concerns, many future motors will use turbocharging as the means to meet the performace and economy goals of the public. In that scenario, the GTR motor is at the forefront of this type of technology, giving the driver decent fuel economy for a 4000+ pound car with AWD, nearly non existant turbo lag, and great HP and Torque characteristics.

The 4B11 is simply outclassed in this field.

I love the M3's motor, but if I had to have one, it would be the GTR motor all the way.

Last edited by Mean TT; Apr 18, 2008 at 02:06 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 05:37 PM
  #18  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 137
From: Franklin, TN
The BMW S65 should win this. The VR38DETT is second place IMO.

That Audi engine doesn't deserve to be on the list IMO.

The 4B11 is outclassed in this company, but would shine more brightly if the stock fueling was better.

Sophia's daddy wants an E90 M3.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 05:56 PM
  #19  
love9sick's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Mid-West IL
Nice to even make it in there.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 06:54 PM
  #20  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
i think the evo should win it. Why?
only 2liter 4 cylinder engine
and the next step bigger nominee is almost twice as much with 2 turbo and 6 cylinder ...
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 07:43 PM
  #21  
boozeup&riot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 1
From: you-taw
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
i think the evo should win it. Why?
only 2liter 4 cylinder engine
and the next step bigger nominee is almost twice as much with 2 turbo and 6 cylinder ...
Good points, but for a title like engine of the year, I'm not sure that price/displacement/cylinders should be the ultimate deciding factors. However, as far as power, and efficiency as well as what you've already stated its a strong case. I think its cool that its mentioned at all.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 09:42 PM
  #22  
Grant's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Originally Posted by Mortis
M3 without a doubt. That motor is just sick. Great power, TQ, powerband. V-8 with a 8300 redline. Crazy man, crazy.
Torque? That 4.0L V8 has less torque (and same hp) than the Porsche GT3's 3.6L Flat-6. I the think the GT3 has the best engine made today.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 12:43 AM
  #23  
Resist the syst's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
I have to go with the 4b11, I've never seen a car with such violent revs, esp a 2.0l turbo 4. The X is real close to all these cars if you look at price to performance ratios. The GTR just doesn't do it for me, it's nice FOR SURE though, I'm also not a fan of BMW nor do I have any emotional ties to the Vette. 4b11 would receive me vote.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 12:49 AM
  #24  
assembeldbygod's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: On earth.
im thinking the zr1 because of its potential and oem power from the factory
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 10:29 AM
  #25  
Shahul X's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
From: Rockville, Maryland
true, the 4B11 could be up there since its proving people wrong over and over again..... it had quite a task of replacing a legendary engine (not the the VR38 didnt either...) and has done so with great flying colors and with the constraint of staying a 2 liter
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:03 AM.