Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Undecided between E46 M3 and Evo X MR [merge]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 05:38 PM
  #46  
JWA's Avatar
JWA
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Both times that I bought Evo's (VIII and X) I could have bought a new M3, RS4, 911, etc. instead but went with the Evo because it has the best feedback and is more of a pure driver's car. I have owned numerous 911's, a Boxster, M Coupe, Elise, etc. and am quite happy with my Evo X. Also, I should probably note that I don't buy my cars to modify - I buy them to drive. "Class" doesn't enter into my car-buying equation though, so for those who it does the BMW name might help sway them.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 05:39 PM
  #47  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by Rguy
I had an E46 M3 before my EVO X.

Its a great car, no doubt. But everyone has one around me. The engine and exhaust note sounds like complete crap, the shifter is worse than rowing a boat, maintainence costs were very high and depreciation was staggering.

That's probably the best point I've read in either M3 vs. Evo thread currently in X General. Good post!
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 05:41 PM
  #48  
vial8or's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Pomona, CA
Originally Posted by Noize
It sounds like you care about drag racing. An E46 M3 is not going to shine in that.

On topic, I would not take an E46 M3 over my X, becasue my X is a new car, and an E46 M3 would be older, higher mileage, etc. I wouldn't ever consider an M3 with an SMG. I drove an E46 M3 when I was looking at 335Is, and I liked the E90 335i lots more.

To me, it would go like this: E90/E92 M3 >>>>>> E90/E92 335i > X > E46 M3.

Same year to same year, an M3 is just in a higher league. Sadly, you pay for that. A new M3 also costs nearly double what an Evo X does.

The newest Car & Driver just picked the E92 M3 over a Nissan GT-R and Porsche 911 turbo. That's pretty insane stuff.
Damn....I haven't seen this issue yet. They picked up the M3 over those two???
Don't agree with that, but that does say something
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 05:41 PM
  #49  
96Forged281SC's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
What does a MR have over a GSR that makes it $9k more?
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 05:46 PM
  #50  
Boostedg35's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: utah
Originally Posted by 96Forged281SC
What does a MR have over a GSR that makes it $9k more?
9k? your dealer sucks


1. Leather
2. auto 6 speed shifting faster then you would bust a nut in jessica alba
3. better ride
4. mr standard goodies


Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 06:00 PM
  #51  
scumrat's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
an m3 is 10x better looking.faster out of the box.wayyyy nicer interior.way better craftsmenship.Think about this if you think the x is fast with a stock turbo engine,imagine a car that is already faster then adding a turbo to that.It is very expensive to upgrade and maintain an m3,but they are sooo sick.Some one said they sound like ****...that is a lie with an exhaust they sound like a ****in supercar.Not to mention all the wayyyy better wheel coices you have for an m over the evo which everyone uses the same effin wheels, and like i said they look soooo much better the paint quality is way better and your gonna get better service from the dealer,they are already proven and the x is brand new and already a bunch of **** is going wrong,get the m3!!!!
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 06:00 PM
  #52  
Bighec's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Take a look around the forums, and you will see that it does not take much to make an EVO X run 12's. Look at extremeboost, bolts ons, and no tune, and he's running high 11's.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 06:04 PM
  #53  
96Forged281SC's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Bighec
Take a look around the forums, and you will see that it does not take much to make an EVO X run 12's. Look at extremeboost, bolts ons, and no tune, and he's running high 11's.
I seen someone on here did a baseline dyno with their evo x and only got 215whp. I thought these things put 291 at the fly. Shouldnt that be alil more than 215 at the wheels
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 06:08 PM
  #54  
evolution_X_GSR's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Get the X you'll love it and you won't have to do much to get down to low 12s with a few mods + tuning. If you search in this forum there are already X in the 11s. It's only a matter of time before someone gets their X pushing 500+hp.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 06:10 PM
  #55  
96Forged281SC's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Whats the deal with their clutches going out?
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 06:19 PM
  #56  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
the M3 is a very very good car, just like the X.
i would get a M3, if i need something for DD. But on track the X, i think is cheaper to maintain and race . So i do not prefer the M3 over the X.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 06:24 PM
  #57  
Rguy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
From: Arlington Va
Originally Posted by scumrat
an m3 is 10x better looking.faster out of the box.wayyyy nicer interior.way better craftsmenship.Think about this if you think the x is fast with a stock turbo engine,imagine a car that is already faster then adding a turbo to that.It is very expensive to upgrade and maintain an m3,but they are sooo sick.Some one said they sound like ****...that is a lie with an exhaust they sound like a ****in supercar.Not to mention all the wayyyy better wheel coices you have for an m over the evo which everyone uses the same effin wheels, and like i said they look soooo much better the paint quality is way better and your gonna get better service from the dealer,they are already proven and the x is brand new and already a bunch of **** is going wrong,get the m3!!!!

LOL!

Have you owned the car before? They sound like crap. To get them to sound good you need a 1k muffler and 300 rasp eliminator..and even with those they still dont sound good.


here is stock...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7AVFRw-gIk


And they are just as fast stock as the X is and they respond terribly to mods. You need a 15k turbo kit to go fast.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 06:26 PM
  #58  
Rguy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
From: Arlington Va
Originally Posted by 96Forged281SC
I seen someone on here did a baseline dyno with their evo x and only got 215whp. I thought these things put 291 at the fly. Shouldnt that be alil more than 215 at the wheels
This totally depends on the dyno you use. Ive seen 240-260hp stock on some dynos.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 09:02 PM
  #59  
Fishstix's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 3
From: quwew
M3 is class, comfort, and power. EVO X is pure fun.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 09:17 PM
  #60  
dcasandman's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
Originally Posted by Noize
It sounds like you care about drag racing. An E46 M3 is not going to shine in that.

On topic, I would not take an E46 M3 over my X, becasue my X is a new car, and an E46 M3 would be older, higher mileage, etc. I wouldn't ever consider an M3 with an SMG. I drove an E46 M3 when I was looking at 335Is, and I liked the E90 335i lots more.

To me, it would go like this: E90/E92 M3 >>>>>> E90/E92 335i > X > E46 M3.

Same year to same year, an M3 is just in a higher league. Sadly, you pay for that. A new M3 also costs nearly double what an Evo X does.

The newest Car & Driver just picked the E92 M3 over a Nissan GT-R and Porsche 911 turbo. That's pretty insane stuff.
Off Topic=Ive read that Car & Driver and I am usually a huge M3 fan (Ive driven the new M3), but it gets owned in every performance aspect. It doesnt win one performance number. My opinion dropped some of C&D after this one. U drive 3 hardcore sports car and pick the one that is most comfortable. The M3 gets beat in the quarter by almost a second (12.9 sec 1/4), and 3 secs around the track.
On Topic= New M3>EVO X>Previous M3. This would be my order of things its just an opinion though. My wife hates the EVO though and says Im to old for it. Im 31yrs. New M3 is in a whole different class of car and shouldnt really be compared to EVOs. Yes, U can make an EVO very fast, but no matter what you do to it, it will never be as classy as the BMW.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:07 PM.