Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

I Hate The 4 - 5 Gear Ratio Gap!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2014 | 09:38 AM
  #16  
TravisF's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Sounds like you bought the wrong car
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2014 | 09:48 AM
  #17  
Thomar's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
Originally Posted by TravisF
Sounds like you bought the wrong car
Serious?
What about the OP's comment regarding "I do not have a Mitsubishi EVO, and am currently driving a Porsche Cayman S." is so hard to understand?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2014 | 02:14 PM
  #18  
Treyzian's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 177
Likes: 1
From: California
The longer 5th gear was thrown in by Mitsu for the following reasons:

1) Official highway MPG, just so it doesn't suck that bad.

2) Highway cruising speed.

3) Doesn't affect performance that much. How often/how long are you in 5th during autox (the more popular autosport)

4) For those with the money to competitively drag race/track, you can change out the gear or final drive.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2014 | 10:01 PM
  #19  
Iowa999's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,961
Likes: 7
From: Iowa City
Originally Posted by Treyzian
The longer 5th gear was thrown in by Mitsu for the following reasons: [snip]
How do you know this?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2014 | 10:45 PM
  #20  
Treyzian's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 177
Likes: 1
From: California
There was a post a while ago linking to a Mitsu tech document (not sure if that's what it's called), with a section where they kind of explained the characteristics of the 5 speed trans, and part of that doc addressed the "high speed" cruising speed/rpm and better resultant MPG.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2014 | 05:57 AM
  #21  
Iowa999's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,961
Likes: 7
From: Iowa City
URL or it didn't happen. As of now, it sounds like BS to me. It would have been just as easy to say that they did it because they wanted 1 through 4 to be close for rallying on gravel and then threw in a high 5th for transit. But I'm not going to claim to know why Mitsu did it without being ready to back it up.

ps. it's called a "white paper"
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2014 | 11:34 AM
  #22  
TravisF's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Originally Posted by Thomar
Serious?
What about the OP's comment regarding "I do not have a Mitsubishi EVO, and am currently driving a Porsche Cayman S." is so hard to understand?
Guess I missed that part. It's good he test drove it and discovered it wouldn't work for his needs without regearing. No reason to complain about the gearing though, just move on and get something else.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jacks Transmissions
Jacks Transmissions
0
Jun 12, 2015 08:35 AM
discopotato03
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
6
Jan 10, 2011 12:52 PM
PSM3
Evo X General
53
Dec 22, 2010 06:12 PM
Angry Slipper
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
12
May 3, 2009 07:21 AM
Hiboost
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
7
Jul 29, 2008 01:32 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:30 AM.