Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

2014 GSR vs mR

Old Oct 14, 2014 | 08:50 PM
  #16  
LB_Reddy's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 2
From: SF
On track mr hands down.I dont mind owing a gsr.coming from mt..the mr pays off itself at the end.Both are potent when it comes to modding.Im lovin the mr.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2014 | 09:29 PM
  #17  
Evol_Evo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Ca
I have an mr and love it but the sst trans is more expensive to maintain and tends to fail more often than the Manuel gsr trans. No problems here yet but I have read some bad stories on the sst
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2014 | 11:58 PM
  #18  
05-EVO-GSR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
If you can afford it and find it, get the MR with the Premium, Touring, and Navigation Package. Nicest driving EVO made.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2014 | 04:53 AM
  #19  
DGS's Avatar
DGS
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: MidTN
Originally Posted by ATLBuckeye
... If I did not hear that the MR shifts "faster than a human", then there would be absolutely no question that I would go for the GSR. I have drove manuals for the last 10 years and love the control (autos tend to bore me). I'll also add, that I have no knee problems , and I have zero problem with a stick-shift in bumper-to-bumper traffic.

So, questions are..
1. Has anyone, who historically always drove a stick-shift, bought the MR and was satisfied?
...
I haven't owned an automatic since the Nixon administration ....
... and I still don't.

The twin-clutch in the X is a paddle operated manual, with an "automatic mode".
Gears 1,3, and 5 are on one clutch, and 2,4, and 6 on another, so when you shift, it's a matter of the computer releasing one clutch and engaging the other.
That was one of the first things I noticed on my MR: It accelerates faster than the lighter car, all due to time saved shifting.

I had an '03 EVO VIII before the X, and I have to agree with Clarkson's review of the hydraulic "damped" clutch on the manuals: "hopeless".
The clutch damper makes it virtually impossible to shift quickly in the manual.
(This was done to save the gearbox. People with STi's in '03 kept fragging the gearbox trying to side-step the clutch, not realizing that you've got four fat sticky tires gripping the ground. You don't smoke the tires, you smoke the drivetrain.)
(The 328 uses a cable operated clutch, and -- even with the external gated shifter -- it shifts faster than the EVO VIII.)

The MR's six speed is built by Getrag, who make a similar 7-speed twin clutch for the Ferrari 458 Italia.
(And the consensus is that it's a huge improvement over the Italian made "F1" paddle shifters Ferrari used earlier.)

Despite this being my first "two pedal" car since the early '70s, I love the paddle shifters.
(Other than one highway trip, I *never* use "automatic" mode.)

I was also hesitant to make the move to paddle shifters. But one thing that convinced me to try it is that you can override "automatic" mode with the paddles.
If you don't like where the computer put the revs, tug a paddle and it jumps into manual.
(Hold the paddle to restore automatic.)

You can also shift either with the paddles or by "push-pull" on the stick in the side notch.

(Besides: I still have the Italians for when I want to heel-toe. )

The only learning curve issue I had was that it down-shifts just as fast as it up-shifts.
I had to learn not to down-shift too early when approaching a stop sign or red light.

However, be warned: the EVO's twin clutch is limited on the amount of torque it'll carry.
It'll handle stock power without a problem.
But if you're going to add a lot of power to the engine with extensive mods, you should go with a gearbox that'll handle more torque.

But for a DD, the twin-clutch really is the best of both worlds.

I do think the modes are misnamed: Instead of "normal", "sport", and "super-sport", they should be called "wimpy", "normal", and "kick in the butt".

I use "sport" mode for most driving. "Super-sport" shifts abruptly enough to give a bit of a kick to the drivetrain, while "normal" has a perceptible lag in response.


I got my MR loaded. (Premium, Touring, and Nav packages.)
The 2014 Nav-Com gets live traffic from Nokia's "HERE" system, but I use it mostly as an MP3 music server, off the SD flash card.
But this is the first car where I haven't had to keep a map book under the seat.
And I can charge my phone off the USB port in the glove box while driving.

I did have one issue with the "Fast-Key" system. The dealer gave me two fobs, so I stuck one in my computer bag.
But I couldn't lock the car with the computer in the trunk -- until I took the battery out of the second fob, so the car wouldn't think I'd crawled into the trunk.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2014 | 07:02 AM
  #20  
Napalm_Enema's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 91
From: Houston
keep torque under 360 and you can have 400 hp on an MR no problem.

I never drive in anything but S-Sport manual unless I'm holding a drink or something. It's also advisable to drive in S-Sport manual to improve clutch life as Sport and Normal use the clutches much more to smooth out shifting between gears.

That being said, S-Sport is ultra smooth once the transmission is up to temperature.

Love the MR, it's a fantastic setup and is really not an automatic as stated

You can get leather in the GSR or MR.

When you do go for a test drive in either car -

- Let it warm up until you see at least 1 blue bar on the temp gauge. Be nice to the car!
- Put the car in S-Sport mode when test driving the MR. This means - Put it in sport then take finger off mode selection for a second, then push and hold it forward to get it to go into S-Sport for about 4-5 seconds. Then push the stick to the left to put it into manual mode. You can drive S-Sport in auto mode but it is incredibly aggressive and will shift around 7k which is very offputting unless you are intending it!

Enjoy the test drives, and be sure to take both on the highway at 65-70 and listen how loud both are. The GSR in 5th gear is much much louder.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2014 | 08:29 AM
  #21  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by LB_Reddy
On track mr hands down.I dont mind owing a gsr.coming from mt..the mr pays off itself at the end.Both are potent when it comes to modding.Im lovin the mr.
100% disagree

mr for a street gsr for racing.

As soon as you start doing close to moderate and higher level racing, the MR won't worth a price, either the sst transmission.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2014 | 08:26 PM
  #22  
LB_Reddy's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 2
From: SF
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
100% disagree

mr for a street gsr for racing.

As soon as you start doing close to moderate and higher level racing, the MR won't worth a price, either the sst transmission.
What?Gtr35 use the same tech as the Mr?2k hp in the gtr u can do that same thing on the mr.u still disagree?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2014 | 06:24 AM
  #23  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by LB_Reddy
What?Gtr35 use the same tech as the Mr?2k hp in the gtr u can do that same thing on the mr.u still disagree?
Yes.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2014 | 12:59 PM
  #24  
ToMinLA's Avatar
Newbie
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Marina Del Rey,Los Angeles
Mr

I drove a stick in all of my Porsche ' s for 32 yrs. When I drove the MR I got the WOW factor. Yes I. Was impressed. I love it. When I go to Malibu I get into sport mode.
Perfect for the canyons. It's all up to you. Good luck the EVO is a great car.
Have fun shopping.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2014 | 01:07 PM
  #25  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,834
Likes: 283
From: US
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
Yes.
agreed with Rob, MR is very very nice and the choice I would make, but not for racing.. the trans is a problem, though there are mods for it. For me, I just don't want to live with a 5spd anymore, feels to dated. I think I would have been really tempted by a X had it could with a good 6 speed manual trans
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2014 | 06:03 PM
  #26  
.M.'s Avatar
.M.
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 899
Likes: 40
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
100% disagree

mr for a street gsr for racing.

As soon as you start doing close to moderate and higher level racing, the MR won't worth a price, either the sst transmission.
Agree
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2014 | 08:56 PM
  #27  
sblvro's Avatar
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 6
From: chicago, michigan, arkansas
Originally Posted by kyoo
agreed with Rob, MR is very very nice and the choice I would make, but not for racing.. the trans is a problem, though there are mods for it. For me, I just don't want to live with a 5spd anymore, feels to dated. I think I would have been really tempted by a X had it could with a good 6 speed manual trans
Let me know when you plan to sell your CT9A
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2014 | 02:43 PM
  #28  
DGS's Avatar
DGS
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: MidTN
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
100% disagree

mr for a street gsr for racing.

As soon as you start doing close to moderate and higher level racing, the MR won't worth a price, either the sst transmission.
Which, of course, is why Formula 1, WRC, and many other race series switched to sequential transmissions years ago.


Ferrari 458 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The only transmission available on the 458 is a dual-clutch 7-speed GETRAG gearbox, in a different state of tune shared with the Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG.[4] There is no traditional manual option, making this the fourth road-car after the Enzo, Challenge Stradale and 430 Scuderia not to be offered with Ferrari's classic gated manual. It is the first mainstream model to not be offered with a manual transmission.
After all, nobody would put a Ferrari Enzo, Challenge Stradale, or 458 Italia on a racetrack.

Last edited by DGS; Oct 17, 2014 at 02:45 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2014 | 03:34 PM
  #29  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by DGS
Which, of course, is why Formula 1, WRC, and many other race series switched to sequential transmissions years ago.


Ferrari 458 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


After all, nobody would put a Ferrari Enzo, Challenge Stradale, or 458 Italia on a racetrack.

now you being like a Honda Civic guys. lol
Try to justify they car with the NSX...

PS: FYI Evo MR does NOT have a race sequential transmission. Not even close.

Last edited by Robevo RS; Oct 17, 2014 at 03:37 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2014 | 03:39 PM
  #30  
stiggysaurus's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: NJ
the SST shifts quickly but just isn't designed to hold much torque unlike the ferraris you mention. I bet the MR would be pretty beastly if you spend $4k rebuilding the transmission but otherwise the OP is talking about a stock to stock comparison. The stock GSR 5 spd can handle more power and torque reliably than the stock MR SST.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:08 AM.